From Hell To Veins

January 27, 2012

Big Pharma is a Major Player Behind ACTA. What is ACTA? Worse Than SOPA.

How do you like being ruled by an unelected body of decision makers who are accountable to NOBODY EXCEPT THE WORLDS ELITE LEADERS? Welcome to world government that puts YOUR BEST INTERESTS down the toilet.

Below is an article that breaks down ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement), the ‘globalist’ world wide version of SOPA that launched protest world wide. But first, I want to expose the fact that big Pharmaceutical is one of the driving lobbying force behind yet another ‘law’ being pushed down the throat of the public WITH NO PUBLIC INPUT WHAT-SO-EVER.
—————————————————————————-

From Merck:

“Merck supports increased enforcement of existing anti-counterfeiting laws and the adoption of new public policies to strengthen existing laws and enforcement programs, including increased criminal and civil penalties for counterfeiters.

Read Full Report:
We advocate for such change in a number of ways:
http://www.merckresponsibility.com/priorities-and-performance/access-to-health/manufacturing-and-supply/anti-counterfeiting/public-policy/home.html

GlaxoSmithKline’s Position (They’ll Cry You A River)
“Adequate and effective protection of IPRs are pivotal factors in encouraging pharmaceutical companies
to invest in research. Without IP laws, GSK would not be able to fund new R&D and to provide new
innovative products which save the lives and improve the lifestyle of countless people. Nor would we
be able to easily prevent third parties from counterfeiting GSK products.”

Read Full Report:
GSK’s Position on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)
http://www.gsk.com/policies/GSK-Public-Position-on-ACTA.pdf

Eli LiLLY & CO (Cry You A River Act II)
“Lilly recognizes the importance of international efforts that seek to improve and harmonize intellectual property protection throughout the world. We continue to support international trade agreements that facilitate the implementation of effective patent protection for pharmaceutical products in important markets that formerly provided inadequate protection. Lilly also recognizes the significant contributions that U.S. trade laws and the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules have made in the area of intellectual property protection. We support their continued use to encourage developing countries to provide effective patent protection for pharmaceutical products. Adherence to WTO standards of intellectual property protection stimulates economic growth (through increased investment and retention of local talent) and ensures the availability of innovative medicines.”

Read More:
Positions on Key Issues
http://www.lilly.com/about/public_affairs/Pages/positions.aspx

Bayer AG Pharmaceutical

Phillip Barengolts Who has represented Bayre AG Co-Authored ACTA
http://www.martindale.com/Phillip-Barengolts/2407122-lawyer.htm

From my research Bayer AG has been actively engaging in ACTA (In Reverse / Stealing Trademarks) before it was ever signed.
Bayer Asked to Disclose R&D Cost Data for Anticancer Drug
http://infojustice.org/archives/7467

FULL ACTA LIST OF CORPORATE CONTRIBUTORS.
Funny that a warning pops up on my browser when clicking this link. DO NOT BE DECEIVED!! The website will NOT hurt or infect your computer. If this happen to you just continue on.
https://applications.inta.org/apps/auth/member_companies/
———————————————————————————-
Obama Signs Global Internet Treaty Worse Than SOPA

White House bypasses Senate to ink agreement that could allow Chinese companies to demand ISPs remove web content in US with no legal oversight
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com (FOR ALL LINKS and, there are many)
Thursday, January 26, 2012

Months before the debate about Internet censorship raged as SOPA and PIPA dominated the concerns of web users, President Obama signed an international treaty that would allow companies in China or any other country in the world to demand ISPs remove web content in the US with no legal oversight whatsoever.

The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement was signed by Obama on October 1 2011, yet is currently the subject of a White House petition demanding Senators be forced to ratify the treaty. The White House has circumvented the necessity to have the treaty confirmed by lawmakers by presenting it an as “executive agreement,” although legal scholars have highlighted the dubious nature of this characterization.

The hacktivist group Anonymous attacked and took offline the Federal Trade Commission’s website yesterday in protest against the treaty, which was also the subject of demonstrations across major cities in Poland, a country set to sign the agreement today.

Under the provisions of ACTA, copyright holders will be granted sweeping direct powers to demand ISPs remove material from the Internet on a whim. Whereas ISPs normally are only forced to remove content after a court order, all legal oversight will be abolished, a precedent that will apply globally, rendering the treaty worse in its potential scope for abuse than SOPA or PIPA.

A country known for its enforcement of harsh Internet censorship policies like China could demand under the treaty that an ISP in the United States remove content or terminate a website on its server altogether. As we have seen from the enforcement of similar copyright policies in the US, websites are sometimes targeted for no justifiable reason.

The groups pushing the treaty also want to empower copyright holders with the ability to demand that users who violate intellectual property rights (with no legal process) have their Internet connections terminated, a punishment that could only ever be properly enforced by the creation of an individual Internet ID card for every web user, a system that is already in the works.

“The same industry rightsholder groups that support the creation of ACTA have also called for mandatory network-level filtering by Internet Service Providers and for Internet Service Providers to terminate citizens’ Internet connection on repeat allegation of copyright infringement (the “Three Strikes” /Graduated Response) so there is reason to believe that ACTA will seek to increase intermediary liability and require these things of Internet Service Providers,” reports the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

The treaty will also mandate that ISPs disclose personal user information to the copyright holder, while providing authorities across the globe with broader powers to search laptops and Internet-capable devices at border checkpoints.

In presenting ACTA as an “international agreement” rather than a treaty, the Obama administration managed to circumvent the legislative process and avoid having to get Senate approval, a method questioned by Senator Wyden.

“That said, even if Obama has declared ACTA an executive agreement (while those in Europe insist that it’s a binding treaty), there is a very real Constitutional question here: can it actually be an executive agreement?” asks TechDirt. “The law is clear that the only things that can be covered by executive agreements are things that involve items that are solely under the President’s mandate. That is, you can’t sign an executive agreement that impacts the things Congress has control over. But here’s the thing: intellectual property, in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, is an issue given to Congress, not the President. Thus, there’s a pretty strong argument that the president legally cannot sign any intellectual property agreements as an executive agreement and, instead, must submit them to the Senate.”.

26 European Union member states along with the EU itself are set to sign the treaty at a ceremony today in Tokyo. Other countries wishing to sign the agreement have until May 2013 to do so.

Critics are urging those concerned about Obama’s decision to sign the document with no legislative oversight to demand the Senate be forced to ratify the treaty.

January 24, 2012

Big, Big Money Want’s “Vaccine Skepticism” Turned Into a thought crime!!

Editors Note:
I have NEVER asked readers to share any of my posts. This is the exception. PLEASE share this post with as many people you can!
—————————————-

I told you that the big money behind the vaccine industry CAN NOT CHALLENGE THE VACCINE SAFETY / ANTI VACCINE MOVEMENT WITH FACTS! We are kicking the vaccine industry’s hind end. SOPA, the bill to shut down websites like this one went down in flames (put on a shelf). So NOW, what do these slime devils in the vaccine industry want done with NO judge or jury to websites like this one and, their authors along with like minded doctors / science professionals, who are giving YOU the FACTS and, the REST OF THE STORY on vaccines? Since the vaccine cult / industry can not fight a FAIR fight, they are TRYING to take a page right out of ‘Fahrenheit 451’, ‘George Orwell’s 1984’, the old Soviet Union and Nazi Germany ALL ROLLED UP INTO ONE, by creating a BAZZAR LAW OUT OF THIN AIR to prosecute ANYONE who says ANYTHING negative about vaccines.

Like in the novel ‘Fahrenheit 451’ where books “not in lockstep with the state” were to be burned, these pro vaccines kooks want ALL vaccine websites and research BRUNED, DELETED from existence that do NOT give vaccines a glowing report. So much for REAL objective science OR, WHAT IS IT THEY ARE TRYING TO HIDE WHEN IT COMES TO VACCINES?

If deleting damning evidence against vaccines wasn’t crazy enough, these pro vaccine ‘crazies’ want people like me, doctors, scientists… ANYONE who exposes the chemicals, heavy metals, cancer viruses… that are in vaccines and, what they will do to a person once they get in the body, ARRESTED FOR THOUGHT CRIMES!! Anyone promoting trying to ‘burn’ or delete information and their authors arrested for ‘thought crimes’ needs to check themselves into a metal asylum.

For ANYONE who still believes that vaccines are for the ‘greater good’, LOOK WHAT KIND OF TYRANTS ARE BEHIND THE VACCINE INDUSTRY!. They can’t win an argument with facts so, they are desperate and, all of us who have exposed vaccines, HAVE ALSO EXPOSED THE NUT JOBS BEHIND THE VACCINES THEMSELVES.

To bad for them! The genie is already out of the vaccines vile and will NOT be put back in again.

Related:
Big Pharmaceutical Is Pushing National Socialists Agenda To Experiment Vaccines On Public By FORCE!

Also Related:
It’s Amazing how accurate I was back in 2009 when I wrote…
The Drug Story (A Parallel Universe To Climategate)

Speaking of vanishing from the internet…
Here is a link to ONE of the interviews with George Soros discussing his aiding and abetting the Nazis.
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=227192.0

This was bragged about by George Soros himself and this ‘bragging’ was posted all over the internet back in the late nineteen nineties. These self damning revelations have been removed and are very hard to come across today. HOWVER, not ALL records of this have been destroyed and it will resurface once again.
————————————————————————

Soros Mouthpiece Calls On Google To Police “Conspiracy Theories”
http://www.infowars.com/soros-mouthpiece-calls-on-google-to-police-conspiracy-theories/

Stanford scholar wants search engines to flag global warming, vaccine skepticism as thought crimes

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com For ALL sourced links
Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Former fellow of George Soros’ Open Society and current Stanford University scholar Evgeny Morozov has called on Google and other search engines to become thought crime enforcers, by providing warnings about websites that contain “conspiracy theories” such as the belief, held by a majority of Americans, that global warming is not primarily man-made.

Morozov, whose biography confirms him as a well-connected insider, decries in a Slate piece how the Internet is a useful tool for “People who deny global warming” as well as “the anti-vaccination movement,” calling on Google to provide a “socially responsible curated treatment” that would marginalize such beliefs by amending search results.

His solution is to, “Nudge search engines to take more responsibility for their index and exercise a heavier curatorial control in presenting search results for issues like “global warming” or “vaccination.” Google already has a list of search queries that send most traffic to sites that trade in pseudoscience and conspiracy theories; why not treat them differently than normal queries? Thus, whenever users are presented with search results that are likely to send them to sites run by pseudoscientists or conspiracy theorists, Google may simply display a huge red banner asking users to exercise caution and check a previously generated list of authoritative resources before making up their minds.”
Morozov describes the potential that such a move will be judged as Google “shilling for Big Pharma or for Al Gore” as “a risk worth taking”.

This represents a similar argument to Cass Sunstein’s “cognitive infiltration,” an effort by Obama’s information czar to slap government warnings on controversial websites (including those claiming that exposure to sunlight is healthy). In a widely derided white paper, Sunstein called for political blogs to be forced to include pop ups that show “a quick argument for a competing view”. He also demanded that taxes be levied on dissenting opinions and even suggested that outright bans on certain thoughts should be enforced.

Giving companies like Google, which has grown to virtually become the gatekeeper of the entire Internet itself and is already engaging in SOPA-like acts of censorship, the power to denote which political and scientific positions are acceptable and which are fringe “conspiracy theories” is an insult to free thinking and smacks of Chinese-style thought control.

Morozov’s argument is also completely undermined by the fact that the two so-called fringe “conspiracy theories” he forwards as being in need of Google’s thought crime control, skepticism about global warming and the dangers of vaccines, are views held by millions of Americans and are not “fringe” at all.
According to the most recent polls, less than half of Americans now believe that global warming is caused by human activity, a number that has been slipping for the past several years.

In addition, polls show that a quarter of Americans, some 75 million of them, believe that vaccines are unsafe and can cause autism. To characterize this as a minority conspiracy belief is like labeling Catholicism as a doctrine of a tiny fringe.

At best, views about global warming and the safety of vaccines can be described as being split, but to claim that skepticism over man-made climate change and the dangers of inoculations are “kooky” fringe conspiracy beliefs, as Morozov does in his article, is brazenly inaccurate and exposes the agenda-driven bias of his rhetoric.

This is further illustrated by the reader comments, which almost universally deride Morozov and attack his argument as being a thinly veiled demand for Internet censorship.

“The day Google starts doing things like this is the day I find a new search engine,” writes one.
“So, you are a supporter of internet censorship? Only of information that you disagree with, of course. So I assume Slate and NAF did not support the recent action regarding SOPA?” adds another.
Morozov’s rhetoric is merely one aspect of the wider move to turn the Internet into an echo chamber of establishment propaganda, drowning out alternative voices to the benefit of large pharmaceutical companies who make billions from selling risky vaccines and scientific bodies whose very survival depends upon the global warming myth being upheld.

It represents another effort to win an information war the establishment is currently losing, as Hillary Clinton herself admitted, by not just creating a new Orwellian Internet Ministry of Truth, as Bill Clinton demanded, but by ascribing this role to the very gatekeeper of the Internet itself – Google.

Blog at WordPress.com.