From Hell To Veins

November 8, 2011

2009 H1N1 flu pandemic ‘deaths’ of children were actually caused by MRSA

Editor’s Note:
You got to love this one. Not just for the fact that the mainstream media and their partner in crime ‘big government’ yelled “FIRE!!!!” in the theater over this totally debunked swine flu hoax to push dangerous untested flu shots onto the general public. That’s not even the best part in this latest 2009 swine flu hoax development.

The best part of this latest revelation is that, even after the medical industrial complex ADMITS the the so-called h1n1 deaths of these poor children were NOT EVEN FROM THE H1N1 VIRUS, they have NO interest what-so-ever investigating what is causing this rise in MRSA and ARE USING THIS LATEST FINDING TO PUSH VACCINES!!!!!

It doesn’t get anymore screwed up then that!!! Where are these so-called medical professionals ‘profession’ at anyway? The gutter?
———————————————————————

Truth comes out: 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic ‘deaths’ of children were actually caused by MRSA

Natural News (for all sourced links)

(NaturalNews) Remember two years ago when every news show featured hysterical reports about the so-called H1N1 pandemic and how the supposed killer flu was striking down healthy kids? True, many previously healthy children became critically ill, developing severe pneumonia and respiratory failure. And some tragically died after being diagnosed with H1N1. But was that really the accurate explanation of what caused their death?

According to the largest nationwide investigation to date of the flu in children who became critically ill, scientists from Children’s Hospital Boston have found another reason to explain the severity of the youngsters illness. It turns out that it most likely wasn’t H1N1 alone that caused healthy children to become so ill many died.

Instead, these kids were unknowingly infected with something else. That additional infection, the superbug known as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), spiked the risk for flu-related deaths 8-fold in children who were otherwise believed to be totally healthy before they became ill.

Almost all of these children who were found to be infected with the superbug were immediately treated with vancomycin, considered to be best treatment for MRSA. Yet they died despite being administered this powerful antibiotic and their deaths were blamed on the flu. But the new research suggests it was the MRSA that played a huge role in killing these children.

“There’s more risk for MRSA to become invasive in the presence of flu or other viruses,” study leader Adrienne Randolph, MD, MsC, of the Division of Critical Care Medicine at Children’s Hospital Boston. Said in a statement to the media. “These deaths in co-infected children are a warning sign.” He added this is especially alarming given the rising rates of MRSA infections being carried widely among children.

“It is not common in the U.S. to lose a previously healthy child to pneumonia,” Randolph said. “Unfortunately, these children had necrotizing pneumonia eating away at their tissue and killing off whole areas of the lung. They looked like immunocompromised patients in the way MRSA went through their body. It’s not that flu alone can’t kill – it can – but in most cases children with flu alone survived.”

MRSA risk continues to spread

Sixty percent of the youngsters investigated for the new study already had sometimes serious health problems before contracting the flu. But of the 251 children (30 percent) previously healthy children included in the research, the only risk factor that was identified which likely contributed to their increased risk of dying was a diagnosis of a MRSA infection in the lung. The researchers expressed surprise that the antibiotic used to treat the MRSA-infected children didn’t work and suggested the drug couldn’t penetrate the lungs or the disease moved too rapidly.

Recent studies have shown a worrisome rise in the number of youngsters who are carriers of MRSA. A 2010 study published in Pediatrics found that the number of children hospitalized for MRSA infections increased from 2 in 1,000 admissions in 1999 to 21 in 1,000 admissions by 2008. The cause appears to be the never-ending and growing use of antibiotics in people and animals. “The more antibiotics we take, the more we colonize ourselves with antibiotic-resistant organisms such as MRSA,” Randolph noted.

Curiously, the researchers are not emphasizing going after the cause and spread of MRSA infections as much as they are using their findings to push for flu shots. Their study, just published in the journal Pediatrics, promotes flu vaccination among all children aged 6 months and older.

Advertisements

December 28, 2010

UK Swine Flu Epidemic CAUSED BY FLU JAB? Money Out Of Thin Air?

A U.S. Army corpsman (medic) who was getting a hard time from the Army for exercising his RIGHT to ‘opt out’ of the 10’s of vaccines (mostly experimental) ‘issued’ yearly to soldiers, told me today, that he was ‘the guy’ that would dole out the vaccines. I asked him what he observed after giving out vaccines. He told me that when it came to the flu shot it was automatic that MANY of the people he shot up would get the flu. He also told me that while in Afghanistan he doled out the H1N1 combo seasonal flu vaccine. He said that after their immune system was weakened by the flu, many came down with swine flu and that quite a few soldiers had to be ‘evacuated’ out. Most likely to get on a respirator at a hospital somewhere. He had no idea how many may have died.

Most of us know flu shots cause flu but, that isn’t the whole story regarding these flu shots. Below, I posted Mike Adams’ great report on how flu shots and vitamin D3 deficiency help contribute to the swine flu outbreak in the UK. Like I said, it’s NOT the full story.

Here’s the dirty little secrete big pharma doesn’t want people getting wise to. Flu shots not only gets those who get the shot sick but, the people who get flu shots spread the viruses to those WHO NEVER EVEN GOT THE SHOT to begin with.

The medical literature clearly states that influenza viruses are “THE LEADING CANDIDATES FOR ALL ‘AIR-BORNE’ VIRUSES”. As Mike Adams points out (article posted below) that big pharma and, their big media whores, do NOT like to let the public know what the medic above knows. That is, most of the people who get flu shots get the flu. That’s not the only reason why they don’t want the public getting wise to what flu shots do to the human body. That’s because, if people are getting flu from the flu shot viruses then those ‘lab created’ viruses are ‘multiplying’ and attacking the host. If they are multiplying and attacking the host, they sure as hell are spreading into the unvaccinated HEALTHY population. It doesn’t stop there. If these lab viruses are multiplying in the hosts who get the flu causing vaccine, it’s a good bet that the viruses are ALSO MUTATING AS WELL, HOST TO HOST, SPREADING INTO THE POPULATION.

Now Factor In The H1N1 / H3N2 ‘lab’ viruses into This Equation, The Swine Flu Jab:
What the medic above told me about the troops getting the seasonal flu from the 2009 flu jab, was that after they got the flu, the h1n1 / h2n3 lab virus FROM THE VACCINE kicked in and the same troops got swine flu. The seasonal flu shot breaks down the immune system. This is the very reason why flu shots are KNOWN to be useless in the over thirty years worth of studies I HAVE POSTED ON THIS BLOG. Once a person’s immune system is broken down from the flu shot the ‘LIVE’ h1n1 / h3n2 lab viruses in the vaccine itself can then infect the body with the weakened immune system.

The British press have purposefully left out the FACT that the 200 so-called healthy people “fighting for their lives” immune system was weakened BEFORE they all came down with swine flu. Everyone in the health science community knows, that ON RECORD, swine flu ONLY effects those who have a weakened immune system.

What Mike Adams doesn’t tell you in his fine report is that those shot up with the 2009 swine flu vaccine had viral replication occur within their body and, most likely, viral ‘mutation’ ALSO occurred in their body. Those injected with the flu jab did NOT even have to become ill to spread the ‘air-borne’ viruses to people who didn’t even get the shot.

It once was highly debated and widely contested among our (American) ‘INDEPENDENT’ medical community (before the Rockefeller / big pharma takeover of all doctors /scientists / institutions) by some of the most famous doctors / scientists of the time, that vaccines were more responsible for spreading disease and death than nature herself. Of course BIG MONEY won that battle, and the data and arguments against vaccines are NEVER taught in the very big money medical institutions.

Last year the UK had one of the ‘best’ flu jab turnouts world wide. NOW, they are having a swine flu epidemic. Swine flu was virtually non existent. something we have not seen in a long time. Last year the same people pushing vaccines got caught red handed trying to pull off a swine flu fraud. Of course nobody got in trouble and the vaccine pushers made billions if not a trillion dollars.

Crime obviously pays and, if creating a pandemic to FORCE vaccinate populations are needed to make unlimited profit, who is going to stop them?

———————————————————————————————-

Swine flu pandemic outbreak sweeping through Britain even though 70 percent were vaccinated last year

(NaturalNews For All Links / Sources) A swine flu pandemic is sweeping through Britain despite the fact that 70 percent of Britain’s over-65 population was vaccinated against swine flu last year. This year, that number is nearly the same — 68.5% — but flu vaccine proponents insist that until everyone is vaccinated, the flu will continue to infect people.

What these vaccine advocates absolutely will not admit, however, is how many of those who are sick with the flu this year also got vaccinated last year. This little detail is left out of every mainstream media report on vaccines and the flu. They simply refuse to mention this all-important number, leaving readers to leap to the incorrect conclusion that only those who were not vaccinated get sick with the flu.

Most infected patients were previously vaccinated

That assumption is false. In fact, of the 450 critical care beds in England that are now occupied by flu patients, I have no doubt that most of those infected patients are people who received flu vaccines in the past.

Such statistics are never made available to the public or the press, of course. To release such statistics would expose the Great Lie of the vaccine industry: That flu vaccines simply don’t work on 99 percent of people!

In fact, the people who are most susceptible to catching the flu are precisely the very same people who get vaccinated. Why is that? Because vaccines weaken the immune system in the long run, leaving you more vulnerable to future infections. They deny your immune system the opportunity to practice its own adaptive response to invading microorganisms or viruses, thereby causing your immune system to atrophy in the same way that a wheelchair-bound person will experience leg muscle atrophy.

The immune system is a lot like a muscle: Use it or lose it!

But flu vaccines provide weakened viruses to the immune system (along with other preservative chemicals that can be extremely dangerous to neurological health). It’s sort of like working out your muscles at the gym but having your trainer do all the heavy lifting for you. Obviously you’re not going to have very strong muscles in the end because your body won’t need to invoke a very strong adaptive response.

The same is true with vaccines and the flu: If your body is exposed to weakened flu viruses year after year, it gets lazy and weak, and when it one day comes into contact with a full-strength virus circulating in the wild, it’s not in good enough shape to handle the challenge.

Vitamin D deficiency is widespread in Britain

At the same time this is going on, a person who is vitamin D deficient will also have an alarmingly weak immune system response because vitamin D activates the immune system to do its job. In people with extremely low vitamin D levels, even vaccines containing weakened viruses won’t solicit an antibody response. But instead of testing patients for vitamin D deficiency and prescribing that with the vaccine, conventional medical doctors and contagious disease authorities robotically urge everyone to just “get multiple vaccine shots” as if following one failed vaccine with yet another failed vaccine will somehow make them both work.

That’s idiotic, of course. And the other idiotic thing about all this is that if people had sufficient levels of vitamin D circulating in their blood, they wouldn’t need seasonal flu vaccines in the first place! That’s because a strong, healthy immune system with lots of circulating vitamin D is universally effective at halting ALL seasonal flu strains, with near 100% success in those with vitamin D levels between 50 – 70 (ng/dL).

The three main reasons behind Britain’s flu pandemic

So the real reason Britain is suffering a swine flu pandemic right now is actually three-fold:

#1) It’s winter in the Northern Hemisphere, and Britain is so far north (of the equator) that the people living there aren’t currently generating any vitamin D whatsoever. This makes virtually the entire British population ridiculously vitamin D deficient throughout the winter.

#2) The majority of the British population has been subjected to flu vaccines in previous years, weakening their immune systems and making them more vulnerable to this year’s flu strains.

#3) The flu strain itself is so successful in the wild precisely because so many Britons walk around in chronic states of immune suppression (from vitamin D deficiency, chronic stress, poor dietary habits and so on). This creates a “viral breeding ground” which encourages more rapid virus mutations that make vaccines obsolete anyway.

The question you are not allowed to ask vaccine quacks

The vaccine-pushing quack medical community believes that if they could magically convince 100 percent of the people to get vaccinated, they would have this problem licked. In their own minds, they have unscientifically convinced themselves that a vaccine equals automatic and full protection against a flu virus.

And yet even they won’t dare ask this simple question: Of all the people sick from the flu who are right now lying in Britain’s hospital beds, what percentage were vaccinated against the flu last year or this year?

The answer to that question will expose the outright fraud of the vaccine industry because the answer is a very large number. No one in the medical industry dares ask that question, of course, because they realize that delving into the actual re-infection rate of flu vaccine recipients would expose their quackery and fraud, causing yet more people to lose faith in vaccines which are, after all, sold based entirely on misplaced faith and clever propaganda.

The flu vaccine propaganda, of course, demands that people never be allowed to collide with the scientific facts about how many people who are vaccinated against the flu still catch the flu anyway. (The flu re-infection rate.) That’s why you will NEVER see an honest answer to this question released by hospitals, vaccine companies or vaccine-pushing doctors.

Keep taking your flu jabs, everybody. But don’t ask whether they actually work, because that question isn’t allowed to be asked in the cult of medicine that dominates the sick-care landscape around the world today.

We wouldn’t want actual science to interfere with a really profitable con job now, would we?

December 20, 2010

IT’S ALL THE INTERNET’S FAULT!!!! British Youth Don’t Trust Flu Vaccines.

Editors Note:

The Anglo establishment, like it’s American counter part, is furious that a much better ‘informed’ younger generation is refusing to by into the bull big pharma has sold their older generation counter parts on vaccines.

Below is the balling and whining by the establishment in the UK’s ‘Independent’ news rag that websites like this one and twitter are to blame for UK’s youth exercising their God given right to say NO to big pharma’s crap vaccines.

From the Independent…
“The virologist said people should listen to expert advice, rather than rumours from unqualified sources on the internet.”

The problem for this virologist is that WE as a people have been listening to them for far too long. The reason why far too long? The article along with it’s ‘expert’ goes on to discuss deaths, ‘PRESUMABLY’ caused by swine flu and influenza B, as a way to trigger fear into taking the swine flu vaccine. However when it comes to discussing the ‘contaminates’ in the vaccine, death, paralysis, miscarriages, cancer, genetically ‘altered’ lab viral mutations caused by the vaccine itself… those ‘realities’ are simply chalked up by this same virologist as “nonsense” or is NOT even discussed what-so-ever.

Another major problem for the pro-vaccine ‘spin doctors’ is that more and more people are ACTUALLY reading the vaccine inserts where it clear says the vaccine can cause Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), and miscarriages. Yet, as usual this ‘expert’ in no way mentions these FACTS. Only websites like this one gives the other side of the story. That’s why there is so much lobbying from dishonest people from every direction and organization to shut the FREE and ‘truly’ independent internet down.

It’s for these reasons why the public, by in large, no longer ‘blindly’ trust these so-called big pharma experts. The trust issue has very little to do with websites like this. If their vaccines WERE AS GOOD AS ADVERTISED by the people who push them, big pharma spokes people would have nothing to worry about from websites like this one.
———————————————————-

I’m not even going to copy ANY of this big pharma propaganda garbage, if you with to read it I will post the link below the headline.

Young not taking swine flu vaccine
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/young-not-taking-swine-flu-vaccine-2164554.html

October 22, 2010

New Flu Strains, Jeff Rense, Dr. Henry L. Niman And Big Pharma

This blog has posted the scientific data over and, over and, over and, over again that flu outbreaks run parallel to the number in the population that get injected with flu vaccines. For instance last year was the lowest turnout for ALL the flu shots, including the H1N1 vaccine. What happen in the same flu season was the LOWEST influenza outbreak year in many, many years if not THE lowest year. Also, over thirty years of research shows that the influenza vaccines simply don’t work.

This blog ALSO has been asking medical doctors who CLAIM they are getting the influenza / H1N1 vaccine themselves to explain what the viral and DNA /RNA mutations that WILL occur in the body be and, how can they guarantee the rest of us that those mutations won’t give rise to a much greater pandemic problem at some future time.

This blog sounded the alarm that we would most likely see new influenza strains pop up WHERE THE GENETICALLY ALTERED COMBINATION VACCINES WERE GIVEN, and sure enough, it happened JUST AS THIS BLOG SAID IT WOULD AND WARNED IT WOULD.

As it turns out, where the combo vaccines were first given in the southern hemisphere, where the first flu season occurs, we already see the H1N1 virus has already mutated.

Enter 1 Dr. Henry L. Niman
The very day the news of the H1N1 mutation hit the main stream media I wanted to see what ultra pharma insider and vaccine pusher Dr. Niman had to say about this. You see, Dr. Niman likes to call these viral mutations what only a super eugenist like Prince Phillip could love… “elegant evolution”.

I apologize for wasting the time of all the people who are already in the know about Dr. Niman but, since Jeff Rense refuses to give his audience ALL the details on Dr. Niman you can search the web to find links of his being an ‘insider’ for biotech stocks with connections to the vaccine manufactures. Yep, this guy is everything Jeff Rense is ‘supposed to’ be against, and it didn’t take Jeff Rense too long to have Dr. Niman on his show flapping his gums on the latest H1N1 mutation in the southern hemisphere where the new combo vaccines had been given to the population. No Jeff, I don’t respect your guest and I have every reason and right NOT TO.

Now, I suppose I need a disclaimer (or a where I stand) in regards to Jeff Rense’s radio program featuring Dr. Niman. Jeff Rense has a decent radio program and, I enjoy listening to about 90% to 95% of his guests. The other 10% fall into a category of…. 5% I have no interest in listening to but, even the 3% or so that I wouldn’t agree with, Dr. Niman falls into a category all unto itself.

Dr. Niman isn’t JUST ultra establishment, he is ultra Military / Pharmacological Medical Industrial Complex where Jeff Rense might just as well have on his program Dr. Offit and John P. Holdren pushing vaccines and ‘ecoscience’. Now, It’s Jeff Rense’s program and he can have on who wants but, I would strongly recommend that Jeff put on his program AS A REGULAR FEATURED GUEST (as Niman is) the other side of the coin to Dr. Niman’s “elegant evolution” viral mutation science. There are plenty of ‘credible’ guests Jeff Rense could have on to do this who have pointed out ‘EXACTLY’ what I’ve been pointing out on Dr.. Niman and much, much more.

To many, Dr. Niman is the name behind the word Recombinomics. What’s interesting here, is that the word ‘Recombinomics’ that Dr. Niman seemed to have coined, is derived from the word Recombinant. Now, what’s really interesting about his self ‘coined term’ is that Dr. Niman gets on the Jeff Rense program and, talks about the latest viral gene sequencing and makes it clear to all who will listen that these sequences are ALL occurring all the time ‘in nature’. He goes on to tell us the ONLY thing that can save us all is a Niman based vaccine that is way ahead of the gene sequence curve. Wait a minute! Isn’t that EXACTLY what big pharma is proposing with ‘their’ universal flu vaccine?

How does one figure to get a head of the gene sequencing curve? Well, if you ask Dr. Niman it’s vaccines manufactured using ‘Recombinomics’. Is this something new and different that ONLY Dr. Niman seems to have an understanding about? The answer in one word, HARDLY.

It’s very interesting to hear Dr. Niman go on and on about all these viral gene sequences ‘happening in nature’. When the very word ‘Recombinomics’ he coined is derived from a word THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GENE SEQUENCING IN NATURE.

Wikipedia defines the word Recombinant DNA (rDNA) which is core in ‘Recombinomics’…
Recombinant DNA (rDNA) is a form of artificial DNA that is created by combining two or more sequences that would not normally occur together through the process of gene splicing

So, it would appear that Dr. Niman’s so-called ‘Elegant Evolution’ is entirely man-made and, a term that would be more fitting had super trans-humanist / eugenics loving Bill Gates used it to describe his vaccine carrying mosquitoes.

Dr. Niman will have nothing to do with discussing emerging viruses from the very vaccines he supports and pushes, even though his entire self-coined science comes from the depths of bio-warfare labs.

I just want to conclude that, even though Jeff Rense gives Dr. Niman a platform to broadcast his pro vaccine / big pharma agenda where gene sequences can only happen in nature, (as he claims how the H1N1 virus occurred to begin with. See A.) and where bio weapons labs / releases can only happen in science fiction novels, someone has to say something about this guy and his message.

Quite frankly I get a little sick to my stomach when I have to hear Dr. Niman say WITH A GIGGLE… “yeah, the vaccines are largely ineffective but take them anyway…” on the Jeff Rense program.

June 4, 2010

H1N1 Vaccine Conflicts Of Interest & Conspiracy At The Who

Click for Population Reduction Documentation.

My Commentary:
A beta test in making buck while ‘attempting’ to FORCE mass populations into taking a dangerous vaccine. All in the name of depopulating the planet. This ties into to the U.S.A.’s NEW health care system / LAW, because you can guarantee that citizens will be required by LAW to follow these criminal lettered agencies vaccine recommendations once the health care LAW is up and running full swing.

Conflicts of Interest
WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies”

Deborah Cohen, features editor, BMJ, Philip Carter, journalist, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, London

dcohen@bmj.com

Key scientists advising the World Health Organization on planning for an influenza pandemic had done paid work for pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were preparing. These conflicts of interest have never been publicly disclosed by WHO, and WHO has dismissed inquiries into its handling of the A/H1N1 pandemic as “conspiracy theories.” Deborah Cohen and Philip Carter investigate

Next week marks the first anniversary of the official declaration of the influenza A/H1N1 pandemic. On 11 June 2009 Dr Margaret Chan, the director general of the World Health Organization, announced to the world’s media: “I have conferred with leading influenza experts, virologists, and public health officials. In line with procedures set out in the International Health Regulations, I have sought guidance and advice from an Emergency Committee established for this purpose. On the basis of available evidence, and these expert assessments of the evidence, the scientific criteria for an influenza pandemic have been met…The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.”

It was the culmination of 10 years of pandemic preparedness planning for WHO—years of committee meetings with experts flown in from around the world and reams of draft documents offering guidance to governments. But one year on, governments that took advice from WHO are unwinding their vaccine contracts, and billions of dollars’ worth of stockpiled oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza)—bought from health budgets already under tight constraints—lie unused in warehouses around the world.

A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered evidence that raises troubling questions about how WHO managed conflicts of interest among the scientists who advised its pandemic planning, and about the transparency of the science underlying its advice to governments. Was it appropriate for WHO to take advice from experts who had declarable financial and research ties with pharmaceutical companies producing antivirals and influenza vaccines? Why was key WHO guidance authored by an influenza expert who had received payment for other work from Roche, manufacturers of oseltamivir, and GlaxoSmithKline, manufacturers of zanamivir? And why does the composition of the emergency committee from which Chan sought guidance remain a secret known only to those within WHO? We are left wondering whether major public health organisations are able to effectively manage the conflicts of interest that are inherent in medical science.

… Article Continues HERE.

April 13, 2010

Rockefeller Founded W.H.O. Appoints H1N1 Cover-Up Committee

My Commentary:

It sure seems that corruption and vaccines go hand and hand. The new definition of ‘ACCOUNTABILITY’ is ‘LET THE CROOKS POLICE THEMSELVES’.

James Corbett
The Corbett Report
13 April, 2010

WHO Appoints H1N1 Cover-Up Committee

Reports that the WHO is appointing an ‘independent’ committee to investigate its own conduct in the H1N1 panic of 2009 has been tempered by the fact that one of the committee’s members, John Mackenzie, was in fact one of the advisors who urged the WHO to declare a pandemic in the first place. He also has ties to vaccine manufacturers, making him part of the very charge being investigated: that the WHO relied on advisors with a financial interest in declaring a pandemic regardless of the facts on the ground.

Evidence continues to mount that the WHO declared a pandemic for the relatively mild H1N1 outbreak last year in order to trigger billions of dollars of automatic vaccine contracts for the benefit of WHO advisors with connections to Big Pharma. In the face of growing opposition and a loss of credibility due to the conflicts of interests among key WHO advisors, WHO Director Margaret Chan called Monday for a “frank, critical, transparent, credible and independent review of our performance” before entering a closed-door meeting with the “independent experts.” No photographers were allowed inside and press was allowed only occasional access to the meeting.

Hopes for a genuinely independent investigation into the scandal were quickly dashed, however, when it was discovered that one of the group’s members, Professor John Mackenzie of Curtin University in Australia, was a member of the very panel that advised the WHO to declare the H1N1 pandemic. In fact, Mackenzie is already on record with his assessment of his own actions: “I think we did everything right,” he told Der Spiegel earlier this year.

Clues to the likely findings and recommendations of the group in Geneva can be derived from other comments Mackenzie made to the German paper: “The system of pandemic levels needs to be revised,” he was quoted as saying. “We need to fine-tune phase 6 so that the severity of the disease is also taken into account.” Analysts are expecting the review to find that the WHO was a victim of fog of war and loose definitions for a pandemic and that no individual will be held responsible for the billions of dollars that have been spent around the world on vaccines that governments are now giving away and may ultimately have to throw out.

Also at issue is why the WHO changed its definition of a pandemic virus just as it was considering whether the emerging swine flu may fit that critera. A definition available on the website before the panic specifically listed “enormous numbers of deaths and ilness” as a criterion for declaring a pandemic. By April, the definition had been changed to specifically allow for “mild” pandemics.

The cover-up committee is being formed ahead of the final report of the ongoing Council of Europe investigation into the scandal. Just last month, the Council released a draft report of its investigation into the affair, delivering a blistering critique of the WHO and its motives for declaring the H1N1 pandemic:
Some members of these advisory bodies evidently have professional links to certain pharmaceutical groups – notably through receiving extensive research grants from the big pharmaceutical groups – so that the neutrality of their advice could be contested. To date, WHO has failed to provide convincing evidence to counter these allegations and the organisation has not published the relevant declarations of interest taking such a reserved position, the Organisation has joined other bodies, such as the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), which likewise, have still not published such documents.
-“The handling of the H1N1 pandemic: more transparency needed”

The Council of Europe committee inquiry was spearheaded by Wolfgang Wodarg, the former chair of the Council’s health committee who made waves last year for saying that the WHO faked the pandemic to make money for vaccine manufacturers. The committee is expected to be quite critical of the WHO, leading many to speculate that the WHO-sanctioned group in Geneva is an attempt to get ahead of the damage and issue a limited hangout on the issue.

The independent group is expected to finish its meeting on Wednesday. No word yet if they will address the fact that flu vaccines actually increase the risk of contracting H1N1, or what the effect might be if a vaccine-pushing WHO ignores this information.

The H1N1 panic started last March, with the WHO estimating as many as two billion infections and millions of deaths. Newly released data shows that the 2009 flu season was actually much less deadly than the regular flu season.

RELATED:
The E.U.’s Investigation On The Who’s H1N1 Vaccine fraud.

April 9, 2010

Seasonal Flu Vaccine Linked to Increased H1N1 Risk. An Excersize In Damage Control.

My Commentary:
Big pharma’s OZ ‘pimp-daddy’ the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) HAD TO ADMIT not only the uselessness of the flu shot BUT THE RISKS AS WELL. However, true to corporate media form it did NOT come without a slew of damage control buzzwords and disinformation. It should be noted that total funding for ABC comes from their central government.

It’s not just the fact that over thirty years of SOUND research debunks big pharma’s cash cow, the flu shot but, one of the biggest REAL LIFE experiments happened this year confirming this very thirty years of research when the lowest turnout for the flu shot EVER was in lockstep with the mildest flu season. WELL DUH!
Please read ‘Lowest Flu Shot Turnout = Mildest Flu Season
Ill’ keep saying it AND showing the evidence that vaccines are a GREAT TOOL FOR SPREADING DISEASE! Among many other nasty things.

…and on a personal note. I was just given notice that someone close to me who had bought into the H1N1 flu shot lie was hospitalized by that shot and almost died. Her Doctor told her… “If you had NOT taken the shot it (her illness) would have been worse.” Needless to say she has sent that doctor to the pasture, so to speak. With doctors like that who needs snake oil salesmen?

With special thanks to Labvirus.com
Flu jab link to increased H1N1 risk: study
Updated Wed Apr 7, 2010 4:50pm AEST
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/07/2866522.htm

People vaccinated against seasonal flu appear to have been at increased risk of the H1N1 pandemic flu that killed thousands worldwide in 2009, Canadian researchers report.

But some researchers say the study contradicts other findings and suggest the link would be difficult to prove.

The findings appear in the journal PLoS Medicine.

Four studies led by Dr Danuta Skowronski of the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control in Vancouver, compared the vaccination history of people with H1N1 influenza to people without evidence of infection.

The studies included approximately 2,700 people with and without H1N1.

The first study “confirmed that the seasonal vaccine provided protection against seasonal influenza, but found it to be associated with an increased risk of approximately 68 per cent for H1N1 disease.”

A further three studies also found an “increased likelihood of H1N1 illness in people who had received the seasonal vaccine compared to those who had not”.

The researchers say these do not reveal a “true cause-and-effect relationship” between seasonal flu vaccination and subsequent H1N1 illness.

The observed association may also be “due to differences in some unidentified factors among the groups being studied,” they said.

Read rest of article linked at the top.

April 7, 2010

Mass H1N1 Immunization ‘Inappropriate’

My commentary:
This truly is a ‘Johnny-Come-Lately’ news article. The CDC / WHO were all to familiar with what this expert has to say about the H1N1 vaccination program and shot YET, these evil SOB’s pushed it onto children and pregnant women! Wall Street media did all it could to shut down and tune out ALL of the ‘experts’ that were saying the same as this expert and turn on full blast all the BS pushing the safety of the vaccine. One should ask… “Why is there NEVER two sides of the story when the story relates to vaccines? I will explain.

I never expect ANYONE who has NOT heard the news that vaccinations ARE a POPULATION CONTROL TOOL by those running the planet into the ground, to simply believe that. But don’t sit there and call me names like a spoiled child UNTIL YOU HAVE RESEARCHED IT FOR YOURSELF!

Here is a start. Ecoscience IS AN OFFICIAL US POLICY HANDBOOK. It describes how vaccines are to be used as a population control tool AMONG OTHER TECHNIQUES!! Order it, read it. Yes! The program is hidden IN PLAIN SIGHT!

Mass H1N1 immunisation ‘inappropriate’
Special thanks to Labvirus.com

6 April 2010 | by Simone Roberts Print this article Comments Share this article

The mass vaccination program for swine flu has come under fire from an infectious disease expert who says the risk of serious side effects was greater than any potential benefit for half the Australian population.

Writing in the latest issue of Australian Prescriber, Professor Peter Collignon, director of the Infectious Diseases Unit and Microbiology Department at The Canberra Hospital, said the Government’s response to the virus was “inappropriate”, fuelled by fears about its spread that were out of proportion to the real threat posed by the disease.

“Overall, swine flu has been associated with fewer deaths than seasonal influenza and is of low virulence,” he wrote.

Professor Collignon said the risk of side effects from the vaccine was greater than any potential benefit for 50 per cent of the Australian population, who were likely already immune because of pre-existing immunity or recent infection.

“In any mass vaccination campaign, those who are already immune are unlikely to get additional benefits from the vaccine, but remain at risk of adverse effects,” he wrote.

“In young people without risk factors, the rates of death and complications last winter from swine flu were very low and are similar to the risk of serious vaccine-associated adverse effects such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and anaphylaxis.”

According to Prof Collignon, around 50 per cent of people who received the H1N1 vaccine in the Australian trial had mild to moderate systemic adverse effects and 1.7 per cent had adverse effects recorded as severe.

In children, 20 per cent had moderate to severe systemic adverse effects after receiving a single 15 microgram dose of vaccine.

“It is very important that we make sure we do more good than harm with any vaccine,” Prof Collignon said, calling for large, prospective long-term studies on the safety and efficacy of influenza vaccines before embarking on further mass immunisation programs.

Prof Collignon also criticised the use of multidose vials in the vaccination program, saying it put patients at “needless additional risk” of contracting infections such as Staphylococcus aureus, hepatitis B and HIV.

Article

March 30, 2010

The H1N1 Vaccine Insert THEY DIDN’T WANT TO SHOW YOU.

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm182404.pdf

UP DATE:
Since posting the above link, the FDA has REMOVED ANY and ALL h1n1 flu shot insert information from their website. WHY?

If you want to know HOW EASY it is for ONE person to make a difference let me tell you a ‘true’ story…

I was talking with a business partner of mine and I told her NOT to get the H1N1 vaccine until she had read the insert that came with the vaccine. This, during the fall flu season when government and media was yelling ‘fire in the theater’ from the rooftops that we all had to get the shot or else we could all parish. Well. February rolled around and I caught back up with her and she said to me… “You know I would have never even thought to have asked for the insert, I want to thank you!” I said to her… See how they have us trained? She continued… Her, clients ALL said to her… “You’re going to get the shot aren’t you?” I told ALL of my clients to do the same, see the insert first. She said… They found out what I found out, if you want to see the insert you WILL BE DENIED.

All those people who would have gotten the shot ‘wised up’ and found out the same people yelling ‘fire in the theater’ did want ANYONE to see what information was in the insert. Not that I would trust big pharma’s inserts to begin with.

I find 8.1 very interesting when it comes to pregnant women. The insert has quite a different take then what the main stream medical complex was selling on TV, radio and print.

The corporate media is NOT your friend.

World Health Organization’s Loss Of Public’s Trust An Exercise In Damage Control.

Corporate media in February 2010, tried one of the lamest attempts ever to prop up the Rockefeller created World Health Organization by publishing praises from the ‘Pharmacological Industrial Complex’s’ very own so-called ‘experts’ saying that the WHO’s raising the pandemic level to SIX was ‘needed’ for the greater good. Even though at the same time, ‘good guys’ in the EU were investigating the WHO for ‘fraudulently’ distorting facts in order to a.) insure MASSIVE vaccine sales to governments by the companies who’s very own ‘experts’ were praising the WHO in the February massive damage control campaign and b.) to use a level six pandemic to empower governments particularly in the U.S. and E.U. to have ‘authority’ to cease all kinds of control in the name of a ‘national emergency’.

In the latest attempt to exercise ‘damage control’, corporate media shifts gears and is doing an about-face-march by slapping the WHO on the wrist and crying that the WHO indeed made a mistake and now the public refuses to take big pharma’s contaminated vaccines. Of course, nowhere in the article does the world ‘criminality’ ONCE even appear.

WHO Accused Of Losing Public’s Confidence.

RELATED:
For those who have ANY DOUBTS about Rockefeller created World Health Organization’s ‘criminality’ in the swine flu hoax see…
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg WHO FAUD INVESTIGATION

… and

Swine 11! Government Sponsored Terrorism.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.