From Hell To Veins

October 22, 2010

New Flu Strains, Jeff Rense, Dr. Henry L. Niman And Big Pharma

This blog has posted the scientific data over and, over and, over and, over again that flu outbreaks run parallel to the number in the population that get injected with flu vaccines. For instance last year was the lowest turnout for ALL the flu shots, including the H1N1 vaccine. What happen in the same flu season was the LOWEST influenza outbreak year in many, many years if not THE lowest year. Also, over thirty years of research shows that the influenza vaccines simply don’t work.

This blog ALSO has been asking medical doctors who CLAIM they are getting the influenza / H1N1 vaccine themselves to explain what the viral and DNA /RNA mutations that WILL occur in the body be and, how can they guarantee the rest of us that those mutations won’t give rise to a much greater pandemic problem at some future time.

This blog sounded the alarm that we would most likely see new influenza strains pop up WHERE THE GENETICALLY ALTERED COMBINATION VACCINES WERE GIVEN, and sure enough, it happened JUST AS THIS BLOG SAID IT WOULD AND WARNED IT WOULD.

As it turns out, where the combo vaccines were first given in the southern hemisphere, where the first flu season occurs, we already see the H1N1 virus has already mutated.

Enter 1 Dr. Henry L. Niman
The very day the news of the H1N1 mutation hit the main stream media I wanted to see what ultra pharma insider and vaccine pusher Dr. Niman had to say about this. You see, Dr. Niman likes to call these viral mutations what only a super eugenist like Prince Phillip could love… “elegant evolution”.

I apologize for wasting the time of all the people who are already in the know about Dr. Niman but, since Jeff Rense refuses to give his audience ALL the details on Dr. Niman you can search the web to find links of his being an ‘insider’ for biotech stocks with connections to the vaccine manufactures. Yep, this guy is everything Jeff Rense is ‘supposed to’ be against, and it didn’t take Jeff Rense too long to have Dr. Niman on his show flapping his gums on the latest H1N1 mutation in the southern hemisphere where the new combo vaccines had been given to the population. No Jeff, I don’t respect your guest and I have every reason and right NOT TO.

Now, I suppose I need a disclaimer (or a where I stand) in regards to Jeff Rense’s radio program featuring Dr. Niman. Jeff Rense has a decent radio program and, I enjoy listening to about 90% to 95% of his guests. The other 10% fall into a category of…. 5% I have no interest in listening to but, even the 3% or so that I wouldn’t agree with, Dr. Niman falls into a category all unto itself.

Dr. Niman isn’t JUST ultra establishment, he is ultra Military / Pharmacological Medical Industrial Complex where Jeff Rense might just as well have on his program Dr. Offit and John P. Holdren pushing vaccines and ‘ecoscience’. Now, It’s Jeff Rense’s program and he can have on who wants but, I would strongly recommend that Jeff put on his program AS A REGULAR FEATURED GUEST (as Niman is) the other side of the coin to Dr. Niman’s “elegant evolution” viral mutation science. There are plenty of ‘credible’ guests Jeff Rense could have on to do this who have pointed out ‘EXACTLY’ what I’ve been pointing out on Dr.. Niman and much, much more.

To many, Dr. Niman is the name behind the word Recombinomics. What’s interesting here, is that the word ‘Recombinomics’ that Dr. Niman seemed to have coined, is derived from the word Recombinant. Now, what’s really interesting about his self ‘coined term’ is that Dr. Niman gets on the Jeff Rense program and, talks about the latest viral gene sequencing and makes it clear to all who will listen that these sequences are ALL occurring all the time ‘in nature’. He goes on to tell us the ONLY thing that can save us all is a Niman based vaccine that is way ahead of the gene sequence curve. Wait a minute! Isn’t that EXACTLY what big pharma is proposing with ‘their’ universal flu vaccine?

How does one figure to get a head of the gene sequencing curve? Well, if you ask Dr. Niman it’s vaccines manufactured using ‘Recombinomics’. Is this something new and different that ONLY Dr. Niman seems to have an understanding about? The answer in one word, HARDLY.

It’s very interesting to hear Dr. Niman go on and on about all these viral gene sequences ‘happening in nature’. When the very word ‘Recombinomics’ he coined is derived from a word THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GENE SEQUENCING IN NATURE.

Wikipedia defines the word Recombinant DNA (rDNA) which is core in ‘Recombinomics’…
Recombinant DNA (rDNA) is a form of artificial DNA that is created by combining two or more sequences that would not normally occur together through the process of gene splicing

So, it would appear that Dr. Niman’s so-called ‘Elegant Evolution’ is entirely man-made and, a term that would be more fitting had super trans-humanist / eugenics loving Bill Gates used it to describe his vaccine carrying mosquitoes.

Dr. Niman will have nothing to do with discussing emerging viruses from the very vaccines he supports and pushes, even though his entire self-coined science comes from the depths of bio-warfare labs.

I just want to conclude that, even though Jeff Rense gives Dr. Niman a platform to broadcast his pro vaccine / big pharma agenda where gene sequences can only happen in nature, (as he claims how the H1N1 virus occurred to begin with. See A.) and where bio weapons labs / releases can only happen in science fiction novels, someone has to say something about this guy and his message.

Quite frankly I get a little sick to my stomach when I have to hear Dr. Niman say WITH A GIGGLE… “yeah, the vaccines are largely ineffective but take them anyway…” on the Jeff Rense program.

Advertisements

June 4, 2010

H1N1 Vaccine Conflicts Of Interest & Conspiracy At The Who

Click for Population Reduction Documentation.

My Commentary:
A beta test in making buck while ‘attempting’ to FORCE mass populations into taking a dangerous vaccine. All in the name of depopulating the planet. This ties into to the U.S.A.’s NEW health care system / LAW, because you can guarantee that citizens will be required by LAW to follow these criminal lettered agencies vaccine recommendations once the health care LAW is up and running full swing.

Conflicts of Interest
WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies”

Deborah Cohen, features editor, BMJ, Philip Carter, journalist, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, London

dcohen@bmj.com

Key scientists advising the World Health Organization on planning for an influenza pandemic had done paid work for pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were preparing. These conflicts of interest have never been publicly disclosed by WHO, and WHO has dismissed inquiries into its handling of the A/H1N1 pandemic as “conspiracy theories.” Deborah Cohen and Philip Carter investigate

Next week marks the first anniversary of the official declaration of the influenza A/H1N1 pandemic. On 11 June 2009 Dr Margaret Chan, the director general of the World Health Organization, announced to the world’s media: “I have conferred with leading influenza experts, virologists, and public health officials. In line with procedures set out in the International Health Regulations, I have sought guidance and advice from an Emergency Committee established for this purpose. On the basis of available evidence, and these expert assessments of the evidence, the scientific criteria for an influenza pandemic have been met…The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.”

It was the culmination of 10 years of pandemic preparedness planning for WHO—years of committee meetings with experts flown in from around the world and reams of draft documents offering guidance to governments. But one year on, governments that took advice from WHO are unwinding their vaccine contracts, and billions of dollars’ worth of stockpiled oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza)—bought from health budgets already under tight constraints—lie unused in warehouses around the world.

A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered evidence that raises troubling questions about how WHO managed conflicts of interest among the scientists who advised its pandemic planning, and about the transparency of the science underlying its advice to governments. Was it appropriate for WHO to take advice from experts who had declarable financial and research ties with pharmaceutical companies producing antivirals and influenza vaccines? Why was key WHO guidance authored by an influenza expert who had received payment for other work from Roche, manufacturers of oseltamivir, and GlaxoSmithKline, manufacturers of zanamivir? And why does the composition of the emergency committee from which Chan sought guidance remain a secret known only to those within WHO? We are left wondering whether major public health organisations are able to effectively manage the conflicts of interest that are inherent in medical science.

… Article Continues HERE.

April 13, 2010

Rockefeller Founded W.H.O. Appoints H1N1 Cover-Up Committee

My Commentary:

It sure seems that corruption and vaccines go hand and hand. The new definition of ‘ACCOUNTABILITY’ is ‘LET THE CROOKS POLICE THEMSELVES’.

James Corbett
The Corbett Report
13 April, 2010

WHO Appoints H1N1 Cover-Up Committee

Reports that the WHO is appointing an ‘independent’ committee to investigate its own conduct in the H1N1 panic of 2009 has been tempered by the fact that one of the committee’s members, John Mackenzie, was in fact one of the advisors who urged the WHO to declare a pandemic in the first place. He also has ties to vaccine manufacturers, making him part of the very charge being investigated: that the WHO relied on advisors with a financial interest in declaring a pandemic regardless of the facts on the ground.

Evidence continues to mount that the WHO declared a pandemic for the relatively mild H1N1 outbreak last year in order to trigger billions of dollars of automatic vaccine contracts for the benefit of WHO advisors with connections to Big Pharma. In the face of growing opposition and a loss of credibility due to the conflicts of interests among key WHO advisors, WHO Director Margaret Chan called Monday for a “frank, critical, transparent, credible and independent review of our performance” before entering a closed-door meeting with the “independent experts.” No photographers were allowed inside and press was allowed only occasional access to the meeting.

Hopes for a genuinely independent investigation into the scandal were quickly dashed, however, when it was discovered that one of the group’s members, Professor John Mackenzie of Curtin University in Australia, was a member of the very panel that advised the WHO to declare the H1N1 pandemic. In fact, Mackenzie is already on record with his assessment of his own actions: “I think we did everything right,” he told Der Spiegel earlier this year.

Clues to the likely findings and recommendations of the group in Geneva can be derived from other comments Mackenzie made to the German paper: “The system of pandemic levels needs to be revised,” he was quoted as saying. “We need to fine-tune phase 6 so that the severity of the disease is also taken into account.” Analysts are expecting the review to find that the WHO was a victim of fog of war and loose definitions for a pandemic and that no individual will be held responsible for the billions of dollars that have been spent around the world on vaccines that governments are now giving away and may ultimately have to throw out.

Also at issue is why the WHO changed its definition of a pandemic virus just as it was considering whether the emerging swine flu may fit that critera. A definition available on the website before the panic specifically listed “enormous numbers of deaths and ilness” as a criterion for declaring a pandemic. By April, the definition had been changed to specifically allow for “mild” pandemics.

The cover-up committee is being formed ahead of the final report of the ongoing Council of Europe investigation into the scandal. Just last month, the Council released a draft report of its investigation into the affair, delivering a blistering critique of the WHO and its motives for declaring the H1N1 pandemic:
Some members of these advisory bodies evidently have professional links to certain pharmaceutical groups – notably through receiving extensive research grants from the big pharmaceutical groups – so that the neutrality of their advice could be contested. To date, WHO has failed to provide convincing evidence to counter these allegations and the organisation has not published the relevant declarations of interest taking such a reserved position, the Organisation has joined other bodies, such as the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), which likewise, have still not published such documents.
-“The handling of the H1N1 pandemic: more transparency needed”

The Council of Europe committee inquiry was spearheaded by Wolfgang Wodarg, the former chair of the Council’s health committee who made waves last year for saying that the WHO faked the pandemic to make money for vaccine manufacturers. The committee is expected to be quite critical of the WHO, leading many to speculate that the WHO-sanctioned group in Geneva is an attempt to get ahead of the damage and issue a limited hangout on the issue.

The independent group is expected to finish its meeting on Wednesday. No word yet if they will address the fact that flu vaccines actually increase the risk of contracting H1N1, or what the effect might be if a vaccine-pushing WHO ignores this information.

The H1N1 panic started last March, with the WHO estimating as many as two billion infections and millions of deaths. Newly released data shows that the 2009 flu season was actually much less deadly than the regular flu season.

RELATED:
The E.U.’s Investigation On The Who’s H1N1 Vaccine fraud.

April 7, 2010

Mass H1N1 Immunization ‘Inappropriate’

My commentary:
This truly is a ‘Johnny-Come-Lately’ news article. The CDC / WHO were all to familiar with what this expert has to say about the H1N1 vaccination program and shot YET, these evil SOB’s pushed it onto children and pregnant women! Wall Street media did all it could to shut down and tune out ALL of the ‘experts’ that were saying the same as this expert and turn on full blast all the BS pushing the safety of the vaccine. One should ask… “Why is there NEVER two sides of the story when the story relates to vaccines? I will explain.

I never expect ANYONE who has NOT heard the news that vaccinations ARE a POPULATION CONTROL TOOL by those running the planet into the ground, to simply believe that. But don’t sit there and call me names like a spoiled child UNTIL YOU HAVE RESEARCHED IT FOR YOURSELF!

Here is a start. Ecoscience IS AN OFFICIAL US POLICY HANDBOOK. It describes how vaccines are to be used as a population control tool AMONG OTHER TECHNIQUES!! Order it, read it. Yes! The program is hidden IN PLAIN SIGHT!

Mass H1N1 immunisation ‘inappropriate’
Special thanks to Labvirus.com

6 April 2010 | by Simone Roberts Print this article Comments Share this article

The mass vaccination program for swine flu has come under fire from an infectious disease expert who says the risk of serious side effects was greater than any potential benefit for half the Australian population.

Writing in the latest issue of Australian Prescriber, Professor Peter Collignon, director of the Infectious Diseases Unit and Microbiology Department at The Canberra Hospital, said the Government’s response to the virus was “inappropriate”, fuelled by fears about its spread that were out of proportion to the real threat posed by the disease.

“Overall, swine flu has been associated with fewer deaths than seasonal influenza and is of low virulence,” he wrote.

Professor Collignon said the risk of side effects from the vaccine was greater than any potential benefit for 50 per cent of the Australian population, who were likely already immune because of pre-existing immunity or recent infection.

“In any mass vaccination campaign, those who are already immune are unlikely to get additional benefits from the vaccine, but remain at risk of adverse effects,” he wrote.

“In young people without risk factors, the rates of death and complications last winter from swine flu were very low and are similar to the risk of serious vaccine-associated adverse effects such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and anaphylaxis.”

According to Prof Collignon, around 50 per cent of people who received the H1N1 vaccine in the Australian trial had mild to moderate systemic adverse effects and 1.7 per cent had adverse effects recorded as severe.

In children, 20 per cent had moderate to severe systemic adverse effects after receiving a single 15 microgram dose of vaccine.

“It is very important that we make sure we do more good than harm with any vaccine,” Prof Collignon said, calling for large, prospective long-term studies on the safety and efficacy of influenza vaccines before embarking on further mass immunisation programs.

Prof Collignon also criticised the use of multidose vials in the vaccination program, saying it put patients at “needless additional risk” of contracting infections such as Staphylococcus aureus, hepatitis B and HIV.

Article

March 30, 2010

The H1N1 Vaccine Insert THEY DIDN’T WANT TO SHOW YOU.

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm182404.pdf

UP DATE:
Since posting the above link, the FDA has REMOVED ANY and ALL h1n1 flu shot insert information from their website. WHY?

If you want to know HOW EASY it is for ONE person to make a difference let me tell you a ‘true’ story…

I was talking with a business partner of mine and I told her NOT to get the H1N1 vaccine until she had read the insert that came with the vaccine. This, during the fall flu season when government and media was yelling ‘fire in the theater’ from the rooftops that we all had to get the shot or else we could all parish. Well. February rolled around and I caught back up with her and she said to me… “You know I would have never even thought to have asked for the insert, I want to thank you!” I said to her… See how they have us trained? She continued… Her, clients ALL said to her… “You’re going to get the shot aren’t you?” I told ALL of my clients to do the same, see the insert first. She said… They found out what I found out, if you want to see the insert you WILL BE DENIED.

All those people who would have gotten the shot ‘wised up’ and found out the same people yelling ‘fire in the theater’ did want ANYONE to see what information was in the insert. Not that I would trust big pharma’s inserts to begin with.

I find 8.1 very interesting when it comes to pregnant women. The insert has quite a different take then what the main stream medical complex was selling on TV, radio and print.

The corporate media is NOT your friend.

World Health Organization’s Loss Of Public’s Trust An Exercise In Damage Control.

Corporate media in February 2010, tried one of the lamest attempts ever to prop up the Rockefeller created World Health Organization by publishing praises from the ‘Pharmacological Industrial Complex’s’ very own so-called ‘experts’ saying that the WHO’s raising the pandemic level to SIX was ‘needed’ for the greater good. Even though at the same time, ‘good guys’ in the EU were investigating the WHO for ‘fraudulently’ distorting facts in order to a.) insure MASSIVE vaccine sales to governments by the companies who’s very own ‘experts’ were praising the WHO in the February massive damage control campaign and b.) to use a level six pandemic to empower governments particularly in the U.S. and E.U. to have ‘authority’ to cease all kinds of control in the name of a ‘national emergency’.

In the latest attempt to exercise ‘damage control’, corporate media shifts gears and is doing an about-face-march by slapping the WHO on the wrist and crying that the WHO indeed made a mistake and now the public refuses to take big pharma’s contaminated vaccines. Of course, nowhere in the article does the world ‘criminality’ ONCE even appear.

WHO Accused Of Losing Public’s Confidence.

RELATED:
For those who have ANY DOUBTS about Rockefeller created World Health Organization’s ‘criminality’ in the swine flu hoax see…
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg WHO FAUD INVESTIGATION

… and

Swine 11! Government Sponsored Terrorism.

February 20, 2010

“NO FLU VACCINE HAS EVER WORKED” Expert Explains the Flu Vaccine Deception

My Commentary:
It’s awfully hard for the PRO vaccive detractors to ignore this EXPERT, let alone say he can in no way know what he is talking about . His comments on flu vaccines begs the question. If the establishment is lying about the flu vaccines, and one has to be in ULTRA denial NOT to get that, we as a society have to ask… “Well, what else are they lying to us about when it comes to vaccines?”

THINK people!

Expert Explains the Flu Vaccine Deception and the Swine Flu Hoax
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
Dr. Shiv Chopra was a drug company insider, and also worked for what is now Health Canada — the Canadian equivalent of the FDA. He is uniquely qualified to explain why no flu vaccine has ever worked, and that swine flu and avian flu are nothing more than hoaxes.

Posted by: Dr. Mercola

February 18, 2010

WHO: Add swine flu to regular flu vaccine

My Commentary:
The same organization the Rockefeller family founded and is under investigation for bribery and FALSELY causing a global panic is ordering the H1N1 vaccine be added to seasonal flu vaccines. There are several problems with this from a scientific and SAFETY point of interest. Many virologist have long question the practice of combing viruses in ONE shot for many reasons. How these viruses will or NOT work together has never been studied for long term effects. An organization that would cause a world wide panic for profit must most certainly have the public’s best interest in mind. Yes it’s ALL for the greater good. GIVE ME A BREAK!!

(AP) – 7 hours ago
LONDON — The World Health Organization is recommending that swine flu be added to the regular flu vaccine next season.
WHO said in a statement Thursday that it held a meeting this week to decide which flu strains should be recommended to drug makers for their vaccines during the northern hemisphere’s next flu season, which begins in the fall.
Flu vaccines have three virus strains — which experts decide on after estimating which strains made the most people sick last season.
Last year, the swine flu pandemic virus, or H1N1, emerged too late to be added to the regular flu vaccine and a new vaccine was needed.

January 27, 2010

Drug firms ‘drove down’ swine flu pandemic warning to recoup £billions

Source:
Mail Online

I just want to add a quick comment. The Mail Online wrote a hit piece on Dr. Wakefiled. If Big Pharma has the pull to tell the WHO and CDC how high to jump at the snap of a finger do you really think Dr. Wakefield is getting a fair hearing?

Last updated at 7:49 AM on 27th January 2010

Drug companies manipulated the World Health Organisation into downgrading its definition of a pandemic so they could cash in on a swine flu outbreak, it is claimed.
An inquiry heard yesterday that the WHO allegedly softened its criteria for declaring a H1N1 flu pandemic last spring – just weeks before announcing there was a worldwide outbreak.
Critics said the decision was driven by pharmaceutical companies desperate to recoup the billions of pounds they had invested in researching and developing pandemic vaccines after the bird flu scares in 2006 and 2007.

As a result, millions of people have been vaccinated against a mild illness, and money that could have been used to prevent and treat major killers such as heart disease has been squandered.
The claims, which emerged during the first of several Council of Europe hearings into the handling of the swine flu pandemic, were strongly rejected by the WHO.

Following the organisation’s declaration of a pandemic, the Department of Health warned of 65,000 deaths, set up a special advice line and website, and suspended normal rules so anti-flu drugs could be given without prescription.
But with just 250 or so deaths in Britain and 14,000 worldwide, the WHO is being asked to account for its actions.
The Government is now trying to off-load millions of jabs it ordered at the height of the scare. Sources say it is even considering giving some doses away for free.
Wolfgang Wodarg, former head of health at the Council of Europe, the Strasbourg-based ‘senate’
responsible for the European Court of Human Rights, said vaccine contracts were put in place in 2007, when it was feared the more lethal bird flu virus would mutate into human form.
Drug companies, which spent up to £2.5billion developing a vaccine, then pushed their interests within the WHO, leading to the definition of a pandemic being softened and an outbreak declared.
He told the hearing: ‘It was stated in panic- stricken terms that this was a flu that could threaten humanity and a great number of humans could fall ill.
‘This is why billions of dollars of medications were bought.
Dr Wodarg, an expert on the spread of disease, said that the change in definition made it possible for a worldwide pandemic to be declared and for the pharmaceutical companies to cash in.
Also giving evidence, Professor Ulrich Keil, a WHO adviser on heart disease, said the decision had led to a ‘gigantic misallocation’ of health budgets.
‘We know the great killers are hypertension, smoking, high cholesterol, high body mass index, physical inactivity and low fruit and vegetable intake,’ he said.
‘In spite of all these facts, governments instead wasted huge amounts of money by investing in pandemic scenarios whose evidence base is weak.’
But Dr Kieji Fukuda, the WHO’s top flu expert, rejected the allegations. ‘We do not wait until (these global virus outbreaks) have developed and we see that lots of people are dying,’ he said.
‘What we try to do is take preventive actions. Our purpose is to try to provide guidance, to reduce harm.’

January 19, 2010

International Hearings Begin On “Falsified” Swine Flu Pandemic.

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010

“Greatest medical scandal of the century” to come under scrutiny”

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, a 47 nation body encompassing democratically elected members of parliament, has begun hearings to investigate whether the H1N1 swine flu pandemic was falsified or exaggerated in an attempt to profit from vaccine sales.

A PACE resolution, passed last month, gave context to the hearings which began yesterday in Strasbourg.

“In order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines against flu, pharmaceutical companies influenced scientists and official agencies, responsible for public health standards to alarm governments worldwide and make them squander tight health resources for inefficient vaccine strategies and needlessly expose millions of healthy people to the risk of an unknown amount of side-effects of insufficiently tested vaccines. The “bird-flu”-campaign (2005/06) combined with the “swine-flu”-campaign seem to have caused a great deal of damage not only to some vaccinated patients and to public health-budgets, but to the credibility and accountability of important international health-agencies.”

Heading the hearings will be chairman of the Health Committee of PACE, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former German lawmaker, a medical doctor and epidemiologist. Wodarg has referred to the swine flu pandemic as “one of the greatest medical scandals of the century.”

Wodarg charges that the WHO altered the definition of a pandemic from an outbreak in several continents at once with an above-average death rate, to one where the spread of the disease is constant.
The Parliamentary inquiry will determine if a “falsified pandemic” was declared by WHO in June 2009 on the advice of medical advisors, many of whom have close financial ties to the very pharmaceutical giants – GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Novartis, – that produced the H1N1 vaccines.

It will also look into the controversy surrounding the fact that two shots were initially advised when it was later revealed that one dose was entirely suitable.

Pharmaceutical companies are thought to have made a profit of somewhere in the region of $7.5-$10 billion on H1N1 vaccines. The worldwide death toll from H1N1 is thought to be around 13,500, just over a third of the number who die from regular flu every year in the U.S. alone.

PACE has noted that the alleged conspiracy could have exposed “millions of healthy people to the risk of side-effects of insufficiently tested vaccines”.

Many countries have begun offloading huge stockpiles of unused vaccines and canceling outstanding orders. The latest to do so is Greece, where the government had announced that it would make H1N1 vaccination mandatory.
PACE will also hold a debate next week entitled ‘Faked pandemics, a threat to health’, to be attended by representatives of the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the European pharmaceutical industry.

“Unlike the European Parliament, it has no decision-making powers, but, as was demonstrated by its report into extraordinary rendition, it does have the power to make life uncomfortable for the powers that be,” notes the Irish TImes.

Related Reading: H1N1-GATE: Big Pharma, WHO crafted ‘organized panic,’ European health head claims

Blog at WordPress.com.