From Hell To Veins

June 4, 2010

H1N1 Vaccine Conflicts Of Interest & Conspiracy At The Who

Click for Population Reduction Documentation.

My Commentary:
A beta test in making buck while ‘attempting’ to FORCE mass populations into taking a dangerous vaccine. All in the name of depopulating the planet. This ties into to the U.S.A.’s NEW health care system / LAW, because you can guarantee that citizens will be required by LAW to follow these criminal lettered agencies vaccine recommendations once the health care LAW is up and running full swing.

Conflicts of Interest
WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies”

Deborah Cohen, features editor, BMJ, Philip Carter, journalist, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, London

dcohen@bmj.com

Key scientists advising the World Health Organization on planning for an influenza pandemic had done paid work for pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were preparing. These conflicts of interest have never been publicly disclosed by WHO, and WHO has dismissed inquiries into its handling of the A/H1N1 pandemic as “conspiracy theories.” Deborah Cohen and Philip Carter investigate

Next week marks the first anniversary of the official declaration of the influenza A/H1N1 pandemic. On 11 June 2009 Dr Margaret Chan, the director general of the World Health Organization, announced to the world’s media: “I have conferred with leading influenza experts, virologists, and public health officials. In line with procedures set out in the International Health Regulations, I have sought guidance and advice from an Emergency Committee established for this purpose. On the basis of available evidence, and these expert assessments of the evidence, the scientific criteria for an influenza pandemic have been met…The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.”

It was the culmination of 10 years of pandemic preparedness planning for WHO—years of committee meetings with experts flown in from around the world and reams of draft documents offering guidance to governments. But one year on, governments that took advice from WHO are unwinding their vaccine contracts, and billions of dollars’ worth of stockpiled oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza)—bought from health budgets already under tight constraints—lie unused in warehouses around the world.

A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered evidence that raises troubling questions about how WHO managed conflicts of interest among the scientists who advised its pandemic planning, and about the transparency of the science underlying its advice to governments. Was it appropriate for WHO to take advice from experts who had declarable financial and research ties with pharmaceutical companies producing antivirals and influenza vaccines? Why was key WHO guidance authored by an influenza expert who had received payment for other work from Roche, manufacturers of oseltamivir, and GlaxoSmithKline, manufacturers of zanamivir? And why does the composition of the emergency committee from which Chan sought guidance remain a secret known only to those within WHO? We are left wondering whether major public health organisations are able to effectively manage the conflicts of interest that are inherent in medical science.

… Article Continues HERE.

Advertisements

April 30, 2010

WHO Issues Warning About Corruption Of Pharmaceutical Industry

STOP THE PRESS!!!
POT CALLS KETTLE BLACK!!!!!!

I have to issue a ‘reality check’ to the corrupt Rockefeller created and run World Health Organization. MANY, MANY of us have been ‘issuing warnings’ about the corrupt pharma industry since it’s inception. Read the ‘Drug Story‘. It was first written in the 1930’s (revised through the 1940’s) and is even MORE relevant today then it was when it was first written. To the WHO, DON’T try and warn some of these people. Not even the World Health Organization calling the ‘kettle black will keep these people from running out and allowing these corrupt corporations to pump contaminates into their veins! Or that of their children. They won’t even listen to you WHO, but of course, those at the WHO already know that.


WHO issues warning about corruption of pharmaceutical industry

Friday, April 30, 2010 by: David Gutierrez, staff writer
Natural News

(NaturalNews) The World Health Organization (WHO) recently issued a fact sheet warning about the corruption and unethical practices that are endemic to every step of the pharmaceuticals business.

“Corruption in the pharmaceutical sector occurs throughout all stages of the medicine chain, from research and development to dispensing and promotion,” the fact sheet reads.

The medicine chain refers to each step involved in getting drugs into the hands of patients, including drug creation, regulation, management and consumption. According to WHO data, unethical practices such as bribery, falsification of evidence, and mismanagement of conflicts of interest are “common throughout the medicine chain.”

The fact sheet also highlights other forms of corruption specific to particular steps in the chain. For example, clinical trials may be conducted without proper regulatory approval, royalties may be collected through manipulation or disregard of the patent system, and products may be registered with incorrect or insufficient information. Drugs may be produced through substandard or counterfeit methods, leading to products that are less effective at best, and hazardous at worst. Corruption can also occur during the drug inspection process, allowing such shoddy products to be given a government seal of approval.

Once drugs have been produced for the market, corruption can occur via the selection of non-essential drugs for different governments’ lists of “essential” medications. Unethical marketing strategies — both legal and illegal — are common throughout the drug business. Vendors may collaborate with pharmaceutical companies and doctors might be unduly influenced to dispense drugs to gain the greatest profit rather than to produce the greatest benefit for the patient.

This corruption can have serious consequences, the WHO warns.

“Medicines are only beneficial when they are safe, of high quality, and properly distributed and used by patients,” the fact sheet says.

Most obviously, corruption in the drug business can divert medicines away from where they are most needed, while the production of substandard pharmaceutical products can be dangerous to patients’ health.
“Diverted, counterfeit and substandard medicines have been identified in markets of both rich and poor countries,” the fact sheet says.
“Such practices lead to patient suffering and have direct life or death consequences.”
Corruption in the drug business also wastes public resources and “[erodes] public and donor confidence in public institutions.” In Third World countries, as much as 89 percent of health care spending is lost to corruption, while unethical practices cost First World countries an estimated $12 billion to $23 billion a year. Worldwide, this amounts to a loss of 10 to 25 percent of all drug procurement spending, or nearly $190 billion.

The WHO notes that corruption is so widespread in part because medicines pass through a large number of intermediaries before they reach the patients who need them. Each extra step provides an opportunity for corruption to take place, ultimately driving up the cost of the medicine or diverting it toward the wrong recipients.

Corruption is especially hard to fight because most cases go unreported. The WHO attributes this both to fear of retaliation on the part of whistleblowers, and also the institutionalization of corruption “to the point where people feel powerless to influence change in their countries.”

According to the WHO, countries most likely to be plagued with corruption in the pharmaceutical industry are those without “appropriate legislation or regulation of medicines; enforcement mechanisms for laws, regulations and administrative procedures; [or] conflict of interest management.”

“A lack of transparency and accountability within the medicines chain can also contribute to unethical practices and corruption.”

Corruption has real health impacts, the fact sheet emphasizes. For example, countries with more corruption have higher child mortality rates than other countries with similar health standards.

As part of its efforts to reduce unethical practices in the medicines chain, the WHO launched the Good Governance for Medicines program in 2004. This program helps countries evaluate their vulnerability to corruption, then plan and implement programs to reduce it.

April 7, 2010

Mass H1N1 Immunization ‘Inappropriate’

My commentary:
This truly is a ‘Johnny-Come-Lately’ news article. The CDC / WHO were all to familiar with what this expert has to say about the H1N1 vaccination program and shot YET, these evil SOB’s pushed it onto children and pregnant women! Wall Street media did all it could to shut down and tune out ALL of the ‘experts’ that were saying the same as this expert and turn on full blast all the BS pushing the safety of the vaccine. One should ask… “Why is there NEVER two sides of the story when the story relates to vaccines? I will explain.

I never expect ANYONE who has NOT heard the news that vaccinations ARE a POPULATION CONTROL TOOL by those running the planet into the ground, to simply believe that. But don’t sit there and call me names like a spoiled child UNTIL YOU HAVE RESEARCHED IT FOR YOURSELF!

Here is a start. Ecoscience IS AN OFFICIAL US POLICY HANDBOOK. It describes how vaccines are to be used as a population control tool AMONG OTHER TECHNIQUES!! Order it, read it. Yes! The program is hidden IN PLAIN SIGHT!

Mass H1N1 immunisation ‘inappropriate’
Special thanks to Labvirus.com

6 April 2010 | by Simone Roberts Print this article Comments Share this article

The mass vaccination program for swine flu has come under fire from an infectious disease expert who says the risk of serious side effects was greater than any potential benefit for half the Australian population.

Writing in the latest issue of Australian Prescriber, Professor Peter Collignon, director of the Infectious Diseases Unit and Microbiology Department at The Canberra Hospital, said the Government’s response to the virus was “inappropriate”, fuelled by fears about its spread that were out of proportion to the real threat posed by the disease.

“Overall, swine flu has been associated with fewer deaths than seasonal influenza and is of low virulence,” he wrote.

Professor Collignon said the risk of side effects from the vaccine was greater than any potential benefit for 50 per cent of the Australian population, who were likely already immune because of pre-existing immunity or recent infection.

“In any mass vaccination campaign, those who are already immune are unlikely to get additional benefits from the vaccine, but remain at risk of adverse effects,” he wrote.

“In young people without risk factors, the rates of death and complications last winter from swine flu were very low and are similar to the risk of serious vaccine-associated adverse effects such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and anaphylaxis.”

According to Prof Collignon, around 50 per cent of people who received the H1N1 vaccine in the Australian trial had mild to moderate systemic adverse effects and 1.7 per cent had adverse effects recorded as severe.

In children, 20 per cent had moderate to severe systemic adverse effects after receiving a single 15 microgram dose of vaccine.

“It is very important that we make sure we do more good than harm with any vaccine,” Prof Collignon said, calling for large, prospective long-term studies on the safety and efficacy of influenza vaccines before embarking on further mass immunisation programs.

Prof Collignon also criticised the use of multidose vials in the vaccination program, saying it put patients at “needless additional risk” of contracting infections such as Staphylococcus aureus, hepatitis B and HIV.

Article

March 31, 2010

A Big Pharma Insider Comes Clean

John Virapen, an ex-Eli-Lilly-executive and author of the book “Side Effect: Death” (published in Sweden and Germany)

LISTEN TO AUDIO POD CAST FOR AN EYE OPENER!
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/johnmack/2007/12/20/side-effects-death

March 30, 2010

The H1N1 Vaccine Insert THEY DIDN’T WANT TO SHOW YOU.

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm182404.pdf

UP DATE:
Since posting the above link, the FDA has REMOVED ANY and ALL h1n1 flu shot insert information from their website. WHY?

If you want to know HOW EASY it is for ONE person to make a difference let me tell you a ‘true’ story…

I was talking with a business partner of mine and I told her NOT to get the H1N1 vaccine until she had read the insert that came with the vaccine. This, during the fall flu season when government and media was yelling ‘fire in the theater’ from the rooftops that we all had to get the shot or else we could all parish. Well. February rolled around and I caught back up with her and she said to me… “You know I would have never even thought to have asked for the insert, I want to thank you!” I said to her… See how they have us trained? She continued… Her, clients ALL said to her… “You’re going to get the shot aren’t you?” I told ALL of my clients to do the same, see the insert first. She said… They found out what I found out, if you want to see the insert you WILL BE DENIED.

All those people who would have gotten the shot ‘wised up’ and found out the same people yelling ‘fire in the theater’ did want ANYONE to see what information was in the insert. Not that I would trust big pharma’s inserts to begin with.

I find 8.1 very interesting when it comes to pregnant women. The insert has quite a different take then what the main stream medical complex was selling on TV, radio and print.

The corporate media is NOT your friend.

World Health Organization’s Loss Of Public’s Trust An Exercise In Damage Control.

Corporate media in February 2010, tried one of the lamest attempts ever to prop up the Rockefeller created World Health Organization by publishing praises from the ‘Pharmacological Industrial Complex’s’ very own so-called ‘experts’ saying that the WHO’s raising the pandemic level to SIX was ‘needed’ for the greater good. Even though at the same time, ‘good guys’ in the EU were investigating the WHO for ‘fraudulently’ distorting facts in order to a.) insure MASSIVE vaccine sales to governments by the companies who’s very own ‘experts’ were praising the WHO in the February massive damage control campaign and b.) to use a level six pandemic to empower governments particularly in the U.S. and E.U. to have ‘authority’ to cease all kinds of control in the name of a ‘national emergency’.

In the latest attempt to exercise ‘damage control’, corporate media shifts gears and is doing an about-face-march by slapping the WHO on the wrist and crying that the WHO indeed made a mistake and now the public refuses to take big pharma’s contaminated vaccines. Of course, nowhere in the article does the world ‘criminality’ ONCE even appear.

WHO Accused Of Losing Public’s Confidence.

RELATED:
For those who have ANY DOUBTS about Rockefeller created World Health Organization’s ‘criminality’ in the swine flu hoax see…
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg WHO FAUD INVESTIGATION

… and

Swine 11! Government Sponsored Terrorism.

March 10, 2010

Government Says H1N1 Safe, Yet Clinical Trials Still On Going.

Aren’t vaccines SUPPOSED to be deemed ‘safe and effective’ AFTER undergoing clinical trials? Why does the ‘mainstream medical’ (MSM) industrial complex completely ignore this fact?

The government ‘approving’ the H1N1 vaccine as safe and effective before these set of trails,, makes all these trials a NULL and VOID joke.

From labvirus.com
Trials

February 20, 2010

“NO FLU VACCINE HAS EVER WORKED” Expert Explains the Flu Vaccine Deception

My Commentary:
It’s awfully hard for the PRO vaccive detractors to ignore this EXPERT, let alone say he can in no way know what he is talking about . His comments on flu vaccines begs the question. If the establishment is lying about the flu vaccines, and one has to be in ULTRA denial NOT to get that, we as a society have to ask… “Well, what else are they lying to us about when it comes to vaccines?”

THINK people!

Expert Explains the Flu Vaccine Deception and the Swine Flu Hoax
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
Dr. Shiv Chopra was a drug company insider, and also worked for what is now Health Canada — the Canadian equivalent of the FDA. He is uniquely qualified to explain why no flu vaccine has ever worked, and that swine flu and avian flu are nothing more than hoaxes.

Posted by: Dr. Mercola

January 27, 2010

Drug firms ‘drove down’ swine flu pandemic warning to recoup £billions

Source:
Mail Online

I just want to add a quick comment. The Mail Online wrote a hit piece on Dr. Wakefiled. If Big Pharma has the pull to tell the WHO and CDC how high to jump at the snap of a finger do you really think Dr. Wakefield is getting a fair hearing?

Last updated at 7:49 AM on 27th January 2010

Drug companies manipulated the World Health Organisation into downgrading its definition of a pandemic so they could cash in on a swine flu outbreak, it is claimed.
An inquiry heard yesterday that the WHO allegedly softened its criteria for declaring a H1N1 flu pandemic last spring – just weeks before announcing there was a worldwide outbreak.
Critics said the decision was driven by pharmaceutical companies desperate to recoup the billions of pounds they had invested in researching and developing pandemic vaccines after the bird flu scares in 2006 and 2007.

As a result, millions of people have been vaccinated against a mild illness, and money that could have been used to prevent and treat major killers such as heart disease has been squandered.
The claims, which emerged during the first of several Council of Europe hearings into the handling of the swine flu pandemic, were strongly rejected by the WHO.

Following the organisation’s declaration of a pandemic, the Department of Health warned of 65,000 deaths, set up a special advice line and website, and suspended normal rules so anti-flu drugs could be given without prescription.
But with just 250 or so deaths in Britain and 14,000 worldwide, the WHO is being asked to account for its actions.
The Government is now trying to off-load millions of jabs it ordered at the height of the scare. Sources say it is even considering giving some doses away for free.
Wolfgang Wodarg, former head of health at the Council of Europe, the Strasbourg-based ‘senate’
responsible for the European Court of Human Rights, said vaccine contracts were put in place in 2007, when it was feared the more lethal bird flu virus would mutate into human form.
Drug companies, which spent up to £2.5billion developing a vaccine, then pushed their interests within the WHO, leading to the definition of a pandemic being softened and an outbreak declared.
He told the hearing: ‘It was stated in panic- stricken terms that this was a flu that could threaten humanity and a great number of humans could fall ill.
‘This is why billions of dollars of medications were bought.
Dr Wodarg, an expert on the spread of disease, said that the change in definition made it possible for a worldwide pandemic to be declared and for the pharmaceutical companies to cash in.
Also giving evidence, Professor Ulrich Keil, a WHO adviser on heart disease, said the decision had led to a ‘gigantic misallocation’ of health budgets.
‘We know the great killers are hypertension, smoking, high cholesterol, high body mass index, physical inactivity and low fruit and vegetable intake,’ he said.
‘In spite of all these facts, governments instead wasted huge amounts of money by investing in pandemic scenarios whose evidence base is weak.’
But Dr Kieji Fukuda, the WHO’s top flu expert, rejected the allegations. ‘We do not wait until (these global virus outbreaks) have developed and we see that lots of people are dying,’ he said.
‘What we try to do is take preventive actions. Our purpose is to try to provide guidance, to reduce harm.’

Blog at WordPress.com.