From Hell To Veins

November 8, 2011

2009 H1N1 flu pandemic ‘deaths’ of children were actually caused by MRSA

Editor’s Note:
You got to love this one. Not just for the fact that the mainstream media and their partner in crime ‘big government’ yelled “FIRE!!!!” in the theater over this totally debunked swine flu hoax to push dangerous untested flu shots onto the general public. That’s not even the best part in this latest 2009 swine flu hoax development.

The best part of this latest revelation is that, even after the medical industrial complex ADMITS the the so-called h1n1 deaths of these poor children were NOT EVEN FROM THE H1N1 VIRUS, they have NO interest what-so-ever investigating what is causing this rise in MRSA and ARE USING THIS LATEST FINDING TO PUSH VACCINES!!!!!

It doesn’t get anymore screwed up then that!!! Where are these so-called medical professionals ‘profession’ at anyway? The gutter?
———————————————————————

Truth comes out: 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic ‘deaths’ of children were actually caused by MRSA

Natural News (for all sourced links)

(NaturalNews) Remember two years ago when every news show featured hysterical reports about the so-called H1N1 pandemic and how the supposed killer flu was striking down healthy kids? True, many previously healthy children became critically ill, developing severe pneumonia and respiratory failure. And some tragically died after being diagnosed with H1N1. But was that really the accurate explanation of what caused their death?

According to the largest nationwide investigation to date of the flu in children who became critically ill, scientists from Children’s Hospital Boston have found another reason to explain the severity of the youngsters illness. It turns out that it most likely wasn’t H1N1 alone that caused healthy children to become so ill many died.

Instead, these kids were unknowingly infected with something else. That additional infection, the superbug known as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), spiked the risk for flu-related deaths 8-fold in children who were otherwise believed to be totally healthy before they became ill.

Almost all of these children who were found to be infected with the superbug were immediately treated with vancomycin, considered to be best treatment for MRSA. Yet they died despite being administered this powerful antibiotic and their deaths were blamed on the flu. But the new research suggests it was the MRSA that played a huge role in killing these children.

“There’s more risk for MRSA to become invasive in the presence of flu or other viruses,” study leader Adrienne Randolph, MD, MsC, of the Division of Critical Care Medicine at Children’s Hospital Boston. Said in a statement to the media. “These deaths in co-infected children are a warning sign.” He added this is especially alarming given the rising rates of MRSA infections being carried widely among children.

“It is not common in the U.S. to lose a previously healthy child to pneumonia,” Randolph said. “Unfortunately, these children had necrotizing pneumonia eating away at their tissue and killing off whole areas of the lung. They looked like immunocompromised patients in the way MRSA went through their body. It’s not that flu alone can’t kill – it can – but in most cases children with flu alone survived.”

MRSA risk continues to spread

Sixty percent of the youngsters investigated for the new study already had sometimes serious health problems before contracting the flu. But of the 251 children (30 percent) previously healthy children included in the research, the only risk factor that was identified which likely contributed to their increased risk of dying was a diagnosis of a MRSA infection in the lung. The researchers expressed surprise that the antibiotic used to treat the MRSA-infected children didn’t work and suggested the drug couldn’t penetrate the lungs or the disease moved too rapidly.

Recent studies have shown a worrisome rise in the number of youngsters who are carriers of MRSA. A 2010 study published in Pediatrics found that the number of children hospitalized for MRSA infections increased from 2 in 1,000 admissions in 1999 to 21 in 1,000 admissions by 2008. The cause appears to be the never-ending and growing use of antibiotics in people and animals. “The more antibiotics we take, the more we colonize ourselves with antibiotic-resistant organisms such as MRSA,” Randolph noted.

Curiously, the researchers are not emphasizing going after the cause and spread of MRSA infections as much as they are using their findings to push for flu shots. Their study, just published in the journal Pediatrics, promotes flu vaccination among all children aged 6 months and older.

Advertisements

May 12, 2010

Population Reduction And Recent Vaccine Patents

My Commentary:
Below is Dr. True Ott’s investigation into U.S.,and perhaps, international patents of H1N1 lab created virus structures by Baxter et al. This ‘claim’ is no great revelation to this blog and for those who follow it.

For those who do NOT want to do ANY research into these FACTS but, simply want to bury their heads in the sand by saying the ‘sleep trigger’ phrase, ‘CONSPIRACY THEORY’. I’ve got some real bad news for you. Your denial will NOT save you from these mad creatures running the planet right now.

Here’s something to think about. Recently Pfizer in a law suit ADMITTED (as if no big deal) that the pharmaceutical industry is hard at work making these genetically modified DNA / RNA viral structures here in the USA. Unfortunately for Pfiser, the rest of the world STILL believes these viruses need to be created in at least a ‘level 4’ bio hazard lab.

Dr. True Ott in studying the Novartis flu mist patent stumbled upon one of the key FACTS in regards to the population reduction plan as outlined at the Club of Rome. Dr. Ott does NOT even know what he stumbled upon. I have been trying to make this point as clear as I can, yet, even when someone doing ‘GREAT’ research on this has a MAJOR key to the plan right in the palm of their hand, they can NOT see what I have been trying to get across to the public all along. The lab virus bioweapons, that are being used are STRICTLY designed to have a ‘limited’ kill ratio. I will NOT stop repeating this, those who have been planning the population reduction operation CAN IN NO WAY AFFORD A WILD FIRE PANDEMIC (their words). These designer viral structures DO HAVE, either a self-destruct mechanism built into them OR, they will have a viral structure which will limit the next viral mutation(s). At least that was the way it was explained. The reason for all of this, is that these bioweapon viruses are being designed to kill ONLY enough people to ‘scare’ the rest of the population into ACCEPTING A MANDATORY VACCINE POLICY. The up coming mandatory vaccine program IS THE POPULATION REDUCTION PROGRAM. The entire health care system NOW put in place was put in place for one purpose only, POPULATION REDUCTION. This is where the ‘system’ needed to facilitate A CONTROLLED population operation will take place. Where the overseers can CHOOSE WHO LIVES AND WHO DIES, and control the entire operation just like a video war game. (their words) Also, the very reason why influenza viruses were chosen for the man made pandemic operation was that once mandatory vaccines were accepted the vaccines would be for something that would need to be taken ‘annually’ and NOT as a one time deal.

Now, I have been trying to get this message through the thickest of heads and finally Bill Gates said the exact same thing. That, population reduction WILL occur through the (new) health care system AND vaccines.

Now, with all that said, will these lab viruses spiral out of control? I can’t say they will not. However, I DO KNOW the people responsible for these viral projects think they can control the outbreaks.

Special thanks to Labvirus.com
VIDEO Virus And Vaccine Patented By Baxter Since ’07

VIEW THE PATENT APPLICATIONS HERE:
Patent Application for H1N1 Virus: US20080069821A1
Patent Application Link
http://www.google.com/patents?id=EGSoAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false
Related US Patent #5,698,433 (1997 version):
METHOD FOR PRODUCING INFLUENZA VIRUS AND VACCINE (assignee: Baxter)

What is claimed is:
1. An isolated polypeptide, wherein said polypeptide is selected from the group consisting of: a) a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence encoded by the nucleotide sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NOS:21-26 or 33-38 or 45; b) a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NOS:27-32 or 39-44; c) the mature form of a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NOS: 27-32 or 39-44; d) a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence encoded by a polynucleotide which hybridizes under highly stringent conditions to a polynucleotide comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding (a) (b) or (c); and e) a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence having at least 90% sequence identity to the polypeptide of (b).

2. An immunogenic composition comprising an immunologically effective amount of at least one polypeptide of claim 1.

3. An isolated antibody that specifically binds the polypeptide of claim 1.

4. A method for stimulating the immune system of an individual to produce a protective immune response against influenza virus, the method comprising administering to the individual an immunologically effective amount of the polypeptide of claim 1 in a physiologically acceptable carrier.

5. A recombinant influenza virus comprising the polypeptide of claim 1.

6. An immunogenic composition comprising an immunologically effective amount of the recombinant influenza virus of claim 5.

7. A method for stimulating the immune system of an individual to produce a protective immune response against influenza virus, the method comprising administering to the individual an immunologically effective amount of the recombinant influenza virus of claim 5 in a physiologically acceptable carrier.

8. An isolated polynucleotide, wherein said polynucleotide is selected from the group consisting of: a) a polynucleotide comprising the nucleotide sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NOS: 21-26 or 33-38 or 45, or a complementary sequence thereof; b) a polynucleotide comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NOS: 27-32 or 39-44, or a complementary nucleotide sequence thereof; c) a polynucleotide which hybridizes under highly stringent conditions over substantially the entire length of the polynucleotide of (a); and d) a polynucleotide comprising a nucleotide sequence having at least 98% sequence identity to the polynucleotide of (a).

9. An immunogenic composition comprising at least one polynucleotide of claim 8.

10. A cell comprising at least one polynucleotide of claim 8.

11. A vector comprising the polynucleotide of claim 8.

12. The vector of claim 11, wherein the vector is a plasmid, a cosmid, a phage, a virus, or a fragment of a virus.

13. The vector of claim 12, wherein the vector is an expression vector.

14. A cell comprising the vector of claim 13.

15. An influenza virus comprising one or more polynucleotides of claim 8.

16. The virus of claim 15, wherein the virus is a reassortant virus.

17. A 6:2 reassortant influenza virus, wherein said virus comprises 6 internal genome segments from A/Ann Arbor/6/60 and 2 genome segments that encode an HA and/or a NA polypeptide selected from the group consisting of: the polypeptides of SEQ ID NOS:27-32, and 39-44.

18. A method of producing a reassortant influenza virus, the method comprising: culturing the cell of claim 14 in a suitable culture medium under conditions permitting expression of said polynucleotide; and, isolating the reassortant influenza virus from a cell population comprising said cell or the medium.

19. An immunogenic composition comprising an immunologically effective amount of the reassortant influenza virus of claim 17.

There are 19 more claims which cannot fit into this description. Please check the first link above for the rest.

April 7, 2010

Mass H1N1 Immunization ‘Inappropriate’

My commentary:
This truly is a ‘Johnny-Come-Lately’ news article. The CDC / WHO were all to familiar with what this expert has to say about the H1N1 vaccination program and shot YET, these evil SOB’s pushed it onto children and pregnant women! Wall Street media did all it could to shut down and tune out ALL of the ‘experts’ that were saying the same as this expert and turn on full blast all the BS pushing the safety of the vaccine. One should ask… “Why is there NEVER two sides of the story when the story relates to vaccines? I will explain.

I never expect ANYONE who has NOT heard the news that vaccinations ARE a POPULATION CONTROL TOOL by those running the planet into the ground, to simply believe that. But don’t sit there and call me names like a spoiled child UNTIL YOU HAVE RESEARCHED IT FOR YOURSELF!

Here is a start. Ecoscience IS AN OFFICIAL US POLICY HANDBOOK. It describes how vaccines are to be used as a population control tool AMONG OTHER TECHNIQUES!! Order it, read it. Yes! The program is hidden IN PLAIN SIGHT!

Mass H1N1 immunisation ‘inappropriate’
Special thanks to Labvirus.com

6 April 2010 | by Simone Roberts Print this article Comments Share this article

The mass vaccination program for swine flu has come under fire from an infectious disease expert who says the risk of serious side effects was greater than any potential benefit for half the Australian population.

Writing in the latest issue of Australian Prescriber, Professor Peter Collignon, director of the Infectious Diseases Unit and Microbiology Department at The Canberra Hospital, said the Government’s response to the virus was “inappropriate”, fuelled by fears about its spread that were out of proportion to the real threat posed by the disease.

“Overall, swine flu has been associated with fewer deaths than seasonal influenza and is of low virulence,” he wrote.

Professor Collignon said the risk of side effects from the vaccine was greater than any potential benefit for 50 per cent of the Australian population, who were likely already immune because of pre-existing immunity or recent infection.

“In any mass vaccination campaign, those who are already immune are unlikely to get additional benefits from the vaccine, but remain at risk of adverse effects,” he wrote.

“In young people without risk factors, the rates of death and complications last winter from swine flu were very low and are similar to the risk of serious vaccine-associated adverse effects such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and anaphylaxis.”

According to Prof Collignon, around 50 per cent of people who received the H1N1 vaccine in the Australian trial had mild to moderate systemic adverse effects and 1.7 per cent had adverse effects recorded as severe.

In children, 20 per cent had moderate to severe systemic adverse effects after receiving a single 15 microgram dose of vaccine.

“It is very important that we make sure we do more good than harm with any vaccine,” Prof Collignon said, calling for large, prospective long-term studies on the safety and efficacy of influenza vaccines before embarking on further mass immunisation programs.

Prof Collignon also criticised the use of multidose vials in the vaccination program, saying it put patients at “needless additional risk” of contracting infections such as Staphylococcus aureus, hepatitis B and HIV.

Article

March 30, 2010

The H1N1 Vaccine Insert THEY DIDN’T WANT TO SHOW YOU.

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm182404.pdf

UP DATE:
Since posting the above link, the FDA has REMOVED ANY and ALL h1n1 flu shot insert information from their website. WHY?

If you want to know HOW EASY it is for ONE person to make a difference let me tell you a ‘true’ story…

I was talking with a business partner of mine and I told her NOT to get the H1N1 vaccine until she had read the insert that came with the vaccine. This, during the fall flu season when government and media was yelling ‘fire in the theater’ from the rooftops that we all had to get the shot or else we could all parish. Well. February rolled around and I caught back up with her and she said to me… “You know I would have never even thought to have asked for the insert, I want to thank you!” I said to her… See how they have us trained? She continued… Her, clients ALL said to her… “You’re going to get the shot aren’t you?” I told ALL of my clients to do the same, see the insert first. She said… They found out what I found out, if you want to see the insert you WILL BE DENIED.

All those people who would have gotten the shot ‘wised up’ and found out the same people yelling ‘fire in the theater’ did want ANYONE to see what information was in the insert. Not that I would trust big pharma’s inserts to begin with.

I find 8.1 very interesting when it comes to pregnant women. The insert has quite a different take then what the main stream medical complex was selling on TV, radio and print.

The corporate media is NOT your friend.

March 2, 2010

Even Pro Vaccine Admits H1N1 Vaccine Failure

Even Pro Vaccine Admits H1N1 Vaccine Failure Yet, ‘Main Stream Medical’ (MSM) Still Pushes THE Shot! Do you smell a rat?

My Commentary:
One of the worlds leading virologist / vaccine pusher and leading consultant to the CDC / WHO along with a number of countries Dr. Henry L Niman admits the very vaccine he pushed on various alternative news radio programs was a BIG FAT FAILURE! But, that’s not the WHOLE STORY…

Niman puts the blame of vaccine failure on Tamiflu and Peramivir for increases in H274Y case severity and NOT on the vaccine itself.

“Similarly, the increases in H274Y raised concerns that cases could become more severe because of initial treatment with Tamiflu or subsequent treatment with Peramivir would have limited effect. Thus, the resistance could limit treatment options, which would become a serious problem H274Y became widespread.”

-Dr Henry Niman

Which ‘MAYBE’ true but this begs asking an even more obvious question…
Dr. Niman is a virus recombining expert. Why does he continue to write off the possibility that a serious viral outbreak could occur by SIMPLY giving the population one of his damn vaccines with a LAB virus combination that later recombines with whatever virus combination is floating around in the air. To me anyway, that seems like a much greater threat to the population than a Tamiflu resistant virus.

Vaccine Failure In Severe H1N1 Cases
Dr. Henry L Niman
Recombinomics Commentary 15:44
March 2, 2010
The recent reports of vaccine failures in severe H1N1 cases in Europe and the United States have caused concern. Vaccine failure in general was expected because California/7 is a rare sub-clade with significant differences with the consensus sequence and there have been reports of low reactors which had a single amino acid difference with the consensus sequence.

However, the finding of frequent vaccine failures in severe cases has created additional concern. The vaccine was expected to provide some protection which would minimize severe cases. Although the vaccine against the 1918 virus offered better protection against 2009 pandemic challenge in mice, the current vaccine still offered some protection. However, the protection experiments used H1N1 from the earlier waves, and the emerging H1N1 may have additional changes, limiting the protection further.

In the fall wave, D225G/N was rare, but strongly associated with fatal cases. The finding that D225G created a low reactor led to concerns that an emerging H1N1 would have D255G/N because of selection pressure. The emergence of D225G was also seen in a 1919 isolate from London, which raised additional concerns regarding parallels with 1918/1919.

Similarly, the increases in H274Y raised concerns that cases could become more severe because of initial treatment with Tamiflu or subsequent treatment with Peramivir would have limited effect. Thus, the resistance could limit treatment options, which would become a serious problem H274Y became widespread. Production capacity for Relenza is significantly below Tamiflu levels, and there were shortages of the liquid pediatric Tamiflu in the fall outbreak, in spite of recommendations to limit Tamiflu treatment to patients with underlying conditions.

A winter/spring of 2010 outbreak would seriously strain antiviral stockpiles if a more severe / fatal H1N1 was in circulation, especially if it had H274Y. More severe cases would also strain health care delivery because these cases require ventilators and ECMO machines which are in limited supply, as are ICU beds.

Thus, a sharp increase in severe cases would significantly impact health care delivery and create more dire situations than were seen in the fall. These issues would be exacerbated by a public that was told that the pandemic was mild, over, or an epidemic. A realization that this information was false could create additional problems.

Sequence data on these severe cases in patients who had been vaccinated would be useful. The vaccine failure appears to be widespread, so generation of appropriate sequences, including those from lung from patients who failed anti-viral treatment, should be straightforward.

Article

December 7, 2009

Flu Vaccine Clinic Turnout Lower Than Expected HAHAHA!!

Filed under: HOME — nwqfk @ 3:15 p12
Tags: , ,

My Commentary:
When the establishment gave the green light to finally give out all the vaccines (at 25 bucks a pop) THEY HAD SITTING ON THE SHELF not many showed up.

What’s really telling about this is Boston.com’s comment section to this article. It seems the floodgates had opened to the flu shot opposition and Boston.com apparently shut it down as it was getting started. Go figure?

Boston.com
Boston public health officials had hoped to inoculate 5,000 residents in Hyde Park yesterday against H1N1 – and another 5,000 today in West Roxbury – as part of a community vaccination drive that targets people most at risk for getting swine flu. The H1N1 vaccine is only being offered to those at greatest risk of complications and viral illness – people age 3 to 24, and adults 25 through 64 who suffer from asthma, heart disease, diabetes, and other chronic conditions. Regular seasonal flu shots were not offered this weekend.

By 3 p.m. yesterday, 715 people in Hyde Park had gotten their shots or nasal spray.
Full Article

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.