From Hell To Veins

July 17, 2012

THE FDA IS A PRIVATE ORGANIZATION

Editors Note:

Well, if this video (like so many others that I have on my blog) doesn’t wake up the dead from their fairy tail belief that the FDA is some sort of government agency that is looking after the public’s best interest then NOTHING will awake them from the dead.

With corporations directly paying not just FDA officials but, part of the organization itself, coupled with the fact that local, state and federal governments ALL have financial ties to ALL the corporations that the FDA is ‘SUPPOSED’ to be monitoring to call the FDA ANYTHING BUT PRIVATELY run is pure fiction.

One other note to you people who cling to these puppet presidents…

Both Obama and, Bush before him, have done everything in the seat’s power to aid and abet both criminals in government and corporations by passing bogus laws making whistle-blowing a damn near ‘illegal’ act.

Advertisements

July 21, 2010

Why Big Pharma Keeps Lying And The FDA Keeps Green Lighting Bad Drugs.

My Commentary:
The FDA is so utterly compromised that it is simply a ‘clown’s costume’ that major pharmaceutical and chemical corporations put on to ‘PLAY’ GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT. Guess what? The Joke is on those who rely on the FDA as a ‘CREDIBLE’ government agency. The FDA is to protect special interest and, let’s get this straight, YOU AND YOUR WELL BEING ARE OF NO ‘SPECIAL INTEREST’ TO THE FDA. This is an organization that will engage in CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES SUCH AS KIDNAPPING IN A FOREGN COUNTRY to stop an individual from selling herbal products that actually heal people to green lighting drugs and vaccines that are WITHOUT QUESTION going to harm people.

So, why does big pharma keep lying and the FDA keep green lighting when it comes to bad drugs AND VACCINES? It’s simple. It’s because the so called medical professionals have no spine (not all, but MOST) and, the general public gets more upset when a basketball players leaves a town then to say “enough is enough” when a drug or vaccine harms a loved one.

Keep in mind even though the article below is mainly about the diabetic drug Avandia, the clown costume known as the FDA was wore by Merck when their partner in crime green lighted Merck to leave a genetically modified lab ‘PIG VIRUS‘ in their RotaTeq vaccine. Yeah, they love you to death, and you’ve probably got the clown image correct in your head by now. Evil clown.

Avandia fraud explained: Why Big Pharma keeps lying about its drugs (opinion)

(NaturalNews For All Sourced Links)
Sometimes the degree of fraud that takes place in the drug industry is so mind-boggling that it’s hard to determine whether drug regulators and the media are paying attention at all. For the past several months, drug giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has been under scrutiny for tampering with clinical trial data for its diabetes drug, Avandia. Reports show that the company lied about Avandia’s safety in order to get the drug approved and keep it on the market. But despite numerous pieces of credible evidence and witness testimonies that have all come forward — all of which reveal GSK’s deception — an FDA advisory panel is still recommending that Avandia remain on the market.

Back in February, a Senate Finance Committee report revealed that not only is Avandia dangerous, but GSK knows this and has deliberately tried to hide this crucial information from the public. The report even goes so far as to openly name the FDA as a culprit in conspiring with GSK (and other drug companies) to deceive the public. (You can read the article I wrote about this report at: http://www.naturalnews.com/028233_G…)

Right after this extensive report was released, an FDA advisory panel voted 22 – 1 in favor of keeping the drug on the market. And just a few days ago, another FDA panel did the same thing following official hearings that showed even further that GSK committed fraud in getting Avandia approved. (It has since been revealed that at least one expert on the FDA panel voting for Avandia’s approval was on the take, receiving “speaking fees” from GSK. But no one seems to care about this disturbing fact…)

You can read the details of the report at the following link:
http://finance.senate.gov/newsroom/…

The lies and manipulation of GlaxoSmithKline

Pharmaceutical companies are notorious for skewing the truth in order to get their next blockbuster drug approved for sale. These companies are vicious, money-hungry, multi-national corporate monsters that will stop at nothing to make an obscene profit, even if it means exposing their customers to harm.

It’s one thing for a company that sells, say, televisions, to lie about the quality of its product. Nobody ultimately dies from false claims about a poor quality TV and, if found guilty, the company that produced the TV will likely be held liable for any crimes it committed through deceptive marketing. But when it comes to drug companies that peddle dangerous toxins as medicine, it’s a whole different story.

Sadly, Big Pharma is one of the most protected industries on the planet. Big Pharma gets away with murder (literally), and nobody really seems to care. You and I would be hauled off to jail immediately for doing even a small fraction of what Big Pharma does, but when Big Pharma does it, the blinders go up because observers falsely believe that drugs are “science-based”, and that the wonderful drug companies would never do anything to harm us.

Such thinking is pure foolishness, of course, especially when you examine the plain facts in the GSK case.

Hiding the truth

First of all, internal documents reveal that GSK knew about the dangers of Avandia since the early days of its development, but didn’t disclose any of this information to the public or to the FDA. And why would they? The FDA, according to the same reports, has been in collusion with GSK since the beginning to hide the truth, so GSK has had no reason to disclose anything.

Think about it. GSK created a diabetes drug that, at its high point, was raking in more than $3 billion a year in profits. GSK spent millions of dollars for research and development of the drug, paid for the clinical trials, and purchased approval from the FDA for the several million dollars it costs to complete the FDA drug application. And GSK did all this knowing full well that the drug causes a substantial increase in the risk of heart attacks and death.

With all of this in mind, do you really think that the company is now going to simply own up to the fact that it lied, and willingly agree to have the drug pulled from the market?

Truth be told, drug companies like GSK practically never tell the truth. They don’t have to. Even when their racket gets exposed, it all gets glossed over and covered up by the bureaucrats in our government agencies.

GSK’s flawed safety studies

It’s amazing to me just how many people put their trust in the “safety studies” the drug companies conduct on their own drugs. That such studies are considered credible by anyone just goes to show you that critical thinking skills are severely lacking among both the public and members of the medical profession.

Drug companies spend millions of dollars on studies and clinical trials that are designed to show that their drug is safe, and with enough manipulation, they usually get the results they’re looking for. These studies have little or nothing to do with actual science or unbiased inquiry; it’s all about using “pretend science” to produce a result that will allow them to achieve FDA approval.

And this scenario is no different in GSK’s trials for Avandia which, according to reports, didn’t properly reflect the inherent dangers of the drug.

When challenged about her concerns over the quality of GSK’s safety data for Avandia, Dr. Nancy Geller, a member of the FDA advisory committee and director of the Office of Biostatistics Research at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, responded by explaining that clinical trial data is “not [reliable] if you report the wrong follow-up date and not if you withdraw someone from a trial just before their death.”

In other words, drug companies change all sorts of things during a trial in order to achieve a desired result (which makes them anything but trustworthy). This includes removing people from the clinical trial right before they die in order to avoid having a death statistic show up in the final data. Oh look, is Mary about to expire? Hurry, kick her out of the testing group before she ruins the safety record of our drug!

These are the types of things GSK was doing to hide the truth about Avandia. To call these clinical trials “scientific” is an affront to the entire science community. And yet, somehow, the scientists continue to go along with all this…

According to a leaked internal GSK email, study results from a 1999 trial of Avandia that found the drug to be dangerous were intentionally kept “under the radar”. Dr. Martine Freed, a GSK company executive, explained in that same email that none of the data from that particular study should “see the light of day to anyone outside of GSK.”

Bloomberg’s BusinessWeek has the full report on the FDA Panel’s evaluation prior to its Wednesday vote: http://www.businessweek.com/lifesty…

FDA orders GSK to do another trial

The funny thing about all this is that, in light of the concerns over GSK’s trial tampering, the FDA actually ordered the company to conduct another trial to reevaluate Avandia’s safety. How this was expected to accomplish anything productive is anyone’s guess, considering that GSK lied about the previous trials. What makes the FDA think that a new trial is going to be beneficial? (But remember, insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results, and the FDA isn’t anything if not insane…)

But that’s the way the game is played between the FDA and Big Pharma. It’s a never-ending circus of so-called investigations and busywork designed to fabricate the results they’re looking for. Nobody asks the tough questions, and nobody ever states the obvious which, in this case, is that GSK committed fraud and must be held criminally responsible. The two entities work hand-in-hand to fulfill an agenda that’s based on greed and nothing more. Science is abandoned from the start.

FDA panel refuses to support pulling Avandia from the market, let alone prosecute GSK

So after witness testimonies (one of which you can read about here: http://www.businessweek.com/news/20… ) and a pile of credible evidence presented as part of the mounting case against GSK, an FDA advisory panel voted last Wednesday to recommend that Avandia remain on the market, according to a Wall Street Journal report. Twenty of the 33 members ultimately voted against pulling Avandia from the market, and the FDA is expected to make its final decision about the drug soon, based on this recommendation.

You can read the full Wall Street Journal article here: http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO…

Members of the panel who voted against pulling Avandia from the market explained to reporters that they believe there isn’t strong enough clinical data to show that Avandia is dangerous. But how much more evidence do these panel members need to conclude that there’s a problem?

If evidence of falsified study data and reports showing that Avandia is dangerous isn’t enough, it’s difficult to say whether any amount of evidence would ever be enough for these people. According to the BusinessWeek article, the FDA itself even posted official remarks on its website stating that GSK mishandled its earlier Avandia trials, but apparently even that isn’t enough for some of the FDA advisory panel members to put two and two together.

It seems that even if GSK came right out tomorrow and admitted that Avandia is dangerous (which the company’s leaked internal emails basically reveal on their own), some members of the FDA advisory panel would argue with the company itself, saying that there’s not enough evidence and that the drug should stay on the market.

And what about the potentially 100,000 heart attacks and deaths that may be linked to Avandia? Aw, just sweep that under the rug. Pretend it doesn’t exist. Dead people don’t talk, and they don’t sue corporations either, so that’s nothing to be concerned about.

All diabetes drugs are dangerous, Avandia is just more dangerous

Oddly enough, the primary issue with Avandia in this case isn’t just that it causes heart attacks or that the company lied about its research, but rather that Avandia trials show the drug appears to be more dangerous than competitor’s drugs like Actos. In fact, the main focus at the hearing was whether or not GSK had falsified study data to make it look as if Avandia isn’t any worse than Actos.

In reality, both Actos and Avandia can cause heart failure. They both come from the thiazolidinediones family of diabetes drugs, and they’re both potentially dangerous. In fact, both drugs bear the FDA’s “black box” warning label, which is the agency’s most extreme warning label.

So you’ve really got these two drug companies arguing over which of their drugs kills fewer people. And achieving that requires distorting a lot of clinical trials, burying other trials, spreading the money around to FDA panel experts and other similar criminal activities which now seem to typify Big Pharma.

What’s now obvious to us all is that GSK lied about the safety of Avandia, and it has harmed untold numbers of people as a result. According to a statistical analysis in the Senate Finance Committee report, more than 83,000 heart attacks have been caused by Avandia. Several hundred people reportedly die every month because of Avandia.

So removing Avandia from the market is only a very small part of the equation. True justice will be served when GSK is held criminally responsible for lying to the FDA and deceiving the public. GSK’s greed is harming and killing thousands of people every single year, and regulators are bickering over whether or not Avandia is a little more dangerous than Actos. Something is seriously wrong with this picture.

I’ve mentioned this before in previous articles, but there actually is a cure for diabetes, and it doesn’t involve either Avandia or Actos. You won’t hear about it from the mainstream media or the medical industrial complex, but we’ve got some great resources here on NaturalNews that talk all about it, and you can find those at: http://naturalnews.com/diabetes.html

The truth is no person needs to take Avandia or Actos. Both drugs are needless, irrelevant and entirely outmoded. Simple foods and nutrition can cure diabetes, especially when tied to small doses of regular physical exercise. Rather than pushing dangerous, deadly drugs onto patients, our nation’s doctors should be well versed in nutrition and exercise physiology. They should be recommending radical changes in the diets of diabetic patients to get them off all refined, dead foods and onto fresh, living foods and superfoods.

This is the true answer to our nation’s diabetes pandemic. But of course teaching patients how to take care of their own health never made a dime for Big Pharma. And sending a patient home with the knowledge they need to stay well and avoid hospitals and doctor visits never made any money for the doctors.

America’s health system isn’t designed to keep you well, or cure your disease, or even prevent disease. It’s designed to sucker you into a system of pharmaceutical dependency that’s fronted by drug-pushing physicians who for the most part believe that patients have virtually no role in their own health or disease — and only doctors know what they’re talking about.

That might carry some weight if the doctors themselves weren’t dying of cancer, heart attacks and strokes — all at a rate much higher than the general public. There are a lot of sick, dying conventional MDs out there. They’re all on pharmaceuticals. They all believe in the “science” of Big Pharma. And they’re all paying for that foolish gullibility with their lives.

Don’t you make the same mistake.

And just for the record, there are also some really good MDs who don’t buy into Big Pharma’s lies and who actually follow a more holistic, natural lifestyle. If you can find one of those, stick with them!

May 21, 2010

Pig virus contaminates rotavirus vaccines, but FDA says no problem

My Commentary:
What is interesting to me about the NON surprise ruling by the bought and paid for FDA is that the initial contamination was supposed to be limited just to the Rotarix vaccine. If the FDA is including both GlaxoSmithKline and Merck vaccine manufactures, this is where your ‘story’ lay. That is a huge detail AND a big deal! The question should be asked, why was it reported initially that Rotarix was the SOLE vaccine contaminated with this pig virus? Now the obvious question is, how can this be an accident when BOTH the Rotarix manufacture and the Merck’s Rotateq vaccine have the SAME contaminated vaccines? Also, why does this pig virus wind up in a ‘Rotavirus vaccine’ by two completely different companies as opposed to being in completely different types of vaccines? Last, these DNA strands ARE NOT THE ONLY VIRAL CONTAMINATES IN THESE VACCINES. Barbara Loe Fisher did an excellent ‘in depth’ report on this issue, and really should be read by all.
————————————————————

(NaturalNews) Rotavirus vaccines are commonly given to children, and this year’s batch of vaccines made by GlaxoSmithKline and Merck are contaminated with a pig virus, the FDA recently discovered. So the FDA called a meeting to determine whether injecting a pig virus into the bodies of young children might be some sort of problem requiring a recall of the vaccines.

Can you guess what conclusion the agency reached? As reported by Reuters, the FDA concluded “…it was safe for doctors to resume giving patients Glaxo’s Rotarix and continue using Merck’s Rotateq. The agency said there was no evidence the contamination caused any harm…”

In other words, as long as they can bury the evidence and deny any link between vaccines and health problems — which has been the standard excuse of the FDA for decades — they can continue to claim the vaccines are safe enough to inject into little children.

Never mind the fact that the pig virus found in the vaccines actually causes a wasting disease in baby pigs, giving them intense diarrhea and causing them to rapidly lose weight. DNA from these viruses was detected in the “master cells” used to make the vaccines.

Suppressing the evidence of harm

An FDA advisory panel said the risk to human health from the viral contamination was only “theoretical.” But of course it’s easy to claim anything is “theoretical” if you suppress the evidence that it’s real. By simply ignoring any reports of neurological side effects from the vaccine, the FDA can always claim there is “no evidence” of harm. Well, no evidence they’re willing to accept as real, anyway.

And that’s how vaccine science works these days: Suppress any evidence of harm, deny any links between vaccines and neurological problems, then okay practically any viral contamination from any animal and declare it’s all safe to be injected directly into the bodies of infants and children.

So much for science, huh? The vaccine industry operates more like a cult than a scientific organization, and anyone who questions the beliefs of their cult is immediately branded a heretic and publicly condemned.

By the way, even though these rotavirus vaccines are contaminated with a pig virus, the companies that make them claim there is “no manufacturing or safety issue” with the vaccines. In other words, this is normal!

Think about that for a moment: The discovery that a vaccine being injected into children is contaminated with a virus from a pig doesn’t even result in a product recall! It doesn’t raise any red flags! It’s just business as usual in the vaccine industry, where DNA from any number of diseased animals is often used in the vaccine formulas.

Last year, rotavirus vaccines earned nearly a billion dollars in revenues for Big Pharma. The risk of a child in the United States actually dying from a rotavirus infection is ridiculously small. What these kids need is good nutrition and vitamin D, not an injection of a questionable vaccine made with pig virus DNA.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS...

February 18, 2010

FDA: Conflict of Interest in Vaccine Approval Confirmed

Filed under: HOME — nwqfk @ 3:15 p02
Tags: , , ,

My Commentary:
The headline is like a broken record. There really is NO conflict of interest at the FDA because the INTERESTS ‘ALL lies’ with the big pharmacological industrial machine which has NO ‘interest’ regarding the public and it’s safety.

Right now, Investigations are going on in Europe over the very same issue concerning the World Health Organization Mr. Rockefeller founded over the swine flu hoax.

WEHONEWS.com
Monday, February 15, 2010 – By Michael Mooney, West Hollywood
West Hollywood, California (February 15, 2010) – If you’ve read my two articles in WeHoNews.com questioning the safety and effectiveness of the swine flu vaccine, you know how I feel about it.

Michael Mooney writes on health issues, focusing on research and access. WeHo News.
I’d rather take high dose vitamin D to strengthen my immune system so I don’t have to worry about getting the flu than get vaccinated with a potentially toxic vaccine that was rushed into circulation even after World Health Organization balked at the lack of confirmed safety data, saying, “…with such a large amount of an experimental vaccine that contains mercury being distributed, keeping track of people that experience adverse effects will be difficult.”

What’s important to note is that FDA is once more not doing their job of protecting the public to the standards of modern science. They have seriously compromised their own approval process with dangerous medications. Think Vioxx.

Not only did they dumb down on what possible problems the swine flu vaccine could cause, but they went further by advocated for vaccine manufacturers and promoting the sales of the swine flu vaccine while ignoring safety concerns about solidly documented problems that other countries do not ignore.

For FDA to sell vaccines goes farther than what their official role is defined as, to protect the public from danger.

Story Continued…

December 22, 2009

FDA accused of international kidnapping. That’s How They Roll.

My Commentary
Even though this is a vaccine blog I feel it justified to post this FDA ‘event’, since this same FDA is responsible for the ‘pushing’ (or rubber stamping) of dangerous drugs AND vaccines onto an un-witted public.

It shouldn’t come as any surprise to those of us aware of the ‘CRIMINAL’ behavior of the FDA, that they would be unconstitutionally acting as ‘their own’ police department. What may surprise even the population with a clue is that the FDA is acting as CIA agents going abroad and kidnapping people.

The FDA is a cleaver COVER acronym for the pharmacological Rockefeller et.al monopoly to not only highjack the United States food and drug regulatory system but, to act as it’s own judicial system as well. If you ever had a doubt about this FACT read this ‘event’.

There can be NO DOUBT that the FDA was initially created for the Pharmacological Industrial Complex to take over and control when starring directly at the FACTS of the gross conflict of interest that resides within it. There can also be no doubt that the reason for the creation and control of such an agency is to STAMP OUT ALL NATURAL HEALING that COMPETES with big pharma’s drug monopoly. Of course it did NOT start out this way. The level of control, AS ALWAYS, happens INCREMENTALLY. This agency is so out of control today, had you told the public when it was created that the FDA would OUTLAW lime growers to ‘claim’ limes prevent a ‘disease’ called scurvy, most would have said that would be going “way too far” and could NEVER happen. Never say Never! Even though limes ‘preventing a disease’ is NOT A ‘CLAIM’ but a well known ‘FACT’, the FDA intentionally and purposefully distorts FACTS as claims to persecute anyone HEALING without AUTHORIZATION from this criminal organization.

So if anyone should be hauled in front of a FAIR and JUST court it would most certainly have to be the FDA itself for crimes BEYOND the ‘claims’ that this agency is working FOR THE BENEFIT of the general welfare of the U.S. population. Where such FALSE claims have in fact endangered the general welfare of the population.

www.PamRotella.com

FDA accused of international kidnapping, illegal detention of prominent Ecuadorian herbalist

21 December 2009
Pam Rotella

Allegations of kidnapping and illegal detention by the US Food and Drug Administration are being made after its seizure of a prominent herbalist from Ecuador.

Greg Caton, owner of Alpha Omega Labs, was seized from Ecuador in a move outside of extradition procedures, and against the orders of an Ecuadorian Federal judge. The alleged kidnapping occurred three days prior to a pending hearing for Caton, having the appearance of an attempt to evade compliance with the court’s expected ruling.

Christopher Kelly of the FDA refused comment on the FDA’s current actions in Ecuador, or its legal argument for subverting extradition procedures within Ecuador and removing Caton via police seizure. Kelly referred inquiries to the US Marshals and US Attorneys offices.

When contacted, a US Marshals spokesman denied involvement in the seizure of Caton from Ecuador, and said that the Marshals’ role in this case would be their usual duty of holding Federal prisoners, probably after Caton reached Florida. The US Attorneys office was also contacted for comment but has not responded.

Speaking via phone from Ecuador on Saturday, Caton’s wife Cathryn said that the FDA finally explained its reason for her husband’s abduction during Florida court proceedings. The FDA claimed that Greg Caton violated his supervised probation under a 2003 plea of selling “unapproved drugs.”

“Selling unapproved drugs” is a charge usually filed against herbalists who sell herbs and also make claims about the herbs’ medicinal properties. The FDA does not allow medicinal claims about food or herbal products by those who also sell them. No actual “drugs,” in the traditional sense of the term, were involved in the 2003 Caton case.

Cathryn Caton said that Caton’s company Alpha Omega Labs (AltCancer.com) had been selling herbal products after Caton’s release in the US, but that the herbs were sold from Ecuador where herb sales are legal along with information on their medicinal properties. In fact, Caton had moved his company to Ecuador specifically because he could continue working with herbal remedies without restrictions on the information provided to customers.

At issue is whether Caton’s herb sales in Ecuador would violate Caton’s probation in the United States. This legal issue could not be addressed in Ecuador, as Caton was seized before his court date there. It is possible that Caton’s abduction was meant to preempt such legal precedent from being set on this matter.

After arriving in Florida, Greg Caton was given a detention hearing and arraigned for violating his supervised release. A hearing is scheduled for December 28th to move him to Louisiana. According to his wife, Caton will probably be held in Florida until early next year, and then moved to Louisiana for hearings on probation violation charges. So far, Caton has been represented by a court-appointed attorney.

The method used to remove Caton from the country — kidnapping — is probably the most egregious charge leveled against the FDA. Before his scheduled court date, Ecuadorian police illegally removed Greg Caton from his cell in Ecuador without court authorization, and put him on an American Airlines jet. One of Cathryn Caton’s contacts at the airport recognized a US State Department employee, and happened to know the man’s identity due to his presence at Greg Caton’s hearings in Ecuador. Caton’s contact informed her that the State Department employee was directing the Ecuadorian police on how to slip Greg Caton out of Ecuador.

The Ecuadorian Federal Judge in charge of Caton’s appeal was contacted and went to the airport in person, where he informed American Airlines that they were engaged in an illegal action, and presented paperwork ordering the release of Greg Caton. American Airlines refused to allow Caton off of the plane, and claimed that they were not subject to Ecuadorian laws even while in Ecuador, that they were technically US soil (a privilege enjoyed by embassies). The jet was then allowed to leave the airport, and Caton was transported to Miami, Florida. The Ecuadorian police officers flew out of the country on the airplane with Caton according to witnesses, but the US State Department employee who directed the action stayed in Ecuador. Cathryn Caton wants to know who paid for their airline tickets.

Along with questions of why the FDA felt entitled to subvert the Ecuadorian legal system to capture a mere herbalist, tactics by the agency prior to Caton’s court appeal are also being scrutinized. The Catons claim that one FDA agent in particular, John Armand, seemed to be “rogue,” and engaged in questionable tactics such as using a witness accused of embezzling $20,000 from Caton’s company as a witness against Caton. Cathryn Caton suspected that the employee was led to believe that landing her bosses in jail would help her to avoid jail time herself. Caton witnessed the woman with the FDA agent in court, making claims that helped to build the agent’s case.

The FDA also refused to comment on whether Armand or other agents in charge of Caton’s case had past affiliations with pharmaceutical companies or competitors of Caton’s products. One well-known and widely criticized fault of the Food and Drug Administration is the “revolving door” between pharmaceutical companies and the agency charged with regulating them, the FDA. Employees of the FDA often are hired from drug companies, or are offered high-paid jobs at the very pharmaceutical companies whose drugs they helped to approve. This cozy relationship is seen as a major flaw in the way drugs are approved and regulated in the United States.

In addition to the FDA’s star witness being an accused embezzler, Caton was also told that the judge who signed her husband’s original deportation order had been bribed with promises of green cards for his relatives in the United States. (Caton will not identify the witness or the name/position of the US agent offering green cards, for the protection of her witness.)

The appeal of that judge’s deportation order was scheduled to be heard by a Federal Ecuadorian judge with no such questions surrounding his integrity. However, that higher judge’s orders at the airport in Guayaquil were ignored and Greg Caton was flown out of the country. Cathryn Caton is working with the political process in Ecuador to have the people responsible for her husband’s abduction investigated and prosecuted. President Correa of Ecuador had already expelled 2 diplomats after the FDA attempted a similar abduction of Greg Caton in 2008.

Caton’s company, Alpha Omega Labs (AltCancer.com), is the maker of anti-cancer herbal blends such as “Black Salve” (a bloodroot-based topical product) and “Cansema” (a chaparral-based capsule blend). Notably, a new cancer drug named “Chemex” based on chaparral was mentioned on Caton’s own web site:

“Chaparral (Larrea tridentata, Larrea mexicata) — An herb long reverred for its miraculous medicinal properties by Indians of the Southwest U.S., chaparral’s secret is known to be contained in a substance known as NDGA (nordihydroguauretic acid). This organic anti-oxidant is the basis of several recent cancer cures which have been filed with the U.S. patent office, most by Chemex Pharmaceutical of Fort Collins, Colorado (USA). The FDA has granted drug status to Chemex for a remedy for a pre-cancerous skin remedy (actinic keratosis) which uses NDGA as its base. Our products contain specially harvested chaparral which have been specimened and known to contain 16-18% NDGA by weight for maximum concentration.”

Bloodroot-based topical solutions are traditionally used to treat skin cancer patients. In his book “Spontaneous Healing,” Andrew Weil, MD, mentioned using bloodroot paste on his dog. Weil was satisfied with the results.

Article

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.