From Hell To Veins

July 22, 2012

Vaccinated Children 500% More Diseased Then Unvaccinated Children. DUH!

This ought to set the apologists for the snake oil salesmen (Skeptics) into a damage control frenzy.   Big Pharma uses THEIR FDA, CDC, NHI and WHO stop ANY research of this nature.

The ‘established’  medical industrial complex really did not go after Dr. Wakefield UNTIL he ‘publicly’ stated that he wanted to do studies comparing vaccinated children to unvaccinated children.  Right after that statement was made they went after Wakefield but, he is NOT the only professional the establishment has gone after for doing or even suggesting doing these very clinical studies / field research.

My family has participated in such research.


Vaccinated children have up to 500% more disease than unvaccinated children

(NaturalNews) Suspicions have been confirmed for those wary of vaccinating their children. A recent large study corroborates other independent study surveys comparing unvaccinated children to vaccinated children.

They all show that vaccinated children have two to five times more childhood diseases, illnesses, and allergies than unvaccinated children.

Originally, the recent still ongoing study compared unvaccinated children against a German national health survey conducted by KiGGS involving over 17,000 children up to age 19. This currently ongoing survey study was initiated by classical homoeopathist Andreas Bachmair.

However, the American connection for Bachmair’s study can be found at website that has added a link for parents of vaccinated children to participate in the study. So far this ongoing survey has well over 11,000 respondents, mostly from the U.S.A. Other studies have surveyed smaller groups of families.

Nevertheless, the results were similar. Of course, none of these studies were picked up by the MSM (mainstream media). None were funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) or the World Health Organization (WHO) or any national or international health agency or medical profession group (

They don’t dare compare the health of unvaccinated children to vaccinated children objectively and risk disrupting their vaxmania (vaccination mania). The focus for all the studies was mostly on childhood illnesses occurring as the children matured.

Dramatic, debilitating, or lethal vaccine injuries were not the focus since so few, five percent or less, actually get reported to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Injury Reporting System) in the U.S.A. for various reasons including:

* It’s a complicated system that takes time from a doctor’s practice.
* Most parents don’t know about it.
* Only adverse reactions that occur immediately after vaccinations are considered.
* Since VAERS is voluntary, most doctors don’t want to incriminate themselves with vaccination injuries and maintain their denial of vaccine dangers.

Consequently, even the most terrible adverse reactions are minimally acknowledged, while long term negative health issues resulting from vaccines are not even considered relevant.

Different surveys summarized

The childhood diseases usually posed to respondents by the independent surveys involved asthma, reoccurring tonsillitis, chronic bronchitis, sinusitis, allergies, eczema, ear infections, diabetes, sleep disorders, bedwetting, dyslexia, migraines, hyperactivity, ADD, epilepsy, depression, and slower development of speech or motor skills.

In 1992, a New Zealand group called the Immunization Awareness Society (IAS) surveyed 245 families with a total of 495 children. The children were divided with 226 vaccinated and 269 unvaccinated. Eighty-one families had both vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

The differences were dramatic, with unvaccinated children showing far less incidence of common childhood ailments than vaccinated children (

From a different survey in the South Island New Zealand city of Christchurch, among children born during or after 1977, none of the unvaccinated children had asthma events where nearly 25% of the vaccinated children were treated for asthma by age 10 (

Many of the comments from non-vaccinating parents to for the ongoing Bachmair survey mentioned vaccination danger and developing true immunity naturally were concerns (

A PhD immunologist who wrote the book Vaccine Illusion, Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych, has gone against the dogma of her medical training and background. She asserts that true immunity to any disease is not conferred by vaccines. Exposure to the disease, whether contracted or not, does (

Perhaps the most informal grass-roots survey going on now is by Tim O’Shea, DC, author of Vaccination is Not Immunization. He simply has non-vaccinating parents email him with comparisons of their children’s health to friends and families they know with vaccinated children. That and more is available on his site (

Sources for this article include:

Link to participate in Bachmair survey here:

May be of interest for the undecided:

Learn more:

November 7, 2011

Dr. Wakefield Addresses Physicians & Surgeons

The information Dr. Wakefield gives these medical professionals can be VERIFIED as 100% accurate. This is the very reason Dr. Wakefield has been blacked out by the corporate media who are HEAVILY invested in the pharmacological industrial complex.



May 15, 2011

Dr. Wakefield Threatened Vaccine Gold Mine.

Editor’s Note:
A ‘world renowned’ neural scientist and brain surgeon Dr. Blaylock weighs in on the Dr. Wakefield issue.

I just want to say when ANYONE ‘without an agenda’ (which does NOT include the pro OR anti vaccines camps) looks at both sides of the Wakefield argument they quickly find IN REALITY, that the ‘research’ was NEVER the issue (fraud). The same research has been uncovered by the truckloads and brought into the light for all who care to look. What the public finds is that before the witch hunt, Dr. Wakefields credentials were heavy indeed, and what he said carried a lot of weight behind it. THAT WAS WHEN HE ‘PLAYED BALL’. Dr. Wakefield’s TRUE CRIME by his accuser’s account wasn’t for medical fraud. Brian Deer’s work has been thoroughly debunked. Dr. Wakefield’s true crime by his accusers was, that one of there own ‘pro vaccine’ heavy weights found his ‘conscience’ and, DARED to say that vaccines need much better and TRANSPARENT research.

Protectors of the two century old vaccine gold mine knows exactly what ‘REAL DISCOVERY’ would mean to the ‘mining operation’. The end.

Blaylock: Big Pharma Vilified Researcher for Threatening Vaccine Program

Thursday, January 13, 2011 10:52 AM
By Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.
I find it ironic that the media, the British government, and leaders in medical academia jumped on board attacking and destroying Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s reputation based on “fraud” charges related to a study he conducted about the link between the measles vaccine and autism.

It is ironic for a number of reasons. How can the British government, itself drowning in deception at every level, dare accuse anyone of fraud?

The panel assembled by the government and academia to judge Wakefield, ironically, dares to speak of fraud, yet their main complaint is that his findings “might endanger the ‘sacrosanct’ vaccine program,” not that his principal findings were wrong. In fact, several independent researchers found the same measles vaccine-related colitis that he described.

A recently released charge by the BMJ editors is that Wakefield was poised to get huge profits from a product stemming from his research results. I am not here to defend Wakefield, rather, I demonstrate the double standard regularly practiced by his vocal critics.

Virtually every paper published on drugs, such as statins, is authored by individuals having financial links to as many as three to four pharmaceutical companies each. The same is true of papers published by major journals extolling vaccine efficacy and safety. They know these papers violate every ethical principle known, yet they are published in some of the most prestigious journals.

Abundant evidence has shown that these very same people destroy the reputations of anyone producing evidence, no matter how well researched and of the highest ethical standards, if it in any way endangers this vaccine program. It is ironic that these accusers speak of “blatant fraud,” when virtually all of the vaccine safety evidence they use abundantly is fraudulent by careful design.

Scare Tactics
Ironically, even their outcry of the effect of Wakefield’s paper is deceitful. They scream that it caused vaccine rates to fall below the 80 percent level needed for “herd immunity,” when they know that no one has ever proven his paper was the cause.

A growing number of British have suffered from vaccine complications, and they are rightly concerned about vaccine safety. When there was a small outbreak of measles in this country, as few as 300 cases, they screamed it was an epidemic and millions were at risk of dying. In fact, in similar outbreaks studies found that 90 percent of the affected children had been fully or partially vaccinated, and most had mild infections.

When I grew up there was no measles vaccine and everyone in my class got the measles and no one died or suffered serious harm. To imply our society is at risk of millions of deaths should vaccine rates drop is a blatant lie used to scare parents into over-vaccinating their children. They use the same scare tactics based on manipulated data to terrify the elderly into getting a flu shot every year.

Even this year, after we witnessed a 20-fold increase in miscarriages and stillbirths among women vaccinated with the H1N1 vaccine last year, public heath officials are strongly suggesting that pregnant women be vaccinated with both the H1N1 and seasonal flu vaccines. Dr. Garry Goldman, who has done a comprehensive analysis of this event, calls the government’s actions “an act of willful misconduct.”

Manipulating ‘Safety’ Studies
Anyone analyzing the “vaccine safety studies” done by vaccine makers and vaccine proponents can see that they were purposely designed to show safety by omitting people in the study who truly reflected the population being vaccinated and who were, by all standards of science, at risk of harm by the vaccines.

They do studies that use as placebo controls people injected with a vaccine adjuvant. Placebos are supposed to be completely inert. The evidence shows that the greatest danger from vaccines is from the vaccine adjuvant — so, how can they use adjuvant-injected people as controls? Yet, all of their studies used such vaccinated controls — this is blatantly manipulated, and they know it.

The studies that are quoted endlessly by these elite members of academia and government agencies and used to close the door on the vaccine connection to neurodevelopmental problems are purposefully designed so as to suggest no link between vaccines and any complication.

This falsified research is protected by academia, the media, and government agencies. Yet, they have the audacity to stand in judgment of Wakefield. This is not to say that Wakefield should be free of scrutiny — all researchers should be carefully scrutinized for bias.
Yet, why is there no open disclosure as to the connections between the rabid media, the investigating panel, the Lancet and BMJ journal editors, reporter Brian Deer, the British government, and the manufacturers of vaccines? When one examines these articles professing to prove the lack of a connection between vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders, it is shocking to see that virtually all of the authors have extensive financial connections to the pharmaceutical vaccine makers.

These same companies advertise heavily on all of the major media outlets and the media understands very well that reports endangering vaccine sales can mean a huge loss of advertising revenue. This constitutes deception on a grand scale — and it is practiced every day in this country and the UK.

So, why is Wakefield being attacked and his reputation ruined — especially for an article written 13 years ago? For several reasons, all of which involved the makers of vaccines. Vaccines generate tens of billions of dollars in revenue for pharmaceutical manufacturers every year.

The H1N1 vaccine alone generated $1.5 billion in addition to the $1 billion generated by the seasonal flu vaccine, neither of which has been shown to be either effective or safe. You have been told this safety and efficacy has been scientifically shown, when this is a shocking, provable lie.

Silencing the Dissenters
By careful manipulation of the media, the pharmaceutical companies have created the illusion that the entire link between vaccines and neurodevelopmental brain damage is hinged solely on Wakefield’s article, implying there is no other evidence suggesting a powerful link.
Nothing could be further from the truth. I have written seven peer-reviewed articles and co-authored a recent ebook that makes a powerful scientific case for such a link. A growing number of researchers have also supplied hard data from very carefully done research that strongly suggest a link.

The defenders of vaccine policy used in the United States and the UK have used poorly done, obviously manipulated studies to make their case. If we use the same judgmental standards they used against Wakefield, they would be seen to be guilty of gross misconduct and, most importantly, of endangering the public at large.

Now, by destroying Wakefield’s reputation and accusing him of “crimes against humanity,” they hope to silence any further research in this area. It has the ring of old Soviet-style intimidation and the fear tactics the KGB used against dissidents.

The Case Against Vaccines
The truth is that the Wakefield article’s main theme was that they found bowel inflammation (colitis) in a small number of children vaccinated with the live measles vaccine and that the inflammation was caused by the measles virus from the vaccine itself.

He only proposed, almost in passing, that there might be a link between such bowel inflammation and autism, which is perfectly reasonable, ethical, and supported by other neuroscience research. I can cite hundreds of reputable articles in the medical literature that make similar proposals about less-controversial issues and are never questioned because they do not endanger pharmaceutical company profits.

The truth is that the case against the present vaccine schedule is very powerful and built on the findings of some of the most prestigious researchers in the world. The problem is the media and academia are so controlled by the pharmaceutical giants that the general public has no idea that this research even exists.

It is now known in the research world that questioning vaccine safety is a career killer. Researchers who dare to do so have been fired, denied research grants, their articles are rejected by the more “prestigious” science journals, and they are no longer invited to speak at national meetings. The atmosphere of fear is pervasive — all generated by the pharmaceutical giants and their minions.

By destroying reputations and stopping further research, pharmaceutical-controlled vaccine proponents hope to have a national law mandating all people receive every vaccine recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which is under the absolute control of the vaccine manufacturers.

The data demonstrates that millions of people are seriously injured and thousands die as a result of vaccine complications every year. In many cases the damage caused by the vaccines exceed the risk of the disease being vaccinated against — such as is the case with the chickenpox, tetanus, measles, mumps, hepatitis B, and HPV vaccines.
The United States is the most over-vaccinated country in the world and evidence is growing that we are trading an “illusion of protection” by vaccines for a massive increase in vaccine-related chronic diseases.

The entire vaccine program is based on massive fraud. The so-called H1N1 “pandemic” is a case in point. Even the World Health Organization declared there was a “huge amount” of uncertainty in the seriousness of the “pandemic,” which turned out to be far less deadly than initially feared.

The WHO admitted it mishandled the so-called pandemic and failed to convey its uncertainty to the public. Yet the CDC, the media, medical academia, and the pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturers all participated in this deception.

It is time to wake up and call for some accountability; otherwise the vaccine program will never be safe.
© 2011 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

February 3, 2011

Dr. Wakefield Video Interview On Damanding BMJ Retraction.

January 30, 2011

Dr. Wakefield Demands British Medical Journal Retract Report.

Dr. Wakefield Demands British Medical Journal Retract Story. Documents prove innocence from allegations of vaccine autism data fraud. SEE VIDEO INTERVIEW WITH DR. WAKEFIELD BELOW.

I have but one question for the pro vaccine individuals out there who come to read these findings.
Why does something like this involve NOT A DRUG BUT A VACCINE? Why is it ALWAYS vaccines that are in the center of lies and deceit by government, the corporate media and the pharmaceutical companies?

Wasn’t it the Lame Stream Corporate Media who said after they burned Dr. Wakefield to the proverbial cross of world exposure that “the vaccine / autism question was over once and for all”? Not only were THEY wrong but, these recent FACTS have opened up an even bigger can of worms for the vaccine pushers.

Bullet Points
1.) Documents Prove Dr. Wakefield’s Innocence / Freelance Journalist’s Guilt.

2.) British Medical Journal Board Member On Board Of the Drug Company That Makes The Very Vaccine in Question.

3.) Freelance Journalist Brian Deer Connected to Rupert Murdock Media Machine. Rupert Murdock Financially Connected To the Vaccine Industry. Please read.

4.) Brian Deer Falsified HIS NAME To Get Access To Grieving Mother Connected To Research Report.

5.) The British Medical Journal DID NOT CHECK BRIAN DEER’S FACTS. WHY?

7.) Dr. Wakefield’s Studies HAVE BEEN REPLICATED in over 30 + government and university studies / field research going all the way back to the 1930’s!

8.) Judge In Wakefield Kangaroo Court Major Stockholder In Company That Made Vaccine. Mouthed Off to The Media… “Vaccines SHOULD BE FORCED ON POPULATION!”

9.) Dr. Wakefield Says Children Will Suffer The Most From This Witch Hunt.

Please click HERE for the actual PDF file from Dr. Wakefield.

(NaturalNews (for ALL sourced links) New documents have emerged that clear Dr Andrew Wakefield of the allegations of fraud recently made by the British Medical Journal and its reporter Brian Deer. This new evidence “completely negates the allegations that I committed scientific
fraud. Brian Deer and Dr. Godlee of the British Medical Journal (BMJ) knew or should
have known about the facts set out below before publishing their false allegations,” says Dr Andrew Wakefield (see sources, below).

Newly-revealed documents show that on December 20th, 1996, a meeting of The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group based at the Royal Free Hospital Medical School featured a presentation by Professor Walker-Smith on seven of the children who would later become part of the group of patients Dr Wakefield wrote about in his 1998 The Lancet paper (which was later retracted by The Lancet).

Remember, Dr Wakefield has been accused of completely fabricating his findings about these same children in his 1998 paper, but these documents reveal that fourteen months before Dr Wakefield’s paper was published, two other researchers — Professor Walker-Smith and Dr Amar Dhillon — independently documented the same problems in these children, including symptoms of autism.

Thus, Dr Wakefield could not have “fabricated” these findings as alleged by the British Medical Journal, which now finds itself in the position of needing to issue a retraction, or it must now expand its accusations of fraud to include Professor Walker-Smith and Dr Dhillon… essentially, the BMJ must now insist that a “conspiracy of fraud” existed among at least these three researchers, and possibly more, in order to back up its allegation that Dr Wakefield’s study results were fabricated.

The smoking-gun evidence
Professor Walker-Smith’s 1996 presentation at the Royal Free Hospital Medical School was entitled, “Entero-colitis and Disintegrative Disorder Following MMR – A Review of the First Seven Cases.”

His presentation notes began with the following text: ““I wish today, to present some preliminary details concerning seven children, all boys, who appear to have entero-colitis and disintegrative disorder, probably autism, following MMR. I shall now briefly present
their case history [sic].”

He then went on to detail the clinical history of these seven children as derived from his medical team as well as senior pathologist Dr Amar Dhillon. Importantly, Dr Andrew Wakefield was not part of this investigation. This means that Dr Wakefield’s findings were independently replicated by another medical research team.

The British Medical Journal’s accusations against Dr Wakefield — that he fabricated his findings — are therefore false. The mainstream media accusation that Dr Wakefield’s findings have “never been replicated” is also blatantly false.

Here are the notes on the seven children, as presented in 1996, 14 months BEFORE Dr Wakefield published his landmark paper in The Lancet:

Child 1. Immediate reaction to MMR with fever at 1 [corrected, illegible]
Rapid deterioration in behaviour – autism
Histology active chronic inflammation in caecum
Treated Asacol

Child 2. MMR at 15 months – head banging 2 weeks later.
Hyperactive from 18 months.
Endoscopy – aphthoid ulcer at hepatic flexure
Caecum: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia with erythematous rim and pale swollen
Histology, Ileum mild inflammation, colon moderate inflammation
Acute and chronic inflammation.
Treated CT3211 [a dietary treatment]

Child 3. ? dysmorphism – chromosomes and normal development
MMR at 5 months [sic]
Measles at 2.5 years* – 1 month later change in behavior
Hyperactive with food
Colonoscopy – granular rectum, normal colon and lymphoid nodular
Histopathology: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia.
Increased eosinophils 5/5 mild increase in inflammatory cells (Dhillon)
Routine normal
[* correction: he received measles vaccine first at approximately 15 months of
age and MMR at 2.5. years]

Child 4 (2). Reacted to triple vaccine 4 months – screaming and near cot death
MMR at 15 months – behaviour changed after 1 week.
“measles rash” week before
Endoscopy – minor abnormalities of vascular pattern
Histology – non-specific proctocolitis**

Child 5 (3). MMR at 14 months.
Second day after, fever and rash, bangs head and behaviour abnormal
Endoscopy – Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia
Histopathology: Marked increase in IEL’s [intraepithelial lymphocytes] in ileum
with chronic inflammatory cells in reactive follicles. Increase in inflammatory cells in colon and IELs increased.

Child 6 (7). MMR – 16 months – no obvious reaction
2 years behavioral change – 2.5 years
Screaming attacks – / food related
Endoscopy – Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia terminal ileum
Histology – Prominent lymphoid follicles
Dhillon: moderate to marked increase in IEL’s, increase in chronic inflammatory
cells throughout the colon – superficial macrophages not quite granuloma
Child 78. MMR 14 months
16 months “growling voice”
18 months – behavioural changes – autism diagnosed at 3 years
Barium [follow through X ray] 5 cm tight stricture [proximal] to insertion of
terminal ileum
Endoscopy- prominent lymphoid follicle in ileum
Mild proctitis with granular mucosa
Ileum – reactive follicles
Colon – bifid forms, increased IEL’s
Slight increase in inflammatory cells

(1) Inflammation that is not diagnostic of either Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis
(2) Child 6 in The Lancet paper. The chronological order was corrected for the final Lancet paper.
(3) Child 3 in The Lancet paper

BMJ caught in its own fraud
These documents reveal that the British Medical Journal has been caught in its own fraud for willfully ignoring this evidence, which was presented to it long before its recent publication of Brian Deer’s article calling Dr Wakefield a fraud.

The BMJ willfully ignored this evidence and simply decided to destroy Dr Wakefield’s professional reputation by any means necessary. As Dr Wakefield explains:

“In allowing itself to become the vehicle for Brian Deer’s particular brand of journalism; in circumventing the process of due diligence in its enthusiasm to “kill the beast”, the BMJ has taken a huge risk. As the document presented above shows, this was a mistake. Medicine, presented with the possibility of an iatrogenic catastrophe, has boarded a dissonant bandwagon and has gone after those who have concerns – genuine concerns – that childhood vaccines may be responsible, at least in part, for the autism epidemic. The relevant science has been grossly misrepresented, crushed beneath the wheels of a Public Relations 16-wheeler that is out of control. In the meantime a relentless tsunami of damaged children claims this land.”

Brian Deer caught as a liar
It has also been revealed that journalist Brian Deer, the author of the BMJ article condemning Dr Wakefield as a fraud, is himself a liar. In attempting to gather evidence for his article in the BMJ, he lied about his identity and entered the home of one of the parents of the autism children. Specifically, he claimed he was working for The Sunday Times even though he was never a Sunday Times employee.

This is just the tip of the iceberg of the outright deception that has been used by the BMJ and Brian Deer in their attempt to silence a doctor whose only “crime” was publicly expressing concern about the safety of MMR vaccines.

That the BMJ and its writer Brian Deer have now been caught ignoring evidence and engaging in their own fraud gives credence to the idea that MMR vaccines may, indeed, not only be dangerous; but that they may be so dangerous that the top medical journals have to lie about the facts in order to protect them.

What’s clear here is that the BMJ has strayed so far from the realm of evidence-based scientific thinking that it can no longer be called a reputable medical journal at all. Its callous disregard for the truth — and its politically-motivated witch hunt against a researcher who only sought to protect the health of children — exposes it as a danger to the scientific community and the world of conventional medicine.

As this truth unfolds, these revelations will rock the medical world and expose these science journals as the frauds they truly are. Think about this: While these medical journals are taking money from vaccine manufacturers (who pay their ads), they are ignoring any scientific evidence they don’t like in order to vilify anyone who threatens the profits of these very same vaccine companies! And yet, these medical journals never admit that their very existence depends on the financial flow of money from these vaccine manufacturers who are strongly impacted by their editorial decisions!

There is fraud taking place in the vaccine industry today, of course, and the medical journals are the point men who push their distorted disinformation into the minds of doctors, journalists and anyone they can reach with their scientific distortions. At stake is the future of the vaccine industry, which is of course a multi-billion-dollar industry that thrives on misinformation and the ongoing scientific censorship of the facts surrounding the health risks posed by vaccines.

Learn more:

January 21, 2011

Was Vaccine Safety Conference The Target Of Wakefield Media Blitz?

From the National Vaccine Information Center

On January 3-7, 2011, a vaccine safety conference was held in Montego Bay, Jamaica that included a diverse groups of delegates from around the world, including senior scientists and physicians, editors of scientific journals, experts in vaccine regulation, social science and health policy, consumer child health advocates, legal experts and members of the media. 23 Public observers in the audience included Jamaican physicians, wellness practitioners, graduate and medical students in public health programs and parents.
Editor’s Note
The International vaccine safety conference was held the very week of the heaviest media blitz against Dr. Wakefield. Was this ‘world wide’ media blitz meant to send a ‘chilling effect’ to all the professionals who attended this vaccine safety conference? Was the message to the attendees.. don’t question vaccine safety OR ELSE!!

On Barbara Loe Fisher’s blog ‘Vaccine Awakening’ Barbara discusses ‘fear’. Fear, she says, is “jeopardizing the urgent need to create a supportive environment for researchers to conduct well designed studies to answer outstanding questions about vaccine safety”.

The above is an absolutely true statement but, what’s NOT mentioned is WHO is behind the ‘fear factor’ and, WHY do they use fear to shut down REAL research on vaccine safety? However, with that said, here is the mother of all questions. Why is it that vaccines get the kid glove treatment like no other ‘thing’ on this entire planet? Truth is, these are PROBLEMS to be solved and not just questions to be answered. Until these problems are ‘solved’, there WILL NEVER BE ANY REAL UNBIASED RESEARCH ON VACCINE SAFETY.

In the 19th century our ‘American’ medical profession was INDEPENDENT from the pharmaceutical industry, UNLIKE THEIR EUROPEAN COUNTER PARTS. Some of the greatest medical minds of ANY generation, such as Dr. Creighton objectively researched vaccine science and came to the conclusion that vaccines were nothing more than pseudo science on the same level as blood letting.

If ANY vaccine research is to be taken seriously today the research done back then needs to be the starting point. There are literally libraries full of this work. The scientists of that era did NOT have an agenda and was NOT intimidated by the scientific community with ties to big pharma bully tactics.

In the early 20th century the Rockefeller and Carnegie (heavy vaccine investors) fortunes were used to buy political muscle to gain control of the entire American medical system. Over time, they not only took over ALL medical schools but, created medical boards that would control ALL of the medical profession. Boards would turn medical professionals into ‘agents’ of both the state and pharmaceutical industry. So, the Rockefeller / Carnegie takeover ended the worlds ONLY independent medical professionals from the pharmaceutical industry and government regulation. Ending an era of doctors and scientists DOING UNBIASED RESEARCH on vaccines. Because, government regulation is NOTHING MORE than ‘binding’ the medical professional to the ‘protocols’ of big pharma. Today, no doctor will speak the truth on vaccines without fear of professional and ‘CORRUPT’ legal persecution. The Wakefield persecution is the clearest example of this today. The pharmaceutical industrial complex does NOT want modern day Dr. Creighton’s looking into vaccines. The pharma establishment put their foot down on that a century ago and will give no quarter to truly ‘independent’ research on vaccines.

What I wrote to Barbara Loe Fisher, who’s heart and mind is in the right place, is that pressure has to be put on both the government and pharmaceutical industry by the public to ALLOW TRULY independent research on vaccine safety to occur.

Now, here is the reality of the situation on ‘REAL’ vaccine safety research.

This question has to be asked and the answer needs to be looked squarely in the eye. Why are both the government(s) AND big pharma fighting tooth and nail AGAINST TRULY INDEPENDENT VACCINE RESEARCH? The answer is easy. Unbiased research will determine exactly what medical professionals like Dr. Creighton learned back in the 19th and early 20th century. Those ‘findings’ will bring down the entire house of cards on vaccines and the population will RIGHTLY want retribution.

Now, in the future, we must be VERY, VERY cautious on who is ‘claiming’ to be independent of both government and big pharma influence on this vaccine research issue. Big pharma has already admitted in the media that the public does not trust the vaccine scam. This means that THEY know they have to pull some ‘stunt’ to gain the public’s trust on vaccines once again.

Will the Pharmacological Industrial Complex use so-called ‘independent researcher’ to give their poison a FALSE golden seal of approval?

Stay tuned.

January 16, 2011

Wagging The Wakefield Dog. When Vaccines Get Beat Up In The Court Of Opinion.

Editor’s Note:
It seems that the American Broadcast Network’s bubbly, perky television show called ‘Good Morning America’ engaged in a bit of LYING at the expensive of ‘truth first’ and Dr. Wakefield second. You basically have a network that has 1/2 it’s advertising revenue in the form of drug ads, in a gross conflict of interest, fabricating disinformation on behalf of their largest contributors to the network.

The game works like this…
Make Dr. Wakefield into a fictional al-Qaeda archetype character by using the word ‘discredited’ over and over… However, ANY ‘proof’ of Dr. Wakefield’s ‘discrediting’ is NOT discussed. Allegations were made against Dr. Wakefield that he ‘made up’ the findings and that he paid the participants in the study. What EVERYONE under big pharma payroll does not tell their ‘captive and naive’ audiences is that a.) there has NEVER been ANY proof given that showed Wakefield’s findings were fraudulent. How so? Because Dr. Wakefield NEVER once said that there, was a ‘link’ between the MRR vaccine and autism. What his research showed and what his ACTUAL conclusion he came to was that ‘additional research’ on the MMR vaccine needed to be conducted. For that, Dr. Wakefield has been turned into the modern day Galileo for people who still believe the Earth is flat and vaccines are safe. Secondly, the claim that Wakefield paid his clients in the study is false BUT even if it wasn’t, ABC Good Morning America doesn’t let it’s viewers know it is COMMON for the pharmaceutical industry to PAY participants in studies ALL THE TIME. How many college kids made a few bucks you knew participating in a study? Then the Good Morning America crew cranks up the yellow journalism machine in high gear by putting on a family blaming Dr. Wakefild for NOT giving THEIR child the Hep B vaccine. Dr. Wakefield said he’s never even discussed the Hep B vaccine with ANYBODY. Is this a family of ‘paid actors’ by big pharma?

ANYBODY AND EVERYBODY who looks into the facts behind the entire Dr. Wakefield case discovers the house of cards the entire case against him is based on. It’s such a bad case against Dr. Wakefield that one would think the many times ‘discredited’ ‘lame stream media’ would try not to bring attention to it.

Here’s the 64 million Dollar question NO ONE seems to be asking on either side of the Dr. Wakefield debate.

One thing that can be agreed upon is that ALL pharmaceutical drugs have negative side effects in different degrees. It’s a part of the historic record that the pharmaceutical industry itself has been caught RED HANDED ,over and over, covering up data on negative side effects. It’s ALSO a part of the historic record that so-called prestigious medical Journals (the front lines of the media) have AIDED AND ABETTED such cover ups. Does the word Vioxx ring any bells on this subject?

So, it IS a gross miscalculation on the part of both the pharmaceutical and main stream media industries to CLAIM vaccines do NOT in any way have negative consequences, JUST LIKE their drug counter parts. That notion is NOT even logical. This is the very reason why the all out attack on a medical professional who’s ONLY statement has been to research vaccines more thoroughly will back fire in the worst of ways for the pharmacological industrial complex.

This are the VERY REASONS why the vaccine debate is FAR from over, no matter how many times the lame stream media tells us the debate is “over once and for all”. What a joke.
Not even the vaccine created h1n1 / h2n3 epidemic in the UK could sway the public’s opinion on taking the dangerous swine flu vaccine.

So what does big pharma do? They call their ‘assets’ known as the ‘Lame Stream Media’ to beat a dead horse. So ‘defeated’ are these vipers that their own ‘assets’ even wrote articles that ‘wagging the dog’ known as Dr. Wakfield would have little to no effect on changing the public’s perception on the nasty junk they call vaccines.

Is there more than just public perception on the minds that make trillions of dollars and millions sick? Below is an article explaining how the latest ‘Galileo-ing’ of Dr. Wakefield is simply nothing more than a bullying tactic to make YOU, the sovereign and free chooser of what goes into YOUR body, the villain for NOT taking THEIR poison.

London’s Hounds of Rascalville Making a Second Run at Dr. Andrew Wakefield

January 14, 2011 by ppjg
The PPJ Gazette For ALL links.

The current round of attacks (Lancet, British Medical Journal, Sunday Times, CNN, et al) on Dr. Andrew Wakefield, a British scientist who published his research findings that stated there may be a link between autism and MMR vaccines, appears at first glance to be a continuation of London’s Hounds of Rascalville’s efforts to demonize Dr. Wakefield and send a message to other researchers who would dare blaspheme Big Pharma’s cash cows.

One finds after turning this rock over, however, what appears to be a second elite-backed agenda to force/scare Americans into taking Big Pharma’s (new-improved-multiple- purpose) flu shot with the possible ‘necessity’ of martial law to get everyone ‘safely’ vaccinated

All in the name of ‘public safety;’ standard smoke and mirrors for another elite attempt at neutralizing the Constitution—a stumbling block along their yellow brick road to global rule by an appointed (theirs) non-elected government..

A still-armed American citizenry is a second stumbling block.

A third—the Internet—looms large.

Their last try and lie at forcing the public to take their H1N1 jabs (or succumb to the ravages of a faux ‘pandemic’) was quickly nullified by the Internet. Sadly, many pregnant women and children who were herded to the front of the lines were injured by the vaccines.

For example, a large number of miscarriages that occurred among pregnant women who took the vaccine was revealed by the National Coalition of Women in a September 17, 2010 press release. The coalition put the upper end number at around 1,588, but later revised it to 3,587, ( Click to View Link )

When confronted and asked why alerts weren’t put out about the “adverse reactions,” the CDC denied the injuries and stillborns.

Links between vaccines and adverse reactions among children already have been established. Dr. Mark Sircus’ findings in an informative article “Pediatric Love Affair with Mercury Continues,” an excerpt from his forthcoming book, Humane Pediatrics, supports this. According to Dr. Sircus:

“. . .at the end of 2002, the VAERS [adverse reaction reporting] system contained

* 244,424 total reports of possible reactions to vaccines, including
* 99,145 emergency room visits,
* 5,149 life-threatening reactions,
* 27,925 hospitalizations,
* 5,775 disabilities, and
* 5,309 deaths,

according to data compiled by Dr. Mark Geier, a vaccine researcher in Silver Spring, Md. The data represents roughly 1 billion doses of vaccines, according to Geier. Dr. J. Anthony Morris, former Chief Vaccine Control Officer at the US Federal Drug Administration agrees that such evidence has great bearing on the entire vaccination question saying, ‘There is a great deal of evidence to prove that immunization of children does more harm than good’”

A legal petition was filed (December 17th) with the FDA concerning the known dangers of these vaccines. It is assumed since it has a docket number it will be heard. The petition is worth reading: ( Click to view link )

Yet, lacking a better scheme, the elite appear to be plodding forward toward a second attempt to force the public into taking the shots.

BigPharma’s World Health Organization (whose pandemic ‘authority’ is binding upon the U.S. and other nations who signed the World Trade Organization’s ‘treaty’) took the pandemic-that- wasn’t to a Level Six alert last year; awaiting orders from their elite handlers to take it to a Level Six warning that would have automatically triggered WHO’s global martial law authority.

To implement a scam.

Information circled the globe and citizen outcry—poor and rich alike—forced them to call off their plans. The Internet, the elite realized, had become a huge stumbling block—boulder, really—in the middle of their yellow brick road. Routine outings like their bogus pandemic and the Copenhagen global warming debacle appears to be forcing the Wizards of Oz into a perpetual two-minute drill.

Mistakes happen when you’re scrambling.

Simultaneously, the ‘Net continues to re-educate and renew the importance of the Constitution and rule of law for millions of Americans who’ve taken the time to inform themselves, and to grapple with the enormity of the monsters behind the havoc wrought upon humanity for profit.

Lacking a better plan, or not having the time to come up with one, the elite are back for another try with their vaccines. But they need a different boogeyman this time around having already cried pandemic-wolf. Two-thirds of America are refusing the shots.

“How do we go about convincing Americans vaccines are safe now?”

“Hmmm. . .Let’s see, everyone loves children, don’t they?”

“Yes. But all this hateful ‘Net information is keeping parents away from the shots.”

“But, that’s endangering their children!”

“And how do we convince the public of that?”

“Why not throw open our MSM floodgates, demonize and discredit one or two doctors like Wakefield, lay off normal child deaths during the flu season to their lack of vaccinations, prep the public’s mind and. . .”

“ I get it! And what if. . .what if. . .we blame the parents for not vaccinating their kids, mandate the shots for everyone, and lock up anyone who refuses to take them!?”

“In the Halliburton pens!?”

“Why not?!”

“But that might cause a revolt.”

“Precisely. We would be forced to declare martial law and. ..”

“. . .we could have the president declare it illegal to have guns! and. . .”

”. . .we could remove two thorns from our side—America’s Constitutional restrictions and the firearms—while we inject everyone and continue on with our global eugenics.”

While this conversation is fictional, the possibility isn’t. Click to View Link

Dr. Sircus concluded at the end of his article:

“This is an abbreviated chapter from my Humane Pediatrics book, which should see the light of day hopefully early next month. I have zero doubt that there are beings on this planet that are life deniers.

“These are the types of beings that would deny other people of their lives and stoop low enough to make the lives of others a misery. No matter what your belief or religious affiliation, one has to acknowledge the dangers in the world. There are inhumane Homo sapiens and there are actually inhumane pediatricians abusing the young and their parents. Obviously as a race we need to learn something about humaneness and humanitarianism.” Click to View Link-

God speed, Dr. Wakefield!

December 17, 2010

Yet Another Vindication For Andrew Wakefield: Gut Check Time For Big Pharma / Lame Stream Corporate Media.

Editor’s Note:
Most people don’t realize that Dr. Wakefield is a ‘pro-vaccine’ doctor who should get credit for acting as a professional, NO MATTER THE COST.

This so-called ‘revelation’ by lame stream media’s very own ‘Mail on-line’ (a corporate / state media giant in the UK) is really NO revelation of facts what-so-ever. If you go to Dr. Mercola’s website look up the Dr. Mercola, Dr. Wakefield video interview. (link provided below) Dr. Wakefield stated quite clearly that he had been ‘vindicated’ many times over BEFORE his own personal ‘Medical Inquisition’ (and by the lame stream corporate media) had crucified him and his research. Dr. Wakefield made it quite clear in his interview with Dr. Mercola that MANY universities / researchers verified the so-called controversial research he had done and, IN TIME, the public would become aware of what THE MEDICAL / SCIENCE COMMUNITIES ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THE LINK. The reason why universities and researchers DO NOT like to advertise that their studies confirm Dr. Wakefield’s is that they will have their funding yanked at minimum or be ‘Wakefielded’ themselves.

So basically, the ‘Mail’ should just come out and say that, what this all means is the very establishment that set out to hang Dr. Wakefield has been essentially lying to the public at the expense of Dr. Wakefield AND all those affected by vaccine damage. That’s a ‘revelation’ that really wouldn’t surprise too many people in this day and age.

Now, I haven’t read the entire Mail’s ‘version’ of this study but, my guess is the Mail’s reporter will tell the reader that…

… even though Dr. Wakefiled’s studies were correct and there maybe just slightly, if the planets are all aligned just so and, the moon is effecting the tides just right and, it falls on the correct month of the year and, Betsy the cow is back in the barn, there is a chance that a child could become autistic because of vaccines. STILL, the benefits out weigh the risks.

By The Way, Mail censors hardcore comments on their articles that DON’T tow the establishment’s line.

The Dr Wakefield Interviews The Main Stream Media / Big Pharma Hopes You Won’t Listen To.


Special Thanks To ‘Vaccine Liberation

Scientists fear MMR link to autism

By SALLY BECK, Mail on Sunday

New American research shows that there could be a link between the controversial MMR triple vaccine and autism and bowel disease in children.

The study appears to confirm the findings of British doctor Andrew Wakefield, who caused a storm in 1998 by suggesting a possible link.

Now a team from the Wake Forest University School of Medicine in North Carolina are examining 275 children with regressive autism and bowel disease – and of the 82 tested so far, 70 prove positive for the measles virus.

Last night the team’s leader, Dr Stephen Walker, said: ‘Of the handful of results we have in so far, all are vaccine strain and none are wild measles.

‘This research proves that in the gastrointestinal tract of a number of children who have been diagnosed with regressive autism, there is evidence of measles virus.

‘What it means is that the study done earlier by Dr Wakefield and published in 1998 is correct. That study didn’t draw any conclusions about specifically what it means to find measles virus in the gut, but the implication is it may be coming from the MMR vaccine. If that’s the case, and this live virus is residing in the gastrointestinal tract of some children, and then they have GI inflammation and other problems, it may be related to the MMR.’

The 1998 study by Dr Wakefield, then a reader in gastroenterology at the Royal Free Hospital in North London, and 12 other doctors claimed to have found a new bowel disease, autism enterocolitis.

Read more:

May 25, 2010

The Dr Wakefield Interviews The Main Stream Media / Big Pharma Hopes You Won’t Listen To.

Dr. Wakefield has held his first interviews since the UK smear campaign and is now clear and free to tell HIS SIDE OF THE STORY. These are MUST hear interviews! It becomes crystal clear WHY the main stream media doesn’t want to ‘allow’ him to tell his side of the story. The interviews go FAR BEYOND the kangaroo court findings. Dr. Wakefield seems very confident the professional ‘witch haunt’ against him is going to backfire in a very big way. He says the independent research done outside of his work confirms what he has been saying all along and the ‘claim’ his finding “can’t be replicated” WILL BE EXPOSED AS A FRAUD. Also, the ’12 children experimented on’ accusation is also going to blow up in the faces of the establishment that COOKED THAT ‘CLAIM’ UP as well.

His book Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines: The Truth Behind a Tragedy should be read as well to get the other side of this Dr. Wakefiled story BEFORE condemning the man.

My Commentary:
I have long been trying to make this point crystal clear. You can ‘professionally’ go after ANY drug and it is met with various degrees of resistance by the both the government and the medical industrial complex. Vaccines are treated LIKE NO OTHER DRUG. You even question them professionally, both the state and big pharma’s ocean liners full of attorneys will come to strike you down hard. WHY IS THIS? DOESN’T THIS SEEM RATHER ODD TO YOU? Why are we (the population / masses) told over and, over and, over there can in NO WAY be ANYTHING wrong with vaccines, outside a needle rash while at the same time, almost EVERY drug on the market has serious side effects.

Dr. Wakefields ‘persecution’ only ‘proves’ that the vaccine propaganda campaign is failing miserably. The PR job done on Dr. Wakefield, which is NOT exclusive to Dr. Wakefield, shows what the establishment will do to a PRO VACCINE DOCTOR!!! simply to push their dogma on the rest of us, DAMN THE FACTS.

Thank you Dr. Wakefield! For continuing your work where other doctors / scientists would otherwise shake in their boots while wetting their lab coats.

On the question of unethical research. I am paraphrasing Dr Wakefield.
We listen to parents who were ignored by both big pharma / big government who’s children were effected after taking vaccines and we investigated those children’s cases. The children were NEVER experimented on. No laws or ethics were EVER violated. We (Wakefield team) was perplexed how the court (of fellow doctors) came to the conclusions they came to. The verdict must have been predetermined. This whole fiasco I feel will come back to haunt them (big pharma, big media, big government) down the road because there is so much independent research backing up our work. We pursued our professional and moral duties (In finding out what happened to their kids) It’s a lot easier going after me then solving the problem.

A couple of other points by Dr. Wakefield.
Many professionals are starting to realize the vaccine problems.

I’m not going away, the parents aren’t going away, the vaccine problems aren’t going away and I will continue to get to the bottom of this vaccine situation. Mothers never give up and they are an inspiration to keep me pursuing the truth about what’s happening.

Part 1 of 10 interview Dr. Mecola (you can follow each video after the last by clicking on the video icon at the top.)

Part 1 of Interview (Alex Jones)

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

February 2, 2010

Dr. Wakefield, The New Dr. Bernice Eddy Case

Will it be any number of years before Dr. Wakefield is vindicated just as Dr. Bernice Eddy was when she was dragged through a similar kangaroo court of opinion when her FACTS threatened the MYTH of the 1950’s polio vaccine?

The corporate media is having a ‘field day’ with The General Medical Council’s ‘ruling’ that Dr. Wakefield fudged data on the connection between vaccines and autism. What corporate media doesn’t inform the general public on what THEY call a “court decision” is that the General Medical Council IS NOT A COURT OF LAW. As Barbra Loe Fisher accurately describes this so-called court:
“The General Medical Council does not operate a legal court of law; it is rather a medical court of opinion, where doctors can sanction other doctors and, in effect, hang their own.” If people really looked at this so called ‘court’ I believe they would find it less credible than Dr. Wakefield et al.

Since we really don’t know what ‘evidence’ was ALLOWED to be presented and which was not, there is only one thing the Wakefield case and many others like it prove. That is, historically, if any professional challenge the RELIGION of vaccines it becomes as carrier suicidal as it once was for professionally demonstrating the earth is round in the galileo area.

If people look at the ‘historic record’ ever since the likes of the Rockefeller and, other such notable family names, take over of what can be called today ‘the medical industrial complex’ one can see over and over vaccines get treated with kid gloves like no other drug. The pharmacological era of health care is more responsible for death on mankind then all the diseases had ever killed, with MAYBE the exception of the black death itself, but modern medicine is closing in fast on that one as well!

Funny there are NO REAL courts holding those accountable who hold major stock in pharmaceutical companies that tell the CDC / WHO to ‘fudge’ pandemic levels for profit. It’s hilarious that pregnant women are encouraged by this same ‘system’ that persecuted Dr. Wakefield, to take an H1N1 vaccine, where it’s own insert clearly tells them not to and that shot kills that baby!! Yet, all we get instead is, historic denial and golden promises that vaccines could never in a billion years hurt a fly.

If there were such a just court Dr. Wakefield would not only be vindicated but the mass attention on him would quickly be shifted to the guilty. Dr. Blaylock has had in his possession for quite sometime the actual minuets for an international virologists symposium with the main topic of discussion being how mercury causes autsim. Yes, you see the same ‘establishment’ that is persecuting Dr. Wakefield knows full and well the mercury autism connection. The really bad news for the public is that mercury is only the tip of the vaccine / autism and many other dangers problematic iceberg.

The high priests of the vaccine religion are mistakenly using the Wakefield kangaroo court verdict as some sort of a ‘case closed’ victory on the dangers of vaccines. Problem for them is 1.) The science against vaccines continues to mount and it goes far beyond anything Wakefield had worked on back in the 1990’s. 2.) The H1N1 vaccine scandal won’t go away regardless of this media circus on Wakefield. 3.) Probably the biggest blow for the vaccine religion is that health consumers are treating vaccines, AS THEY SHOULD, like any other health product on the market and are simply saying no “thank you”. As the high priests of vaccines found out during the H1N1 scandal, that’s one right the public will NOT have taken away from them anytime soon!

Create a free website or blog at