From Hell To Veins

April 9, 2010

Seasonal Flu Vaccine Linked to Increased H1N1 Risk. An Excersize In Damage Control.

My Commentary:
Big pharma’s OZ ‘pimp-daddy’ the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) HAD TO ADMIT not only the uselessness of the flu shot BUT THE RISKS AS WELL. However, true to corporate media form it did NOT come without a slew of damage control buzzwords and disinformation. It should be noted that total funding for ABC comes from their central government.

It’s not just the fact that over thirty years of SOUND research debunks big pharma’s cash cow, the flu shot but, one of the biggest REAL LIFE experiments happened this year confirming this very thirty years of research when the lowest turnout for the flu shot EVER was in lockstep with the mildest flu season. WELL DUH!
Please read ‘Lowest Flu Shot Turnout = Mildest Flu Season
Ill’ keep saying it AND showing the evidence that vaccines are a GREAT TOOL FOR SPREADING DISEASE! Among many other nasty things.

…and on a personal note. I was just given notice that someone close to me who had bought into the H1N1 flu shot lie was hospitalized by that shot and almost died. Her Doctor told her… “If you had NOT taken the shot it (her illness) would have been worse.” Needless to say she has sent that doctor to the pasture, so to speak. With doctors like that who needs snake oil salesmen?

With special thanks to Labvirus.com
Flu jab link to increased H1N1 risk: study
Updated Wed Apr 7, 2010 4:50pm AEST
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/07/2866522.htm

People vaccinated against seasonal flu appear to have been at increased risk of the H1N1 pandemic flu that killed thousands worldwide in 2009, Canadian researchers report.

But some researchers say the study contradicts other findings and suggest the link would be difficult to prove.

The findings appear in the journal PLoS Medicine.

Four studies led by Dr Danuta Skowronski of the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control in Vancouver, compared the vaccination history of people with H1N1 influenza to people without evidence of infection.

The studies included approximately 2,700 people with and without H1N1.

The first study “confirmed that the seasonal vaccine provided protection against seasonal influenza, but found it to be associated with an increased risk of approximately 68 per cent for H1N1 disease.”

A further three studies also found an “increased likelihood of H1N1 illness in people who had received the seasonal vaccine compared to those who had not”.

The researchers say these do not reveal a “true cause-and-effect relationship” between seasonal flu vaccination and subsequent H1N1 illness.

The observed association may also be “due to differences in some unidentified factors among the groups being studied,” they said.

Read rest of article linked at the top.

Advertisements

April 7, 2010

Mass H1N1 Immunization ‘Inappropriate’

My commentary:
This truly is a ‘Johnny-Come-Lately’ news article. The CDC / WHO were all to familiar with what this expert has to say about the H1N1 vaccination program and shot YET, these evil SOB’s pushed it onto children and pregnant women! Wall Street media did all it could to shut down and tune out ALL of the ‘experts’ that were saying the same as this expert and turn on full blast all the BS pushing the safety of the vaccine. One should ask… “Why is there NEVER two sides of the story when the story relates to vaccines? I will explain.

I never expect ANYONE who has NOT heard the news that vaccinations ARE a POPULATION CONTROL TOOL by those running the planet into the ground, to simply believe that. But don’t sit there and call me names like a spoiled child UNTIL YOU HAVE RESEARCHED IT FOR YOURSELF!

Here is a start. Ecoscience IS AN OFFICIAL US POLICY HANDBOOK. It describes how vaccines are to be used as a population control tool AMONG OTHER TECHNIQUES!! Order it, read it. Yes! The program is hidden IN PLAIN SIGHT!

Mass H1N1 immunisation ‘inappropriate’
Special thanks to Labvirus.com

6 April 2010 | by Simone Roberts Print this article Comments Share this article

The mass vaccination program for swine flu has come under fire from an infectious disease expert who says the risk of serious side effects was greater than any potential benefit for half the Australian population.

Writing in the latest issue of Australian Prescriber, Professor Peter Collignon, director of the Infectious Diseases Unit and Microbiology Department at The Canberra Hospital, said the Government’s response to the virus was “inappropriate”, fuelled by fears about its spread that were out of proportion to the real threat posed by the disease.

“Overall, swine flu has been associated with fewer deaths than seasonal influenza and is of low virulence,” he wrote.

Professor Collignon said the risk of side effects from the vaccine was greater than any potential benefit for 50 per cent of the Australian population, who were likely already immune because of pre-existing immunity or recent infection.

“In any mass vaccination campaign, those who are already immune are unlikely to get additional benefits from the vaccine, but remain at risk of adverse effects,” he wrote.

“In young people without risk factors, the rates of death and complications last winter from swine flu were very low and are similar to the risk of serious vaccine-associated adverse effects such as Guillain-BarrĂ© syndrome and anaphylaxis.”

According to Prof Collignon, around 50 per cent of people who received the H1N1 vaccine in the Australian trial had mild to moderate systemic adverse effects and 1.7 per cent had adverse effects recorded as severe.

In children, 20 per cent had moderate to severe systemic adverse effects after receiving a single 15 microgram dose of vaccine.

“It is very important that we make sure we do more good than harm with any vaccine,” Prof Collignon said, calling for large, prospective long-term studies on the safety and efficacy of influenza vaccines before embarking on further mass immunisation programs.

Prof Collignon also criticised the use of multidose vials in the vaccination program, saying it put patients at “needless additional risk” of contracting infections such as Staphylococcus aureus, hepatitis B and HIV.

Article

March 30, 2010

The H1N1 Vaccine Insert THEY DIDN’T WANT TO SHOW YOU.

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm182404.pdf

UP DATE:
Since posting the above link, the FDA has REMOVED ANY and ALL h1n1 flu shot insert information from their website. WHY?

If you want to know HOW EASY it is for ONE person to make a difference let me tell you a ‘true’ story…

I was talking with a business partner of mine and I told her NOT to get the H1N1 vaccine until she had read the insert that came with the vaccine. This, during the fall flu season when government and media was yelling ‘fire in the theater’ from the rooftops that we all had to get the shot or else we could all parish. Well. February rolled around and I caught back up with her and she said to me… “You know I would have never even thought to have asked for the insert, I want to thank you!” I said to her… See how they have us trained? She continued… Her, clients ALL said to her… “You’re going to get the shot aren’t you?” I told ALL of my clients to do the same, see the insert first. She said… They found out what I found out, if you want to see the insert you WILL BE DENIED.

All those people who would have gotten the shot ‘wised up’ and found out the same people yelling ‘fire in the theater’ did want ANYONE to see what information was in the insert. Not that I would trust big pharma’s inserts to begin with.

I find 8.1 very interesting when it comes to pregnant women. The insert has quite a different take then what the main stream medical complex was selling on TV, radio and print.

The corporate media is NOT your friend.

October 25, 2009

A Doctor Chimes In…

Filed under: HOME — nwqfk @ 3:15 p10
Tags: ,

Anonymous said…
I am a physician, M.D. Here in California no one is forcing me to get a flu shot. I got one because I did not want to get the flu. The H1N1 is not yet available, but I’ll get the shot when it is.

When your 6 month old child dies of swine flu or swine flu kills your pregnant wife, you may change your mind about vaccines.

Thimersol has never been scientifically proven to cause autism.

Whooping cough was almost extinct before crackpot lunatics like you decided that vaccines were making the sky fall.

Henny Penny, don’t get a flu shot if you don’t want one.

——————————————-

To the ‘Anonymous’ MD. I’ve been studying vaccine science for over 20 years. you want to rumble intellectually let’s go for it.

You can take 60 + shots if it floats your boat but let’s not fool each other here. You’re going to be carrying genetically altered dna / rna viral strains in your body which, if you’re a ‘real’ doctor, you should know, they will mutate and you WILL shed these viruses and SPREAD them into the population. Can you tell us ALL what the mutated viruses will be and how will they effect the population? Is this really a part of your hippocratic oath?

As a Doctor it is NOT ethical to use fear to push your agenda on the rest of us. Some even call this terrorism. The Mayo Clinic released it’s findings and stated you are MORE likely to GET h1n1 FROM THE VACCINE ITSELF than from NOT getting the shot at all. So, to scare innocent people into getting this TOXIC vaccine by threatening the lives of six month olds with NO scientific PROOF to back your wild claim up, it’s criminal at minimum.

Thimersol..
You say you are a doctor? Then why don’t you know about the peer reviewed studies that PROVE mercury from Thimersol (and other heavy medals in vaccines) accumulates in areas of the body such as the brain, liver and other organs. This was PROVEN using radio isotopes to track the heavy metals after vaccines were given. These tests (along with autopsies) also proves the non toxic mercury ion in the Thimersol converts to the TOXIC ionic form of mercury once it accumulates in the body. Oh, and doc, it HAS been proven that mercury poisoning occurs on the NANO particulate level when it accumulates in the brian and vital organs.

One last thing on autism. You doctors like to tell us how smart you are when it comes to vaccines but how come you same doctors can’t explain the reason why the autism graph and the increased vaccine schedules over time run exactly parallel with each other? Classic line you people use is… “We’ve always had it.” That is very ODD from a scientific standpoint to say the very least because, we are soon to have an explosion of autistic adults as these autistic kids move into adulthood. As far as the REAL WORLD goes, there has NEVER been an autistic ‘epidemic’ in the 20+ age bracket, the prime of life, in the history of this planet!!!!

Whooping cough????
Whooping cough numbers declined to almost a non issue due to improved living conditions BEFORE a vaccine for it existed !!! Again, the Mayo Clinic (reluctantly?) admits whooping cough can EASILY be treated (if even it gets to that point) WITHOUT A VACCINE. Including infants and children.
.
I won’t get a flu shot for the simple scientific FACT they DON’T work and are chalk-full of contaminates.

If you or ANY doctor wish to debate the vaccine issue in front of a LIVE audience with another doctor who warns against them please contact Dr. Russel Blaylock MD Dr Russel Blaylock and let the court of public opinion decide.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.