From Hell To Veins

October 8, 2015

Flu Shots / High Crimes By Corporate News Networks & Conflict Of Interest

IF YOU ARE PREGNANT AND YOU ARE CONSIDERING GETTING A FLU SHOT,  PLEASE DO NOT TAKE THE ADVISE FROM YOUR LOCAL NEWS NETWORK.  PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH BEFORE YOU GET INJECTED!

USA’s Corporate News Networks Pushing Vaccines On Children & Pregnant Women in Local Areas And, NOT Disclosing Conflict Of Interest With Drug Companies Is A Crime.

People, you need to be wise about this. The major networks that give you the ‘so-called’ news are heavily funded by the drug companies and NEVER pushed shots on their audience UNTIL the struggling networks started taking drug money from big pharma.  This pushing vaccines for the drug companies USED TO BE considered UNETHICAL by the news industry. This conflict of interest is a HIGH CRIME, because the local networks do NOT disclose their conflict of interest when ‘claiming’… “It is perfectly SAFE for pregnant women to receive a flu shot” Where are the peer reviewed double blind safety studies to make such claims?

You need to ask yourself… why are the local news networks NOT telling pregnant woman what science has known about the influenza virus for decades, and how the flu shot could actually quadruple schizophrenia in their unborn child, along with the numerous toxicity issues related to the flu vaccine?  Even though the cat has long been out of the bag, that you greatly increase your chances of getting the flu if you get a flu shot.  Plain insanity!

Pregnant women and children can boost their immunity so many ways WITHOUT taking a damn vaccine!

TELLING PREGNANT WOMEN TO GET A FLU SHOT SHOULD BE A HIGH CRIME.  WHAT THE CORPORATE VACCINE PUSHERS DO ‘NOT’ DISCLOSE ABOUT FLU SHOTS.

Confirmed! Flu Vaccine INCREASES Risk of Serious Pandemic Flu Illness

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/09/18/flu-shot-increases-flu-illness.aspx

http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/study-flu-vaccine-causes-5-5-times-more-respiratory-infections-a-true-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-study/

http://www.newsmax.com/Health/Headline/flu-shots-vaccine-thimerosal/2014/11/20/id/608614/

http://saveourbones.com/flu-shot/

Even the corporate conflict of interest news had to admit “OOPS” the H1N1 vaccine gave rise to the pandemic.

Flu Vaccination: The Hidden Risks

http://vactruth.com/2013/02/01/8-damn-good-reasons/

http://www.naturalnews.com/037323_flu_vaccines_junk_science_toxicity.html 

http://www.naturalnews.com/045418_flu_shots_influenza_vaccines_mercury.html

September 7, 2015

Ben Carson, Yet Another Big Pharma Corporate Fascist Sellout.

Mannatech DISTRACTION Update:

The corporate media has a golden rule… “NEVER ask the ‘right’ questions and the public will be none the wiser.”

The mainstream media is pulling out ALL the stops to get you distracted from THE REAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ISSUE concerning ‘big pharma’ Ben Carson.

The ‘corporate’ media is flapping it’s collective gums over Ben Carson’s ‘endorsement’ of the supplement Mannatech. Big pharma pusher / promoter MSNBC brought up the Mannatech issue during their GOP debate. Neither MSNBC nor, any of the other ‘copy cat’ corporate media outlets want to disclose Ben Carson’s REAL connection to the vaccine industry via ‘Vaccinogen‘.

The corporate media beating this Mannatech drum admits that big pharma Ben Carson is not nor, ever was, on the Mannatech payroll. He simply takes the product and endorses it. If Carson wants to take that stuff that’s his business. HOWEVER, and it’s a BIG however. If big pharma Ben Carson wants to FORCE me / my children to take big pharma products that have more false claims and side effects than ANY supplement on the market, then Ben Carson is invading MY personal space, and he is getting into MY business. That’s the ‘news’ the corporate media seems to loose.

What should have been asked by MSNBC
Did you not say US citizen should be forced to take vaccines? Yes or No.

Is this statement of yours NOT a conflict of interest since you where the chairman of a vaccine manufacture, ‘Vaccinogen’?

Mr. Carson. Why is it that the cancer vaccine industry sees cancer vaccines as a “BOOMING FUTURE MARKET”? Isn’t the medical industrial complex SUPPOSED to be spending the billions of dollars on cancer ‘CURE’ research which is ‘supposed to actually’ lessening cancer? So tell us ‘why’ do vaccine manufactures see cancer as a “booming” business. (Please read ‘Vaccines Cause Cancer‘)

We heard NO such questions asked by the same corporate media that receives a great part of ‘THEIR’ income from the pharmaceutical industry.

All of these questions are explored in detail in this Ben Carson article

Update On Ben Carson’s Exposure

I would like to share with you some interesting developments on the ‘exposure’ doctor Carson has received over his conflict of interest between his ‘mandatory’ vaccine stance and his direct connection to the vaccine / biotech industry.

The exposure issue for ‘ANYONE’ serving or wanting to serve in a ‘public’ office is one of great importance to the vaccine / drug / pharma lobby machine.  The pharma lobby ‘fears’ this very REAL exposure between their ‘agents’ and public SERVANTS like a vampire fears the light of day.  It can NEVER be underestimated just how important exposing public servants link to the mega pharma lobby is in regards with shutting down their criminal takeover of our God given rights to choose what goes into our OWN body.

Conflict of interest is such a damning issue for the drug companies that I strongly believe that California’s draconian health violating law SB 277 could be overturned if, a PUBLIC investigation was conducted linking the very members who proposed and passed the SB 277 law to the pharma lobby.  Case in point… Colorado Rep. Dan Pabon, D-Denver. had been working behind closed doors with Sundari Kraft who has her very own pharma front groups posing as ‘grassroots’ vaccine organizations.  see… ‘Voices For Vaccines Task Force For Global Health’s Russian Doll‘ to better understand the blatant pharma lobby connection concerning Kraft.  After meeting behind closed doors with pharma rep Kraft, Colorado Rep. Dan Pabon, D-Denver introduced a big pharma friendly bill requiring anyone seeking a vaccine exemption, would have to ‘first’ be tied to a chair and lectured on vaccine lobby propaganda (by a doctor who already has a conflict of interest) with NO information on all the science / facts behind the dangers to the very vaccines they’re claiming as “safe”.  Just like in California, there also was a ‘corporate’ media blackout on this proposed legislation.   After ‘exposing’ the lobby connection and the bill itself, the colorado vaccine bill has gone dormant.  Exposure linking conflict of interest between legislation and vaccine policy pushers, is extremely important to our fight for health freedom no matter your stance on vaccines.

Ben Carson Update:

The FACT of Ben Carson’s connection to the vaccine industry has been picking up traction, and this fact has even been making it’s way into the corporate media.  As a response to these revelations, Ben Carson first toned down his ‘mandatory’ vaccine rhetoric.  Momentum continued to grow over his blatant conflict of interest over the vaccine mandate issue that, it should be NO surprise,  Ben Carson needed to ‘deflect’ this growing awareness by getting himself tied up with the muslim issue.  Ben Carson’s muslim issue has taken attention away from the issue of his conflict of interest with big pharma.

How big of a deal is this conflict of interest with Ben Carson anyway?  Let me give you a ‘real life’ example of just how big a deal his (or any other politician’s) connection to the pharma lobby is…

I was emailed information that a caller to a corporate media LOCAL talk show, had brought up the facts of Ben Carson’s conflict of interest with regards to the vaccine issue.  The corporate media talk show host blew a gasket with the caller and the hour (out of three) which the caller presented these facts was OMITTED from the archives and rebroadcast.  You see, the corporate entities that owns your local ‘talk show’ (and the host I might add) gets a tremendous amount of revenue from the pharma corporations (they may own stock in them as well) and act as a ‘lobby’ for them.   To omit an entire hour of a show to keep the ‘conflict of interest’ issue censured is a VERY big deal.

A Reminder To Those In The Alternative Media…

Very good people in the ‘alternative’ (NOW ‘mainstream’) media, have been making an issue as to whether Ben Carson still sits on the board of Vaccinogen.  I want to strongly suggest that, while it is good to know his current status with the company, it must be explained to the public that, at this point, whether he is or is NOT on the board of Vaccinogen is moot.  We must never forget the lessons we have had to learn about the FDA / USDA and the revolving door with government players and big pharma corporations.  Once an individual leaves a pharma entity they are ALWAYS tied to that or those entities and can reconnect or receive payola at anytime in the future.

—————————————————

Original September 7, 2015 Article

There once was a day when doctors were extremely cautious about dolling out vaccines to their patients, specially children.  They knew better than to give pregnant women vaccines.  What on earth happened to that caution?  It all went out the window in America after 1986, once absurd laws were passed exempting them from the prosecution in front of juries of their peers in a court of law.

Ben Carson’s proclamation to make vaccines mandatory in the United States is so rife with conflict of interest and corporate fascism, it stinks to high heaven, and this is what this blog post is about.

Dr. Ben Carson.  Your medical resume is impressive to say the least however, your knowledge of history is pathetic.  Are you even aware why we in the United States of America, even have ‘medical exemptions’ to begin with?   In a word, ‘eugenics’.  In a couple of words, ‘Nazi Germany’ (A.KA fascism).   In three more words, ‘the Nuremberg trials’.

Please don’t give us your complete horse shit on the ‘greater good’ from your days as a socialist democrat.  You Ben Carson, are deeply tied to the investment end of the pharmaceutical industry spectrum, and you know full well that forcing your toxic products on ALL Americans will greatly line the pockets of you, and your investment cronies over at big pharma Inc.

Let’s start with your last job over at the vaccine biotech corporation ‘Vaccinogen‘ where you were the Chairman of the board of directors.  Here, you as chairman, somehow raised $80 million in new investments and was able to move the company to Baltimore to be plugged directly into Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine which was another employer of yours.

Just because you stepped down from the board over at Vaccinogen Ben, does NOT mean in any way you are independent of them or John’s Hopkins as a (for now) would-be US president.   We know all to well how the revolving door in Washington DC and big pharma work to undermine the ‘general welfare’ of the public’s best interests.

Biotech Stocks To Surge As State’s Abolish Human Right To Informed Consent.  

It’s a no brainer, that if Ben Carson get’s his way with mandatory vaccinations, that he and his corporate cronies in the biotech stock investment business will make huge profits.  We have already seen biotech / vaccine stocks rise due to the passing of California’s forced vaccine laws.

Ben Carson will argue… “but Vaccinogen has nothing to do with mandatory childhood vaccines.”  My rebuttal to Dr. Carson is.. “Au contraire”  Mandating childhood vaccines is only the first step to mandating vaccines for ALL people.  As California is already adopting mandatory adult vaccines in their draconian state.  

The U.S. judicial system is already ‘playing doctor’ by mandating Kemo for cancer patients and barring them from alternative treatments.  It’s not a stretch that cancer vaccines will ALSO be mandated if vaccines are ‘mandated’ by the state.

Your Vaccinogen corporation is in the cancer vaccine business, is it not Ben?

Ben Carson Represents The Multibillion Dollar Global Cancer Vaccine Industry NOT The American People.

According to BCC Research…
Global Cancer Vaccine Market to Reach $4.3 Billion in 2019

According to the biotech industry itself, the United States where Ben Carson wants to become president is… “by far and away the largest regional segment, is anticipated to reach $2 billion in 2019”   That’s almost double the entire global market for cancer vaccines just in the USA!  How on earth will the USA become double the cancer vaccine global market?  Is this where a nation of mandatory vaccinations equates market share?

The same industry research group has India, Japan and China market for cancer vaccines in decline of 1billion dollars, and why is that?  “The suspension of the HPV Vaccine”  Why on earth have these countries suspended the HPV vaccine?  Oh yeah, because it’s causing harm in a great number of people.

Imagine Ben, living in a country where that country actually cares enough for it’s people to remove a dangerous vaccine.  What a novel concept!  Not in Ben’s country.  In the USA, the Ben Carson’s of this world have passed draconian laws making holding vaccine manufactures accountable, like his very own ‘Vaccinogen’, impossible when their vaccines harm or kill those people.  Ben Carson’s very near and dear ‘OncoVax’ seems to be more ‘drug’ than vaccine but it manages to get vaccine legal protection status.  Must be nice, right Ben?

Forced Vaccination.  A Great Revenue Stream In The Cancer Vaccine Business?  Think SV40 Ben.

The question must be asked again….

Why does the cancer vaccine industry see the United States as it’s biggest cash cow in the next few years?  Could future mandatory vaccine laws play a key roll in this?  If so, who stands to gain?  Obviously industry insiders like Ben Carson.

Vaccines And Cancer. A Boom For Cancer Vaccine Treatments?

It may come as a surprise to some, that the data clearly shows that the countries with the highest cancer rates also have the highest vaccination rates.  The new medical model is to make statements regarding such data as… correlation does NOT prove causation”. Now, that makes for great lawyer speak but, the truth is, that any criminal investigator who uses scientific methods to solve a crime would certainly use correlation data as the starting point to solve the crime or the ‘causation’ behind the crime.

People’s Exhibit A. The SV40 Cancer Virus In The Polio Vaccine. 

Right now as of 2015, there is so much scientific peer reviewed data on this polio vaccine cancer disaster dating back from the 1950’s to date, that this blog recommends the reader to research this topic and stay current on it, as it continues to unfold every year.  A gift that keeps on giving.

The one point I do want to make on the SV40 cancer virus that was in the oral polio vaccine is that, in 1950’s Time Magazine had published a story on cancer, and Time’s own report said that this ‘cancer discovery’ was so ground breaking that it… “would revolutionize the understanding of cancer and how to cure it”.  It was discovered and proven that the majority of cancers were ‘VIRAL’ in nature.  The two women who were feature in this story were not only up for Nobel prizes but, they had worked on the infamous polio vaccine.

The pharmacological industrial complex soon realized they had a massive problem on their hands with the revelation of the viral cancer discovery.  The problem was, that the polio vaccine was tainted with the SV40 cancer virus.  The fact is, that the industry absolutely knew cancer was in the shot because one of the scientists in the Time’s featured article on viral cancers (Bernice Eddy, Ph.D., of the National Institute of Health) warned the government NOT to administer the vaccine.

Today we have many related cancers due to this virus getting into the population.  It’s been discovered that people (particularly in the U.S.) have been passing this cancer viruses on to their children now grandchildren.

The ironic thing about the SV40 vaccine cancer virus is that it is ‘rumored’ to have been hatched out of the idea of developing a ‘CANCER VACCINE’.  Just like the vaccines Ben Carson has invested in.

People’s Exhibit B FDA Report On Cancer In Vaccines…

I wish to share with you, how the FDA itself sees the roll of cancer stemming from vaccines.  Here is an excerpt…

3.1.1 Oncogenic Viruses

Viruses can be oncogenic in several ways. They can carry dominant oncogenes that directly induce a transformed phenotype in the infected cell or they can integrate into the host genome and cause the activation of cellular oncogenes or the inactivation of tumor- suppressor genes. For example, viruses such as papillomaviruses, adenoviruses, polyomaviruses, gamma herpesviruses (such as EBV), and replication-defective and replication-competent retroviruses, such as MC29 and RSV, respectively, have been shown to carry oncogenes. However, in most cases, expression of the viral oncoproteins alone is insufficient to result in cancer, and subsequent genetic and/or epigenetic changes are necessary to convert the initially transformed cell into a malignant cell.

Even though the FDA report states that the viruses in vaccines need a “epigenetic” trigger to turn them on or, make the’ ‘cancerous’, by mandating vaccines the FDA admits people who never even had these cancer viruses to begin with would NOW be potential customers for the ‘cancer vaccine treatment industry’.   This fact alone makes Dr. Ben Carson guilty as hell of conflict of interest by pushing for mass vaccination of the Untied States.

It should also be pointed out to the reader that, it is easy to research ‘stealth viruses’ and vaccines.  This is extremely important to this blog post because, vaccines are known to many, many of these ‘stealth viruses’.   If you add up all the shots in current U.S.A. vaccine schedule this would include 1000’s of these stealth viruses.  So, when the FDA speaks of ‘epigenetic’ triggers (cancer triggers) these triggers could certainly include the combination of certain stealth viruses within vaccines or even the cancer viruses being triggered by the adjuvants themselves.

At any rate it doesn’t take genius to figure out that mandating vaccines to people who would NOT normally be putting all this garbage in their veins will be lucrative to pharmacological industry on many, many levels.

January 8, 2012

UK’s FOIA Uncovers Vaccine Coverup / False Accusations Of Parents

Editors Note:
In the UK, mother of MMR vaccine injury victim Katie Stephen was determined to uncover the TRUTH about the MMR vaccine that injured her daughter. Using the UK’s version of the ‘Freedom Of Information Act’ this mother not only uncovered that the MMR vaccine was indeed DANGEROUS but, she uncovered the FACTS that the UK government known of those dangers and allowed the vaccine to keep it’s license anyway. If that wasn’t bad enough, she also discovered that PARENTS WE FALSELY ACCUSED for the injuries caused by the MMR vaccine AS A WAY TO DISTRACT FROM THE REAL CULPRITS OF THESE CHILDREN’S DIMISE CAUSED BY THE VACCINE!

It is important to note that the powers that be and, the drug companies, have pulled similar garbage here in the United States. The truth concerning the polio vaccine and SV-40 cancer virus is BUT ONE example in similarity to this latest discovery in the UK.

This report ALSO exposes the corruption at UNICEF. UNICEF has its ‘founders’ roots entrenched deeply into the ‘eugenics religion’. UNICEF is one of the most corrupt globalist created wrecking balls on humanity, window dressed as a ‘loving & caring’ organization. Super eugenists Bill an Melinda Gates fund and direct this corrupt cesspit of an organization.
——————————————————————————————
Freedom Of Information Request Reveals Major Government Vaccine Conspiracy
VacTruth.com

By Christina England | January 3rd, 2012

Sometimes the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act provides us with a little gem. Thanks to Wendy Stephen the mother of MMR victim Katie Stephen. [1] sending in a FOI request on an unrelated topic, I am now able to prove that Munchausen by Proxy expert Prof Roy Meadow was involved in government meetings discussing vaccinations and adverse reactions for a total of 5 years, from 1987 – 1991 inclusive. These meetings were held during the most crucial period in vaccination history when the MMR vaccine Pluserix was being used. The meetings were with the ARVI (Adverse Reactions to Vaccinations and Immunizations), CSM (Committee for the Safety of Medicine), the ARVI and the JCVI (Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunization) and finally the CSM and the ARVI. Shortly after this time accusations of MSBP soared especially after parents complained that their child had been injured by a vaccine.

(Pluserix was introduced in 1988 and banned in 1992)

A LITTLE HISTORY

Before I provide the details of exactly what we have discovered and what this discovery means, I will give a brief history. Psychologist and autism expert Lisa Blakemore-Brown was and still is one of the most influential professionals the world has ever seen when it comes to vaccines being linked to falsely labeling parents with Munchausen by Proxy; the problem is few really recognized her true genius and of those who did, some, sought to destroy her career and reputation.

As early as 1995/1996 Blakemore-Brown suspected two powerful and influential men, Dr David Southall and Professor Roy Meadow were involved in researching adverse reactions to vaccines. She believed that they then used their knowledge and influence to falsely accuse parents of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (MSBP) after a vaccine injury had occurred.

(Munchausen by Proxy is a diagnosis given to a mother or care giver who appears to be presenting a healthy child to the medical profession saying that their child is ill.)

Due to paperwork that I now have and my own research I have been left in little doubt that Blakemore-Brown was right on all counts.

UNVEILING OF THE TRUTH

A short while back I exposed what Southall had been up to.[2] I proved with evidence that Southall had been writing papers on children dying after vaccines as early as 1987 and between 1993 and 1995 Southall was consultant health advisor to UNICEF in the former Yugoslavia. This was just after Pluserix was banned in the UK whilst keeping the UK license. UNICEF was one of the vaccines takers after the ban.

Meadow rose to fame in 1977 when he wrote a controversial paper on Munchausen by Proxy for the Lancet. The paper entitled ‘The Hinterland of Child Abuse’ [3] gives two highly suspect case studies as “evidence” of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy existence. The paper was deemed problematic by many because the second case study describes a child presenting with excessive sodium in the blood. During Meadow’s discussion he discloses that this child was force-fed 20 g of sodium, with difficulty, by himself and his colleagues. Sadly the child died!

In 2005 Blakemore-Brown revealed papers that she had received through FOI (Freedom of Information) which proved that Prof Meadow had been involved in meetings with ARVI, a sub group of the JCVI devised to specifically look at adverse reactions to vaccines.[4] This was in 1987, 1988 and 1989.

The papers I now have prove that he was involved in many more.

Wendy Stephen’s emailed me several documents on an unrelated topic including documents entitled ‘Annual Reports 1989, 1990 and 1991’[5] when I searched through them I noticed that Meadow’s name cropped up again and again. Intrigued I delved deeper and was surprised to discover just how many meetings this man had attended. I was particularly interested because up until this time I had only seen Meadow’s name in meetings held during 1987, 1988 and 1989.

THE CRUCIAL YEARS

The years 1989, 1990 and 1991 were crucial years in UK’s vaccination history because the MMR vaccine, Pluserix, was being used. The Pluserix vaccine containing the Urabe mumps strain manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline had been banned in Canada under the name Trivirix in 1988. Suddenly that same year with the new name Pluserix it was introduced into the UK by the JCVI. Four years later however, in 1992 it was banned in the UK after it was revealed that children developed many life threatening adverse reactions after receiving this vaccine. [6]

During the meetings that Meadow attended the committee’s discussed the wide range of adverse reactions that children were suffering after being given this vaccine. These included mumps, deafness, seizures meningitis, encephalitis and death. Despite life threatening adverse reactions the committee members decided the vaccine would keep its UK license even though they were banning its use in the UK.

A UK license attached to a drug or vaccine is very prestigious and is a recommendation that the drug or vaccine is safe. This gives a green light to other countries and organizations wishing to buy the product. The various committees felt that taking away the Pluserix license would cause mass panic around the world and for this reason the license was kept in place. This dangerous vaccine was then shipped for use in the third world where it remains today. Among its buyers was and still is UNICEF.

MEADOW’S SECRETS REVEALED

It had been clear from the paperwork that I had already seen that Meadow had been involved in meetings with the ARVI [7] but then it had seemed that he had disappeared, or so I thought. It now materializes that he definitely did not because this new paperwork reveals exactly what he was up to right until Pluserix was banned in the UK.

In 1987 Meadow was involved in ARVI meetings and a joint CSM and JCVI meeting. [7]
In 1988, 1989 he appears in ARVI meetings and also in CSM meetings.[8]
In 1990 he appears in a joint meeting between CSM and ARVI [9]
In 1991 he is found in a joint meeting involving the JCVI and ARVI [10]
After that it appears that he disappeared completely from the vaccine committees.

Another interesting fact is that leading up to Meadow’s involvement he wrote a large number of papers on the topic of MSBP and again immediately after.[11]

To demonstrate just how sinister the nature of these meetings was, it is best that you understand exactly what was being said at this time. I suggest that you read the paper by Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD entitled ‘The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI): are they at odds?’ because she reveals the true extent of what was being discussed. [12]

WAS MEADOW USED AS ‘MISDIRECTION’ BY THE UK GOVERNMENT?

So why was an expert in MSBP involved in meetings on the adverse reactions to vaccines, unless, of course, he was brought in to be used as ‘misdirection,’ by the UK government? Misdirection is a tool often used in magic to take the audiences attention away from one area and focus it on another for split seconds however, ‘Common Purpose’ [13] uses misdirection as a tool to misdirect their subject’s minds. ‘Common Purpose’ for those who do not know is where powerful organizations like governments and pharmaceutical industries use Neuro-Linguistic Programming NLP a form of brainwashing, to get the majority of people to think, act and behave in a certain way, the example in this case to get the general population to believe that vaccinations and drugs are good and will benefit their health. I feel I should add that NLP used in the correct way is good and has helped people to get over fears and phobias.

MEADOW’S CONFLICTS OF INTEREST WITH BEECHAM, BOOTS AND FERRING

Another fact revealed in the documents that I found particularly interesting is that the Annual Reports list all the conflicts of interest of each committee member involved in regulating the safety of vaccines and medications. Listed is every committee except the JCVI in the UK in 1990. The documents do include members of the CSM and the ARVI. [5]

It is interesting to see in black and white just who has conflicts of interest with which drug company. I found the chairman of many of the meetings Professor A.W. Asscher exceptionally interesting because he had 25 conflicts of interest including links to Glaxo the manufactures of Pluserix. Mind you he wasn’t alone with conflicts of interest linking with Glaxo.

Listed among members with conflicts of interest is Meadow. The Annual Reports prove that not only was Meadow involved at this crucial time in vaccine history but that Meadow declared various conflicts of interest.

In 1989 Meadow declares a personal interest of shareholding with Beecham and Boots and a non personal declaration of departmental grant from Ferring. In 1990 he declared that he owned shares in Boots and a consultancy in Ferring. In 1990′s declaration there’s no mention of Beecham. By 1991 he had lost the Ferring conflict but still had Boots.

I believe that the real reason that Meadow wanted to keep the shares in Boots above all else was that it was around this time that Glaxo was desperate to merge with Boots. [14]

It is interesting to note here that in 1989 SmithKline Beckham merged with Beecham to form SmithKline Beecham plc. Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham later merged to form GlaxoSmithKline. The headquarters of the Company were then moved to England. To expand research & development in the US, SmithKline Beecham bought a new research center in 1995. Another new research centre at New Frontiers Science Park in Harlow was opened in 1997.

In 2000, Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham merged to form GlaxoSmithKline. [15]

FIGURES OF MSBP RISE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THESE MEETINGS OCCUR

Unsurprisingly, after the mid 1990’s MSBP rates soar [16] in the UK and around the world. Amazingly in 1998 Meadow was knighted for his services to children.

Lisa Blakemore-Brown complained again and again about what she could see unfolding but her words fell on deaf ears.

In September 1998 an article in ‘The Scotsman’ written by Stephen Breen he reveals that Lisa Blakemore-Brown had been convinced that mothers had been wrongly accused of having MSBP in at least 3 cases. Breen explained that she had complained to the General Medical Council and the Department of Health and asked for a public inquiry. The only evidence of this article ever existing is in COSA Newsletter November-December 1998 – MENZ Issues. [17]

Breen wrote-

“British psychologist Lisa Blakemore-Brown is convinced mothers have been wrongly accused of having MSBP in at least three cases. She has complained to the General Medical Council and asked the Department of Health for a public inquiry.”

(The Scotsman (29 Sep 1998). ‘Witch hunt’ warning in abuse scandal, by Stephen Breen)”

This was written in 1998 and at a time when MSBP accusations were at their peak. Behind a great many of the cases going through the courts again and again were two professionals, Dr David Southall and Prof Roy Meadow. In fact it was cases involving MSBP that got both of these professionals struck off the medical register. Neither stayed struck off for long though because both were reinstated just a short time after. The question on many peoples lips is just who protects these two men?

In 2009 Meadow’s finally did the decent thing and resigned. Please read what Blakemore-Brown had to say. [18]

These latest revelations further prove without doubt that Lisa Blakemore-Brown was right all along to suspect that Meadow and Southall were heavily involved in vaccination adverse reactions and then used their power and influence to lock up innocent parents accusing them of abusing their children.

I hope that in writing this it may help Lisa Blakemore-Brown may get justice for the atrocities that she has suffered and that it may help any cases that she is still involved with involving Dr David Southall and Prof Roy Meadow.

Sadly we no longer see Ms Blakemore-Brown in such a prominent role because she had her career and her reputation almost totally ruined by those in authority as part of this major cover up. I personally believe that she carries on beavering away behind the scenes but only time will tell.

The loss of such a brilliant and talented professional has affected so many families with children with Autism and ADHD. Not only do we not have funding or support from our local authorities but we have also lost the support and understanding of a professional who had dedicated her entire life to helping support the many families who suffer.

Before I get hundreds of emails saying that this is all one great big conspiracy theory, I urge readers to look up the original definition of conspiracy. The meaning of the word conspiracy is:

1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
2. A group of conspirators.
3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.[19]

NO THEORY JUST FACT.

Sources:
1. MMR Victim Refused Compensation For Not Being Disabled Enough http://vactruth.com/2011/09/02/mmr-victim-refused-compensation-for-not-being-disabled-enough/

2. The truth of what lay behind the attempted assassination of Lisa Blakemore-Brown’s career http://medicalmisdiagnosisresearch.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/the-truth-of-what-lay-behind-the-attempted-assassination-of-lisa-blakemore-brown%E2%80%99s-career/

3. Meadow Roy – Lancet ‘The Hinterland of Child Abuse’ http://www.msbp.com/hinterlands.htm

4. Meadow’s meetings with ARVI http://www.profitableharm.com/sir_roy_medows_meetings_1.html

5. Annual Reports 1989, 1990, 1991 http://www.profitableharm.com/sir_roy_medows_meetings_1.html

6. The Urabe Atrocity http://www.whale.to/vaccine/mmr15.html

7. CSM and JCVI 1987 http://www.profitableharm.com/sir_roy_medows_meetings_1.html

8. CSM in 1988 and 1989 http://www.profitableharm.com/sir_roy_medows_meetings_1.html

9. CSM and ARVI 1990 http://www.profitableharm.com/sir_roy_medows_meetings_1.html

10. JCVI and ARVI 1991 http://www.profitableharm.com/sir_roy_medows_meetings_1.html

11. What is, and what is not, ‘Munchausen syndrome by proxy ? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1511135/pdf/archdisch00624-0074.pdf

12. Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD entitled ‘The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI): are they at odds?’11 http://www.autism.com/pdf/families/MBSP_unabridged.pdf

13. Common Purpose http://thelastoutpost.com/video-2/new-world-order/commonpurposeexplained.html

14. THE MONOPOLIES COMMISSION Beecham Group Limited And Glaxo Group Limited (Now a wholly owned subsidiary of Glaxo Holdings Limited) 1972 http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/rep_pub/reports/1970_1975/fulltext/063c01.pdf

15. GlaxoSmithKline History Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GlaxoSmithKline#History

16. Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy/Factitious Disorder By Proxy William R. Long, M. Div., Ph. D., J. D.; July 12, 2008 http://www.autism.com/pdf/families/MBSP_unabridged.pdf

17. Breen Cosa Newsletter Nov – Dec 1998 Vol 5 No 8 – ‘Accusations of Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy is the new witch hunt’ http://menz.org.nz/cosa/newsletters/november-december-1998/

18. SIR ROY MEADOW REMOVES HIMSELF FROM THE GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL REGISTER By Lisa Blakemore Brown Psychologist http://www.whale.to/vaccine/Sir%20Roy%20Meadow%20Removes%20Himself%20From%20GMC%20Register,%20Blakemore%20Brown.pdf

19. The Free Dictionary – Conspiracy http://www.thefreedictionary.com/conspiracy

November 11, 2009

Oprah’s Dr. OZ Caught In Major Vaccine Conflict Of Interest

UPDATE
As a response to this article by Natural News, SIGA Technologies sent out their PR dogs to try and get Natural News to retract the MOST DAMNING fact within the article, that is, SIGA Technologies being tied to the vaccine industry. It didn’t take long for Natural News to uncover SEVERAL DOCUMENTS tying SIGA Technologies to the vaccine industry.

Question back at SIGA Technologies. Do you REALLY want to take this to court and, even further, take this to THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION? Because, this will be all over mainstream news due to Dr. Oz pushing vaccine’s on Oprah.
—————————————————————

Natural News responds to SIGA Technologies threat.

When Dr. Oz tells YOU to get and give the H1N1 vaccine to YOUR kids, PLEASE understand why HIS kids didn’t get it. Also, question the validity of Dr. Oz’s Claim he actually took the vaccine.

Source & Links
(NaturalNews) Dr. Mehmet Oz is a huge promoter of vaccines. He’s been on television reinforcing fear about H1N1 swine flu and telling everyone to get vaccinated. But what he didn’t tell his viewing audience is that he holds 150,000 option shares in a vaccine company that could earn him millions of dollars in profits as the stock price rises. It is in Dr. Oz’s own financial interest, in other words, to hype up vaccines and get more people taking them so that his own financial investments rise in value.

Evidence describing these facts was delivered to NaturalNews by a private investigator named Joseph Culligan (http://webofdeception.com/oprah.html#oz). That evidence includes an SEC document detailing how Dr. Oz. bought options on stocks for SIGA Technologies in 2005, 2007, 2008 and 2009. SIGA Technologies (stock symbol SIGA) is a vaccine technology company with many advanced developments whose success depends on the widespread adoption of vaccines. According to SEC documents, Dr. Mehmet Oz. currently holds 150,000 option shares on SIGA Technologies, purchased for as little as $1.35 back in 2005.

At the time of this writing, SIGA Technologies is trading at $7.10, making those options bought in 2005 worth $5.75 in profits today. If all the 150,000 options purchased by Dr. Oz. were exercised today, they would be worth roughly $180,000 in profits (they were bought at different prices, not all at $1.35). This is all revealed in what the SEC website calls an “insider transaction” document (link below).

These options won’t expire until the years 2015 – 2019, and the higher the stock price of SIGA gets before then, the more profit can be realized when these options are cashed out. You can see the 2019 expiration date in this “insider transaction” form: http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/…

If the stock price of SIGA Technologies could be pumped up even more — say, from someone hyping up vaccines in front of a national audience — these options could mathematically be worth millions of dollars. Just to clarify, by the way, SIGA Technologies doesn’t currently manufacture a vaccine for H1N1 swine flu. It focuses on future vaccine technologies that could be applied to many different vaccines down the road.

Dr. Oz. isn’t merely a holder of SIGA stock options, by the way: He’s on the Board of Directors! As SIGA’s own website explains, Dr. Oz has served on the board since 2001 and continues his role there today. This brings up the obvious question:

Is it right for someone talking about whether vaccines are safe on television to also be carrying stock options and serving on the board of directors of a vaccine company at the same time?

Just to make things a little more interesting, SIGA Technologies recently received a $3 million grant in taxpayer dollars from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The purpose of the grant money? To fund the study of a chemical adjunct named ST-246 to be used in future vaccines. So taxpayer money is now being used to fund a vaccine technology company whose stock price increases will financially benefit the very celebrity doctor who is hyping up vaccines to a national audience.

Something sounds fishy here…

Conflict of interest?
To my knowledge, Dr. Oz. has never disclosed to his viewing audience the fact that he owns 150,000 option shares of SIGA Technologies. And yet, with an audience of millions, Dr. Oz has continued to beat the drum of the vaccine industry, urging people to get vaccinated while implying that vaccines protect people from swine flu (even though there is absolutely no scientific evidence to back up that claim).

Here’s a link to the SEC document detailing Dr. Oz’s ownership of these 150,000 option shares:
http://sec.gov/cgi-bin/own-disp?act…

The current value of SIGA shares can be verified here:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SIGA

Information about SIGA Technologies and their vaccine technology can be found on their website:
http://www.siga.com/index.php?ID=2

The press release announcing SIGA’s receipt of $3 million from the NIH is available here:
http://www.siga.com/?ID=120

The RealAge Big Pharma front group
In addition to holding stock options in a vaccine technology company, Dr. Oz. is also a front man for the RealAge website, a sort of “health front group” for the pharmaceutical industry that uses information provided by RealAge members to solicit consumers with pro-pharma marketing message targeted by age or health condition.

Corporate sponsors of RealAge include most of the major drug companies and their most profitable pharmaceutical products such as Adderall, Ambien and Celebrex. The companies sponsoring RealAge include GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Wyeth and many others. RealAge is essentially a marketing platform for Big Pharma, disguised to look like a consumer health information service.

The New York Times calls RealAge “a window for drug makers” (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/t…) and explains, “The test has received widespread publicity because of its affiliation with Dr. Mehmet Oz.”

This NY Times article goes on to explain how the RealAge scheme operates:

People come to the site, then provide an e-mail address to take [the RealAge test]. They are asked throughout the test if they would like a free RealAge membership. If people answer yes to any of the prompts, they become RealAge members, and their test results go into a marketing database.

RealAge allows drug companies to send e-mail messages based on those test results. It acts as a clearinghouse for drug companies, including Pfizer, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline, allowing them to use almost any combination of answers from the test to find people to market to, including whether someone is taking antidepressants, how sexually active they are and even if their marriage is happy.

RealAge sends the selected recipients a series of e-mail messages about a condition they might have, usually sponsored by a drug company that sells a medication for that condition.

The RealAge ads seen all over the internet do not openly disclose that taking the RealAge test gets you signed up to be solicited by Big Pharma for medication advertisements. Dr. Oz’s continued promotion of this service has exposed tens of millions of health consumers to this deceptive marketing front for Big Pharma.

How much has Dr. Oz earned from his affiliation with RealAge? He isn’t saying.

Front man for Big Pharma?
In my view, Dr. Mehmet Oz. is a front man for Big Pharma and the vaccine industry. He’s pushing vaccines for his own personal financial gain while championing one of the largest internet Big Pharma marketing scams yet concocted.

Dr. Oz. stands to profit millions of dollars from helping creating demand for vaccines, and yet he does not disclose to his audience this huge, blatant conflict of interest. Sadly, by catapulting his career from her own show, Oprah has inadvertently unleashed a vaccine pusher onto the general public and given him influence over millions of people who may now be corralled into services like RealAge that seek to sell more drugs to unsuspecting consumers.

I respect Oprah. She’s an amazing achiever. But I don’t respect all the wannabe celebrity leeches who use her to launch their own careers and then exploit their newfound popularity for financial gain at the expense of the public.

Shame on Dr. Oz. for his financial conflicts of interest and his strong affiliation with the deadly pharmaceutical industry. Through his actions, Dr. Oz. has aligned himself with precisely the evil corporations that are destroying health in America today. Does the man have no shame?

He may not have any shame, but he does have 150,000 stock options that could be worth millions in the years ahead.

Additional sources:
Joseph Culligan is more than just a private investigator; he’s also an author. His book When In Doubt, Check Him Out is available on Amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/When-Doubt-Ch…

It should be noted that Oprah Winfrey, wether duped into or not, met in secret with individuals that support population reduction eugenics. WHICH ACCORDING TO OBAMA’S SCIENCE CZAR IN HIS OWN WRITTEN OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT MANUAL ‘ECOSCIENCE’ INCLUDES THE USE OF VACCINES AS A SOURCE OF POPULATION REDUCTION. It shouldn’t come as ANY surprise that Oprah has a Dr. on her mega TV show that has significant financial ties to the very companies he’s pushing this snake oil on.

Below Dr Horowitz Rips Dr Oz Apart on ABC’s H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Fraud:

PART 1 of 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04gaxcrVRxY

PART 2 of 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MerH7ZU22Qo

PART 3 of 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6e0JpG0l0U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTaUE1bhD4Y

Blog at WordPress.com.