From Hell To Veins

November 10, 2011

Baxter Recalls 300,000 Flu Vaccines For ‘Serious Adverse Reactions’

Editors Note:
Here is, in my opinion, the MAIN issues with regards to this recall. First of all, it should be clear as the nose on your own face that vaccines ARE NOT THESE PURE SILVER ‘MAGIC BULLETS’ we are sold they are when they, more times than not, come with adverse effects. So, let’s stop the medical authorities dead in their tracks when they tell us in no way vaccines can do harm, OK?

The most glaring issue here that this article does NOT EVEN ADDRESS is the FACT that YOU, YOUR CHILD, CHILDREN ARE ALL GUENIE PIGS to test NOT JUST DRUGS BUT VACCINES. Let’s get real here. The so called government agencies supposedly in charge of drug / vaccine safety DO NOT WORK. At least for the people they ‘supposedly’ represent. I have documented ad nauseum on this blog how these agencies are thoroughly compromised with the drug companies themselves AND ACT AS ‘PROTECTION AGENCIES’ FOR THESE CORUPT PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES.

So, how many people had to suffer for this before the recall? Since vaccine injury is a spectrum and obviously the medical profession constantly turns it’s back on vaccine damage, the sky’s really are the limit here. Damage from vaccines can take years to develop. So, this as usual, will probably be a gift that keeps on giving.

With very little to NO oversight or accountability, you can be assured with a recall of this magnitude that the side effects are MORE SERIOUS than the mild discomfort the company claims to be the problem.
————————————————————————–

Baxter, same company that unleashed tainted avian flu vaccines, recalls 300,000 flu vaccines for serious adverse reactions

Natural News” (For ALL sourced links)

(NaturalNews) Baxter Healthcare Corp. has announced it is recalling roughly 300,000 doses of its Preflucel influenza vaccine due to what it says is an excessive number of adverse events. Baxter is the same drug company that was caught inserting Avian Flu Virus into flu vaccines back in 2009 (http://www.naturalnews.com/025760.html).

The UK’s Daily Mail reports that a high number of individuals injected with an apparently tainted batch of Preflucel have been reporting side effects like fatigue, muscle pain, and headaches. The vaccine, which was crafted specifically for those with egg allergies, has only been in use since March when it was first approved for use in the UK.

“The vaccine is being recalled because these side effects have been reported more frequently with this specific batch,” said a Baxter spokesmen. This spokesman also attempted to reassure the public that those who have already been vaccinated with Preflucel “should not be concerned (for their safety).”

At the same time, however, Baxter has instructed healthcare providers not to administer any more Preflucel, no matter what batch it came from, to patients. And since this announcement, many European countries where the vaccine was distributed have ceased using it, and have instead switched to various alternatives.

“[Preflucel] should no longer be used and any remaining stock [of the recalled batches] should be returned to the original supplier for credit,” announced the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. “No further Preflucel of any batch should be administered at this time.”

Conveniently for Baxter, no further information has been provided to the public as to what might be the cause of the uptick in adverse reactions. And if the vaccine is so harmful that the company has decided to recall several hundred thousand doses of it and cease all further administration of it, how can officials say that those who have already been injected with it are safe?

The 2009 scandal involving the US division of Baxter essentially exposed the company as a purveyor of biological terrorism. After all, the company’s Biosafety Level 3 (BSL3) facility where the tainted vaccine was produced would have prevented unintentional contamination, which implies an intentional conspiracy (http://www.naturalnews.com/025760.html). So what dirty little secret might Baxter be trying to hide with its current recall?

Sources for this article include:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a…

Advertisements

April 9, 2010

Seasonal Flu Vaccine Linked to Increased H1N1 Risk. An Excersize In Damage Control.

My Commentary:
Big pharma’s OZ ‘pimp-daddy’ the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) HAD TO ADMIT not only the uselessness of the flu shot BUT THE RISKS AS WELL. However, true to corporate media form it did NOT come without a slew of damage control buzzwords and disinformation. It should be noted that total funding for ABC comes from their central government.

It’s not just the fact that over thirty years of SOUND research debunks big pharma’s cash cow, the flu shot but, one of the biggest REAL LIFE experiments happened this year confirming this very thirty years of research when the lowest turnout for the flu shot EVER was in lockstep with the mildest flu season. WELL DUH!
Please read ‘Lowest Flu Shot Turnout = Mildest Flu Season
Ill’ keep saying it AND showing the evidence that vaccines are a GREAT TOOL FOR SPREADING DISEASE! Among many other nasty things.

…and on a personal note. I was just given notice that someone close to me who had bought into the H1N1 flu shot lie was hospitalized by that shot and almost died. Her Doctor told her… “If you had NOT taken the shot it (her illness) would have been worse.” Needless to say she has sent that doctor to the pasture, so to speak. With doctors like that who needs snake oil salesmen?

With special thanks to Labvirus.com
Flu jab link to increased H1N1 risk: study
Updated Wed Apr 7, 2010 4:50pm AEST
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/07/2866522.htm

People vaccinated against seasonal flu appear to have been at increased risk of the H1N1 pandemic flu that killed thousands worldwide in 2009, Canadian researchers report.

But some researchers say the study contradicts other findings and suggest the link would be difficult to prove.

The findings appear in the journal PLoS Medicine.

Four studies led by Dr Danuta Skowronski of the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control in Vancouver, compared the vaccination history of people with H1N1 influenza to people without evidence of infection.

The studies included approximately 2,700 people with and without H1N1.

The first study “confirmed that the seasonal vaccine provided protection against seasonal influenza, but found it to be associated with an increased risk of approximately 68 per cent for H1N1 disease.”

A further three studies also found an “increased likelihood of H1N1 illness in people who had received the seasonal vaccine compared to those who had not”.

The researchers say these do not reveal a “true cause-and-effect relationship” between seasonal flu vaccination and subsequent H1N1 illness.

The observed association may also be “due to differences in some unidentified factors among the groups being studied,” they said.

Read rest of article linked at the top.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.