From Hell To Veins

May 12, 2011

Daughter of Journalist Robert MacNeil; “Son Regressed Into Autism After Vaccines.”

Daughter of Journalist Robert MacNeil States that Son Regressed Into Autism After Vaccines

April 19, 2011
www.safeminds.org

SafeMinds and Alison MacNeil call for immediate, properly-designed and independently-conducted vaccine safety studies in an effort to identify infants at risk for vaccine injury.

Atlanta, GA.
Alison MacNeil issued the following statements today regarding vaccines. MacNeil’s family Autism story is running on PBS this week:

“When I vaccinated my son Nick, I did not know vaccine manufacturers are not required to test the safety of vaccines given simultaneously – the outcome remains largely unknown. Many thousands of parents with Autistic children report that, like Nick, their children were progressing normally until they were vaccinated, after which they were never the same again. Following receipt of the DTaP, MMR and Hib at a 15 month doctor’s visit, and a loss of skills, Nick was diagnosed with Autism at 21 months. He has since been diagnosed with encephalitis, seizures, inflammation in his gastrointestinal tract, and a mitochondrial disorder.”

“In the U.S., we mandate 36 vaccines for 14 diseases by 1st grade. This is the most aggressive vaccine schedule in the world and it is also a grand experiment. Are we trading the elimination of childhood disease for a lifetime of disability? One fifth of all U.S. children take at least one prescription medication today. Children in the U.S. are sicker today than ever before, yet few mainstream doctors dare to ask if there might be a vaccine link. This is hardly surprising, given that over 80% of pediatric revenue is derived from well-baby vaccine visits.”
“I have never met a parent willing to sacrifice their child for the good of the herd. The vaccines have become more important than the child. It is time to stop allowing our children to be used as pharmaceutical pincushions. It is time to demand transparency in the tight relationship between pharmaceutical profits and government vaccine mandates.”

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has repeatedly acknowledged that population-based epidemiology studies, which have been relied upon by the government to refute any associations between vaccines and autism, would not be able to detect a sub-set of children who may be genetically vulnerable to vaccine injury. To date, there has been no effort to understand why some children like Nick suffer vaccine injury. According to SafeMinds Director Lyn Redwood RN, “It is as unacceptable for a child to suffer life-long injury from a vaccine as it is for a child to be injured by a vaccine-preventable disease. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are responsible for both vaccine promotion and vaccine safety, which puts them in the awkward position of evaluating their own recommendations.” In addition, CDC also holds licensing agreements with vaccine manufacturers under a 1980 law which allows public-private partnerships and creates lucrative financial relationships between government and industry.

Vaccine manufacturers are also given immunity from product liability not granted to any other industry, resulting in zero financial incentive for product safety on their part.

SafeMinds calls for congressional oversight of these serious lapses in vaccine safety science and infrastructure. The United States needs immediate, impartial, properly-designed, and independently-reviewed vaccine safety studies to identify infants at risk for vaccine injury.

May 10, 2011

Link Between Governement Vaccine Settlements and Autism

Editors Note:
It seems FAUX news was granted ‘authority’ by the drug companies that pay big media’s coffers to report this.

Watching this ‘presentation’ is like watching a cat with a guilty look on it’s face when it has been caught with the canary in it’s mouth.

Note the ‘damage control‘ sandwiched in between every fact involving this probe… “Vaccines are safe! The CDC says they love vaccines!…” and on and on it goes. THIS IS A DAMAGE CONTROL PRESENTATION!! Nothing more, nothing less.

The people who demanded the investigation’s evidence and statements are posted below this video.

There’s a US Government “vaccine court” – handling all the claims that would otherwise be taken up with pharma. Instead pharma has immunity from litigation; and the taxpayers pay the fines.

Multi-million dollar awards to people harmed by vaccines; no liability to pharma.. what’s wrong with this picture?

It’s called GUILTY as hell.

If vaccines, UNLIKE every other drug, did NOT harm anyone then the kangaroo court would NEVER need to be established. If the criminal act of giving drug companies a ‘vaccine’ from lawsuits can’t wake up the deadest of the brain dead out there, nothing will wake these people up to the dangers of vaccines.

Vaccine Court: A Criminal Operation Run By Criminals.

First of all, this complete nonsense that a ‘special’ court OUTSIDE of jurisprudence had to be set up to prevent “frivolous law suits” can be debunked by a five year old. The courts are set up to NOT allow OBVIOUS frivolous lawsuits from EVERY GOING TO COURT IN THE FIRST PLACE. If an obvious frivolous lawsuit DOES get ‘processed’ for court that’s because AND ONLY BECAUSE the courts themselves allowed it to proceed. Penalties already exist for parties filing ‘obvious’ frivolous lawsuits. You only need a ‘special court’ if you are trying to control outcomes and HIDE FACTS from the public. A criminal act. Oh but, the ‘honest men and woman’ in the government would NEVER act criminally. No, no, no! Public courts create public ‘records’, and the criminal drug companies can’t have that.

Case in point…
US Government Asks Court to Seal Vaccine Records
What do the vaccine manufactures have to hide? Answer. PLENTY!
http://www.whale.to/a/vacc.html

The drug manufactures knew their vaccines were as bad for people as their drugs from the beginning. Now you have to go through a similar kangaroo court when holding these drug companies liable for all the side effects for these bad drugs.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/03/22/betrayal-of-consumers-by-us-supreme-court-gives-total-liability-shield-to-big-pharma.aspx

People like the parents launching the above probe have to start saying “enough is enough”! or more people are going to unnecessarily have to suffer from this mess created by big pharma.

Here is more ‘evidence’ on secretive vaccine courts and hush money
It seems the house of cards vaccines are built on gets one more card from total collapse each day. The talking head on TV is having a harder and harder time keeping a straight face these days when it tells YOU to go back to sleep and no need to pay attention to ALL THE MEN behind the curtian.

83 Cases of Autism Associated with Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensated in Federal Vaccine Court
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/83-cases-of-autism-associated-with-childhood-vaccine-injury-compensated-in-federal-vaccine-court-121570673.html

Government program has been quietly paying awards to vaccine-injured children with autism for two decades but continues to deny vaccine-autism link. SafeMinds calls for immediate Congressional investigations.
WASHINGTON, May 10, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The following is being released by SafeMinds (www.SafeMinds.org):
For over 20 years, the federal government has publicly denied a vaccine-autism link, while at the same time its Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has been awarding damages for vaccine injury to children with brain damage, seizures and autism. A new investigation, based on verifiable government data, breaks ground in the controversial vaccine-autism debate. The investigation found that a substantial number of children compensated for vaccine injury also have autism and that such cases have existed since 1989, the year after the VICP was formed.
SafeMinds’ Executive Director, Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN comments, “This study dramatically shifts the debate on autism and vaccines. The question is no longer, Can vaccines cause autism? The answer is clear. Now, we have to ask, How many cases of autism have vaccines caused and how do we prevent new injuries from occurring?” The government has asserted that it “does not track” autism among the vaccine-injured. SafeMinds responds that not looking is the easiest way not to find something. SafeMinds is calling for immediate federal research into the mechanisms of injury in these children in an effort to protect other children from harm and Congressional action to reform the VICP.
The peer-reviewed study looked at cases of vaccine injury that have been monetarily compensated by the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. It was published today in the Pace Environmental Law Review. The study investigated approximately 1300 cases of childhood brain injury as a result of vaccines in which the Special Masters ruled for the plaintiffs, looking for references to autism, symptoms of autism or disorders commonly associated with autism. It reports that twenty-one cases actually stated “autism or autism-like symptoms” in the court records. The researchers then identified and contacted 150 more compensated families to find out whether the children had autism. They were able to find an additional 62 cases (greater than 40% of their sample) for a total of 83 cases of autism. In 39 cases (47%) there was confirmation of autism beyond parental report.
The federal government has called autism a “national health emergency,” conservatively affecting 1 in 110 children and costing the country billions of dollars each year. If a portion of autism cases are vaccine-induced and there is evidence that officials have been “looking the other way,” this cannot be tolerated. The VICP’s recent attempt to dismiss the over 5000 cases in the Omnibus Autism Proceedings is suspect in light of these new findings based on its own records.
SafeMinds calls on Congress to fully investigate the VICP, the only forum in which parents may bring claims of vaccine injury on behalf of their children.
SOURCE SafeMinds

March 14, 2010

Three (MEDIA) Takeaway Points

Filed under: HOME — nwqfk @ 3:15 p03
Tags: , , , ,

My Comments to Age of Autism (Which, for some strange reason, NEVER get posted.)
Quite frankly IMHO, the term ‘VACCINE SAFETY’ is an oxymoron.

Great points.

However, I will not stop bringing this 10 ton elephant in the living room up.

People ALSO need to know, and tell the press so they (the press) can’t ‘claim’ ignorance. That the CDC ‘in there own admission’ know that NOT ONLY is there a link between vaccines and autism but they also know the link between vaccines and other neurodevelopmental disorders including tics, speech and language delays, and possibly to ADD. This was the discovery concerning ONLY thimerosal in vaccines. The CDC’s ‘experts’ found compounded disorders from vaccines occur from aluminum and many other adjuvants. Next question, what kids of disorders occur when they’re all combined?

The CDC assembled 51 scientists and physicians of which five represented vaccine manufacturers. These included Smith Kline Beecham, Merck, Wyeth, North American Vaccine and Aventis Pasteur. The CDC meeting was called ‘Scientific Review of Vaccine Safety Datalink Information’

These documents from this bomb shell meeting were given to congress and it took a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to pry it loose from them. So, this isn’t some ‘theory’, this DOCUMENT is hardcore evidence of vaccine cover ups by the CDC and participating parties.

The documents PROVES beyond a shadow of ANY doubt that the CDC, physicians representing the National Immunization Program, and the participating drug companies know the neurodevelopmental disorders concerning thimerosal (in particular) but CHOSE TO DISCLOSE JUST THE OPPOSITE TO THE PUBLIC.

It’s time to stop playing games. There needs to be accountability in this ‘age of NO accountability’.

I am going to share your great points with my blog followers. However, I am also going to share this bombshell document that the great Dr. Blaylock FOIA’ed to get with my readers as well. Because, THEY can handle the truth, and if the media ever has the guts to interview myself or one of my readers the press will have been informed.
http://www.whale.to/a/blaylock.html

Thank you.

-John
————————————————–

1. The Special Masters protected the vaccine program – and denied justice to vaccine-injured children.

2. Vaccines cause autism – this Court and HHS have previously acknowledged that.

3. These decisions highlight the inadequacy and possible suppression of vaccine safety science.

1. The Special Masters protected the vaccine program – and denied justice to vaccine-injured children.

a. The Special Masters’ denied compensation to the King, Mead and Dwyer families apparently out of the misguided government policy that their role is to protect the vaccine program before doing justice for vaccine-injured children.

b. They apparently believe that if they acknowledge that mercury causes autism, parents will stop vaccinating their children. Based on this policy, the court failed to weigh the evidence in an impartial way.

c. The scientific evidence at the hearing that mercury causes neurological and immune damage to infants leading to autism was credible and strong.

d. The petitioners met their burden of proof to show that the thimerosal-containing vaccines (TCVs) they received more likely than not contributed to their autism. These petitioners will likely appeal.

2. Vaccines cause autism – this Court and HHS have previously acknowledged that.

a. HHS conceded in the 2008 Poling case that Hannah Poling’s autism was caused by vaccines affecting her mitochondrial condition.

b. In another Court of Claims decision, Banks v. HHS, the Court held that vaccines caused the child’s acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) which, in turn, caused the autism spectrum disorder PDD-NOS.
3. These decisions highlight the inadequacy and possible suppression of vaccine safety science.

a. There is overwhelming, uncontested scientific evidence that mercury causes neurological damage and immune dysfunction.

b. The health of these children improved dramatically when they were treated for heavy metal toxicity and immune dysfunction. Their condition was treatable, not immutable.

c. The government removed thimerosal from routine childhood vaccines because of safety concerns.

d. The government has failed to do serious research on children with regressive autism.

e. Until December 2009, the Centers for Disease Control denied any real rise in autism prevalence.

f. Petitioners were unable to gain access in this Court to taxpayer-financed data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, the most important source of data on vaccine safety.

g. HHS’ assertion of no thimerosal-autism link is dubious.

4. These test cases further erode trust in the National Immunization Program, when trust is already at an all-time low.

a. There is a crisis of confidence in the U.S. vaccine program.

b. A recent study of the American Academy of Pediatrics found that half of all parents have serious concerns over vaccine side effects, and one in four believe that some vaccines cause autism.

c. Parents will not participate in a program that is not as safe as possible or that fails to compensate those who are injured.

5. These test cases highlight the failure of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

a. Simply put, vaccine cases in the Court of Federal Claims are fundamentally unfair. Petitioners fight for compensation at a tremendous disadvantage.

b. Government actors defend a government program, using government-financed science, before government judges.

c. In countless ways – a short statute of limitations, an extremely adversarial atmosphere, no jury, inadequate procedural rules, extremely limited discovery – the deck is stacked against petitioners.

d. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program should be radically reformed or abolished.

6. We lost this round, but we will win this war.

a. The truth will win out. This is the beginning, not the end of this issue.

b. These cases will be appealed; the previous Omnibus test cases on MMR and autism are already in the appeals process. The Cedillo appeal will be argued later this spring.

c. The Supreme Court took Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, a vaccine injury case, and will hear it this fall. It will decide whether petitioners in vaccine court can file in civil court to claim that a vaccine design was defective.

d. The Thorsen investigation will continue.

e. Contact your Senators and your Congressional Representatives to support the Coalition for Vaccine Safety’s call for hearings on vaccine safety.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.