From Hell To Veins

May 5, 2012

More Damage Control For Pro Vaccine. Vaccine Test Monkeys Develop Autism.

Editor’s Note:
Well, one thing’s for sure, this latest vaccine bombshell should keep big pharma’s skeptic lackeys employed ‘doctoring up’ more disinfo to keep you from seeing what’s behind the medical mafia curtain.
Cover Up Continues: Monkeys Injected With Vaccines Develop Autism

Scientists find monkeys develop autism-like reactions injected with vaccines given to children including Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) and several Thimerosal mercury-containing vaccines.

Scientists are making incredible break-troughs in some fields of research. Take for example the field of nano-technology in which scientists have been able to use just two molecules to create the world’s smallest radio radio station which communicates using just photons. Or the field of neuroscience in which scientists have been able to connect microchips to the brains of rats that allow them to upload and download memories and even transfer learned behaviors from one rat to another. Or even microscopic nano-rockets that travel through the blood stream inside of the human body.

As amazing as these technologies are it is striking that other fields of research have been frozen in time. It is perplexing, to say the least, that 43% of the US population will develop cancer and 22% percent will die of cancer while scientists and government agencies downplay the risks of radiation in everything from milk to drinking water.

Just as amazing is the surge of autism in the United States, with the latest CDC data (from 2008!) showing that 1 in 88 children now suffer from autism while studies emerge linking high fructose corn syrup in processed industrial foods as well as mercury in vaccines and dental fillings to the disease

While the rate of autism continues to skyrocket studies and scientific information continue to be dismissed as conspiratorial fear-mongering as federal regulators are at a loss for providing explanations for the skyrocketing outbreak.

Instead they refuse to ban the use of BPA in our foods or even to refuse to allow the public to know they are eating GMO foods that has been genetically modified to produce toxic pesticides that are killing humans and bees.

Now the latest scientific research out of the University of Pittsburg shows once again that monkeys develop autism symptoms when given vaccines that the government forces children to take, such as Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) and several very common Thimerosal mercury-containing vaccines which include flu shots,

Vac Truth reports:

Monkeys Get Autism-like Reactions to MMR & Other Vaccines In University of Pittsburgh Vaccine Study

A University of Pittsburgh study showed vaccines altered the behavior in monkeys.

Someone did perform safety studies the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should have mandated be performed and vetted BEFORE numerous vaccines were released into the public sector for mass vaccinations.

Lead investigator Laura Hewitson, PhD, probably dropped a bombshell when she and her colleagues completed a macaque monkey (primates) study of the very same vaccines given to children during 1994-1999, i.e., the Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine and several Thimerosal mercury-containing vaccines injected into children during that time frame when the autism spectrum disorder skyrocketed.

The results of that pilot study were published as a Research Paper in Acta Neurobiological Experimentals in 2010 and titled “Influence of pediatric vaccines on amydgala growth and opioid ligand binding in rhesus macaque infants: A pilot study.” [1] Even though there was alleged controversy revolving around Hewitson’s monkey studies, e.g., charges of conflicts of interest since she filed a claim with the vaccine court on behalf of her child, [2] the information generated needs to be revisited and duplicate studies need to be undertaken. Why haven’t they? Is there too much influence from vaccine makers not to do them? Parents need to make demands on the U.S. Congress to require such safety studies on monkeys be duplicated immediately, plus suspend all mandates on vaccinations until the study results are in. Did Dr Hewitson become another professional persona non-grata because she may have been on the right track?

Congress needs to consider seriously the Hewitson, et al. report that stated:

“Vaccine-exposed and saline-injected control infants [monkeys] underwent MRI and PET imaging at approximately 4 and 6 months of age, representing two specific timeframes within the vaccination schedule. …

“These results suggest that maturational changes in amygdala volume and the binding capacity of [11C]DPN in the amygdala was significantly altered in infant macaques receiving the vaccine schedule.” [1]

That alone should be the explicit reason for duplicating the monkey study with independent non-pharmaceutical industry conflict of interest scientists.

In this author’s opinion, no one has bigger conflicts of interest in study outcomes than the pharmaceutical makers who routinely perform them. Those are the very studies that should be subject to the same criticism as Dr Hewitson’s. Why aren’t they? Good question?

For those keeping track data, ASD went from 1 in 5,000 in the 1990s to the recently acknowledged [March 2012] figures of 1 in 88 along with 1 in 6 children in the USA having developmental disabilities. These stats were generated for data in the years 2006 to 2008. [3] There’s a 4 to 6 year lag time. Could ASD be 1 in 50 by now at the rate it is escalating?, especially since there’s a heavier push on mandates for vaccinations.

According to the Hewitson, et al. research study, biological changes and altered behaviors did occur in vaccinated monkeys, which resembled and were similar to those observed in ASD diagnosed children. However, there were no such symptoms showing or present in unvaccinated monkeys. Don’t you just gotta love those little monkeys! Guess what else the ASD monkeys came up with, and Dr Wakefield is gonna like this one: Gastrointestinal problems manifested in vaccinated macaques such as “many significant differences in the GI tissue gene expression profiles between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals.” [3] It’s been a deeply debated topic within medicine that vaccinated children who contract ASD also have GI tract issues. Personally, I gotta wonder how the British Medical Journal is going to deal with encrusted dried egg on its face when duplicate studies confirm the Hewitson monkey results. Perhaps the infamous BMJ retraction of the Wakefield article and Doctor’s professional evisceration, commonly referred to as the “Wakefield Syndrome,” euphemistically speaking is medicine protecting its vested interests.

Those little monkeys, however, came up with some other significant information that led former National Institutes of Health director Dr Bernadine Healy to voice some bon mots like:

“I think public health officials have been too quick to dismiss the hypothesis as ‘irrational,’ without sufficient studies of causation…without studying the population that got sick.”

“I have not seen major studies that focus on 300 kids who got autistic symptoms within a period of a few weeks of the vaccines.” [4]

Perhaps the most on-point quote regarding the monkey study came from Scott Bono, the National Autism Association chairman, i.e., something those who are accused of being against vaccinations have been questioning and demanding:

“To date, the CDC has conducted no safety testing on the possible harmful effects of simultaneously administering multiple vaccines to infants, and has steadfastly refused to state a preference for mercury-free vaccines to be given to children and pregnant women. It’s time for HHS and Congress to step in and take vaccine safety away from the CDC.” [4]

This author’s retort to Mr. Bono’s remark is that vaccine safety should be taken away from the Food and Drug Administration too! I’d like to remind readers that Congress is more at fault than anyone in this vaccine debacle. Congress has oversight and it has dropped the ball big time, probably due to all the lobbyists from Big Pharma who prowl the halls of Congress with deep pockets and nice expensive luncheon dates.

One of the issues I feel Congress has been remiss about is that it has not demanded safety studies and interaction of multiple vaccines studies BEFORE being placed into the marketplace. According to common and accepted knowledge, no such safety research or studies have been done on the current childhood vaccination regimen, except until the Hewitson ‘monkey business’ that was funded by independent, private money, for which everyone, I think, should be eternally grateful. However, the study had to be shot down since it was not favorable to vaccine makers. Why isn’t someone else duplicating the monkey studies? Are they afraid of becoming another victim of science? Why, when isn’t that what medical science should be all about: investigating problems and theories, publishing results, and interacting with other sciences, NOT excommunication as if they were breaking some religious dogma. Or, do they, in some vested interests minds?
For sake of the future of our nation and our children it is time for the public to stand up against this tyranny and demand that proper research be conducted outside of the influence of corporations, special interest groups, and lobbyists before this epidemic destroy the entire population.

April 27, 2012

Can We Continue To Justify Injecting Aluminum Into Children?

Filed under: HOME — nwqfk @ 3:15 p04
Tags: ,

Editor’s Note:
Injecting aluminum into the veins causes the body to react to heavy metal poisoning and does NOT mean you will become immune to disease as a result. The reaction to aluminum adjuvants in vaccines by the body is a cytokine storm spectrum. No killer T cells have EVER been produced to fight disease by this method. This is why the vaccine industry wants to play with fire by giving LIVE virus vaccines to people. There is an entire genetically altered nano technology emerging that is even more frightening but, that will have to be covered at a later time.

Can We Continue To Justify Injecting Aluminum Into Children?

Sayer Ji
April 27, 2012
A new report published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology raises a disturbing possibility: that aluminum hydroxide, the dominant metal-based adjuvant used in vaccines today, is causing aluminum overload at injection sites, and contributing to the pathogenesis of diseases such as chronic fatigue syndrome, macrophagic myofasciitis and subcutaneous pseudolymphoma. [i]

Discussed is the case of a 45-year old woman with vaccine-induced subcutaneous pseudolymphoma, a type of skin lesion characterized by collections of lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells in the skin. The researchers performed a skin biopsy at the injection site and found aluminum (AI) deposits in her macrophages. When the skin sample was assayed for AI and quantified, it was found to contain 768.1 micrograms per gram, dry weight, versus 5.61 and 9.13 in two control patients – up to 153-fold higher concentrations.

The report cautioned: “Given the pathology of this patient and the high Al concentration in skin biopsy, the authors wish to draw attention when using the Al salts known to be particularly effective as adjuvants in single or repeated vaccinations. The possible release of Al may induce other pathologies ascribed to the well-known toxicity of this metal.”

As referenced, aluminum-based (and other) vaccine adjuvants are “effective” at increasing antibody titers, but they perform this feat through the hypersensitization and/or dysregulation of the humoral pole of the immune system (Th2), which is the immunological equivalent of kicking a beehive.

While intrinsically toxic adjuvants enable manufacturers to produce more antibodies with less antigen (often a profit-motivated decision), these synthetically-generated increases in the sheer number of antibodies produced does not in any way guarantee they will target the correct antigen (i.e. antibody-antigen affinity), which is the true measure of vaccine effectiveness; in fact, these unnaturally stimulated antibodies cross-react with and/or attack self-structures, e.g. myelin basic protein, leading to the break down of immunological self-tolerance, i.e. autoimmunity.

It is a curious fact of vaccine history that while aluminum hydroxide has been injected into billions of people and has been used for almost one century as the only vaccine adjuvant approved worldwide, its mechanism of action is not fully understood, and is only being investigated with any depth in the past five years.

We know that one way in which aluminum hydroxide induces an enhanced immune response is through activating the inflammasome within myeloid cells, a key immune-mediated activator of the inflammatory response and which is known to induce cell death. And yet, without understanding its exact mechanism of action, it is impossible by principle to ascertain fully its risk to health.

Last year, a report published in the journal Current Medicinal Chemistry titled “Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe?” raised these safety concerns:

Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community. [ii]

Another study published in 2011 in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry brought up the taboo topic of vaccine-induced autism, focusing on the crucial role of aluminum adjuvants as neurotoxic agents. The study abstract is well worth reading, as you will not see this type of information reported anywhere in the mainstream media:

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are serious multisystem developmental disorders and an urgent global public health concern. Dysfunctional immunity and impaired brain function are core deficits in ASD. Aluminum (Al), the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant, is a demonstrated neurotoxin and a strong immune stimulator. Hence, adjuvant Al has the potential to induce neuroimmune disorders. When assessing adjuvant toxicity in children, two key points ought to be considered: (i) children should not be viewed as “small adults” as their unique physiology makes them much more vulnerable to toxic insults; and (ii) if exposure to Al from only few vaccines can lead to cognitive impairment and autoimmunity in adults, is it unreasonable to question whether the current pediatric schedules, often containing 18 Al adjuvanted vaccines, are safe for children? By applying Hill’s criteria for establishing causality between exposure and outcome we investigated whether exposure to Al from vaccines could be contributing to the rise in ASD prevalence in the Western world. Our results show that: (i) children from countries with the highest ASD prevalence appear to have the highest exposure to Al from vaccines; (ii) the increase in exposure to Al adjuvants significantly correlates with the increase in ASD prevalence in the United States observed over the last two decades (Pearson r=0.92, p<0.0001); and (iii) a significant correlation exists between the amounts of Al administered to preschool children and the current prevalence of ASD in seven Western countries, particularly at 3-4 months of age (Pearson r=0.89-0.94, p=0.0018-0.0248). The application of the Hill’s criteria to these data indicates that the correlation between Al in vaccines and ASD may be causal. Because children represent a fraction of the population most at risk for complications following exposure to Al, a more rigorous evaluation of Al adjuvant safety seems warranted.[iii]

Another, even more taboo topic is vaccine-induced infant death, which is often forced into the “idiopathic” category of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). A report published in the Journal of Tropical Medicine in 2011, offers an explanation for the well-known, though often censored link between DTP vaccines used in the third world and increased mortality in female infants.[iv]

Titled “Immunological Links to Nonspecific Effects of DTwP and BCG Vaccines on Infant Mortality,” researchers reported on the fact that “A number of mainly observational studies suggest that many African females below the age of one year die each year from the nonspecific effects of vaccination with diphtheria-tetanus toxoids and killed (whole-cell) Bordetella pertussis (DTwP).”

The explanation they offered is that “…the adverse effects of DTwP vaccine may occur because of the Th2-polarising effect of the aluminium phosphate adjuvant in the vaccine and because intramuscular administration of the vaccine may cause chronic inflammation at the site of injection.”

Aluminum has no known beneficial function in biology. Increasing awareness of this metal’s role in breast cancer, due to its metalloestrogenic properties, and its prevalence in our food (baking soda), body care products (e.g. antiperspirants), drugs and environment (e.g. it is used in aerosolized form in military operations as aluminized chaff), is bringing to light how important it is to avoid unnecessary exposures, especially when it concerns the health of our infants and children who are already faced with an ever-increasing body burden of this, and other highly toxic metals. It is clear that if we implement the precautionary principle, vaccines which contain this, or any other, highly toxic metal should be avoided at all costs.

April 26, 2012

The Folly Of David Katz, M.D. Huffington Post

Filed under: HOME — nwqfk @ 3:15 p04
Tags: , ,

This is a short response to David Katz MD’s blog post in ultra establishment Huff Post.

I would extend a big thank you doctor David for linking to my blog however, it only generated six hits. I get more traffic worldwide to the exponential power than what you sent me for a reason. People come to blogs like mine to VARIFY what my so-called ‘claims’ or, should I say, ‘what I am reporting’ AND, THEY KEEP COMING BACK. Why is that doctor?

Why do you suppose they come back to this blog as my traffic grows each day? Perhaps there is something called ‘substance’ here that you can’t get at Huff post?

Here is another reason they keep coming back.
Since my blog was the very first to be linked in your write up, you mentioned that the H1N1 pandemic / flu vaccine swindle was “NOT” for population control.

In the name of your profession getting reckless by pushing the H1N1 vaccine on pregnant women, how many miscarriages and stillborns were the result? Well, thousands documented. I personally knew a woman who’s doctor husband was stupid enough to talk her into getting that crud injected into her and, sure enough, little baby was stillborn. This one went undocumented. So how many deaths ‘really’ were the result of pregnant women taking the H1N1 vaccine? Can we agree on ‘A LOT’? Sounds like population control to me and my readers.

Of course we have doctors like you to use a form of lawyer speak transformed into ‘med speak’ to dance around such issues.

If you really wanted to talk about “hype and tirades”, why on earth did you NOT discuss one of the biggest hyped tirades in the ‘history’ of both your profession and big government? Why did you NOT discuss the day your profession, big government and big media ALL yelled FIRE!!!!! in the theater over the H1N1 non pandemic that never was nor, ever WOULD BE? Your profession tried to use ‘TERROR’, claiming hundreds of thousands if not millions more, were all going die unless they made both big government and big pharma a huge profit by injecting entire populations with a dangerous vaccine.

People come here because we WARN THEM about people like you. Read: ‘Swine 11′ Government Sponsored Terrorism.

They discover ALL the documentation on vaccines and population control, from the Rockefeller’s, Bertrand Russell, John Holdren (Obama’s Science Czar) all the way up to today’s super ZERO Bill Gates. No, you didn’t think we would read all the documentation but, we did. We see vaccine programs both here in the US and, across the world, sterilizing many, many people. (Can you say population control doctor?) That’s why big media like the Huff Post have people like you doctor David to, calmly (‘doctor up’) explain to the rest of us who are less sophisticated than your average Yale ‘Bonesman’ that… “Yes, vaccines cause sterility but, it’s all for the greater good.”

We may have hype and tirades over here but, what you have over at the mainstream media is ‘SMOKE & MIRRORS’. Which is giving your side ‘diminished returns’. lol.

April 21, 2012

Parents Urged To Ignore Vaccine Injury Symptoms And, Instead, ‘Soothe’ Their Babies

Comments By What Really Happened dot com. My comments in parenthesis:
First they said vaccines don’t cause seizures, remember? But now, as the truth about the seizures has come out (thanks to the internet), the vaccine-pushing doctors are saying the seizures are GOOD for your baby, because that means the vaccines are working! (yeah, they’re working alright.)

In fact, they’re now telling parents that when their babies have a vaccine seizure, they should “soothe” their babies and ignore the seizure. Yep, while the vaccine eats your baby’s brain, you’re supposed to think it’s great! (Are parents today really this dumbed down?)
As children’s brains are being eaten by vaccines, parents urged to ignore the symptoms and ‘soothe’ their babies

Saturday, April 21, 2012 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer

A recent study published in the journal Pediatrics suggests that administering one or more of the five “Ss” — swaddling, side/stomach position, shushing, swinging, and sucking — to babies in conjunction with their childhood vaccine regimens can help alleviate the physical and emotional stress typically brought about by this highly-invasive medical tradition.

Swaddling babies, or wrapping them in a warm blanket after they are vaccinated, as well as placing them in certain positions can help reduce their levels of anxiety, say researchers. Gently shushing them while rocking them or giving them a pacifier can also help to make the vaccination process move along much more smoothly and less painfully.

Though these measures do absolutely nothing to address the potential neurological damage caused by vaccines, researchers say they can “soothe” babies and help them to stop crying. According to Dr. John W. Harrington from Eastern Virginia Medical School and Children’s Hospital of the King’s Daughters in Norfolk, the methods serve as a “distraction” from the pain caused by the needles.

For their study, Harrington and his colleagues divided 234 two- and four-month-old babies into four study groups, two of which received the five Ss after their vaccinations. They found that those who received these interventions experienced less visible pain, grimacing, and frowning, according to Reuters, and they cried less.

But as good as it might be to effectively comfort a child who has just been bombarded with dozens of vaccine injections, no amount of physical comfort will mitigate the damage being done to babies’ brains by vaccines. The combination diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus shot, also known as DPT, for instance, is known to cause severe and permanent brain damage in some children (

All vaccines, in fact, come with the potential to cause permanent nerve damage, particularly in the brain. Going back as far as 1855, when Massachusetts passed the first law in the United States requiring vaccinations for schoolchildren, it was known that vaccines carried with them the risk of encephalitis, also known as inflammation of the brain (

Brachial neuritis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), multiple sclerosis, narcolepsy, Opsoclonus-Myoclonus syndrome (OMS), trigeminal neuralgia, and transverse myelitis are among the many neurological side effects that can be caused by vaccines. And none of these conditions, of course, can be mitigated with a pacifier or a blanket.

Sources for this article include:

DPT vaccine causes permanent brain damage, 150 seizures a day in young girl

April 18, 2012


Alright doctors. It’s time to put your VEINS where your mouth is.

This ‘doctor’s’ challenge goes out to the ‘militant’ doctors out there who are going on the internet and telling the world “HOW OFFENDED YOU ARE’ by people like myself and MANY, MANY others who refuse your poison called vaccines. This challenge ALSO goes out to the ‘militant’ doctors out there who verbally abuse their patients, calling the police / CPS on their patients who refuse your poison (THERE IS NO LAW REQUIRING ANYONE TO TAKE VACCINES!!!! You need to sue the SOB’s who do this.) or, just plain refusing patients for not wanting to take your poison. It’s time to either put up or SHUT UP!!

No excuses!!!
If you truly believe vaccines are as safe as ‘mothers milk’, WHICH YOU ARE CONSTANTLY CLAIMING, then meeting these ‘challenges’ to YOUR CLIAMS should NOT be any problem what-so-ever. It will PROVE BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT that you are sincere and NOT just parroting big pharma propaganda.

Challenge #1: The Legal Challenge
Write a LEGAL AND BINDING CONTRACT between yourself, your practice and ALL your patients whom you dole out vaccines to that simply states… YOU, your practice, are personally taking responsibility DIRECTLY for any injury OR death that may occur due to the vaccines you dole out.

Don’t let ANY doctor lie to you. THEY DO NOT HAVE SUCH CONTRACTS WITH PATIENTS.  Below is a ‘legal’ form for them to fill out.   Print this out and make your doctor fill it out and sign it!


Challenge #2: Doses Of Your Own Medicine.
You will agree to have a TOTALLY INDEPENDENT escort from the anti vaccine camp take you to a wallgreens, CVS or a Pediatricians office chosen totally at random to be inject with ALL 36 OFF THE SHELF vaccines you are recommending children to take including the h1n1 flu vaccine and ALL 3 Gardasil shots.

For the doctors recommending the HepB vaccine for the newly born up to 1 year olds.
The aluminum in the HepB vaccine IS 50 TIMES HIGHER THAN WHAT THE EPA SAY IS SAFE FOR ADULTS!! Therefor on top of the all the vaccines above, you must receive an ADDITIONAL 36 vaccines of HepB to equal the aluminum toxicity levels YOU are telling a new born / 6 month or 1 year old should take.

Challenge #3: Close Monitoring
After ALL the injections we want to closely monitor your health for at least 6 months.

I go online and listen to all you ‘militant’ pro vaccine doctors huffing and puffing threatening to blow the house down. Here, I giving you an honest open challenge to put your VEINS WHERE THE SCIENCE YOU SAY IS ON YOUR SIDE IS.


It didn’t take very long for stupidity and complete BS to find it way to my ‘Doctors Challenge’

God help us all if this person is an actual medical professional. This was the predictable BS I was expecting. This person’s response to my challenge went as follows. I will counter.

In response to No excuses!!!
“I have never, ever, heard a MD or DO claim that. Ever. Show me one. In medical training the risks and occaisional deaths due to vaccines are well known and vigorously discussed. When the mortality and morbidity connected with a vaccine outweigh its usefulness, it is DC’ed, just like small pox.”

From Hell To Veins Responds:
Show you ONE doctor that claim vaccines NEVER hurt anyone? WHAT!?!? Have you been living under a rock? Dr. Paul Offit said a baby could receive 10,000 vaccines at once. When REAL scientists / doctors challenged him on that he arrogantly stated a baby could receive 100,000 vaccines and the American Academy of Pediatrics supported his completely unprofessional and reckless claims!!!

Tune into the mainstream media. Just recently the Gardasil vaccine has been under fire for causing both death and paralysis to thousands of girls IN PROVABLE CASES world wide and doctors get on TV and radio ALL THE TIME and flat out lie and say “NO the vaccine WILL NOT HARM YOU”. I have read and, have had Gardasil victims write me personally where their doctor chased them down the hall with syringe in hand SCREAMING to them that the vaccine is safe. This, even after the first round almost paralyzed the same patient but, their so-called doctor would hear no part of it.

On Smallpox:
You’ve got to stop quoting Rockefeller school of medicine’s textbooks on smallpox and get your historical facts straight. One of the greatest medical minds of both the 19th and 20th century, Dr. Charles Creighton, called vaccines “the biggest medical disaster next to blood letting”. His comment was based off the smallpox vaccine disaster of the 19th century. Which was WELL DOCUMENTED in the American medical literature before the Rockefellers took over the ONCE INDEPENDENT U.S. medical schools.

Smallpox rarely even killed Europeans ‘until’ the mass European vaccine campaigns. By the height of the smallpox mass vaccine campaign (1870’s) millions across europe had died MOST OF THEM VACCINATED. That was until, people began to refuse the MANDATORY vaccines. Once the vaccine campaigns stopped, so to did the smallpox mass deaths. The USA did NOT participate in the same program and used sanitation and nutrition and stopped smallpox out breaks WITHOUT all the carnage the Europeans suffered through. However, both governments AND the pharmacological industry of that era made a literal ‘killing’ because those smallpox vaccines were NOT free.

Response to Challenge #1: The Legal Challenge

“I love the CAPITAL LETTERS THING. Freakin awesome. Really helps make you sound like far less of a crank.

Umm, Ya know that malpractice insurance that doctors and hospitals and various private practicioners of different types have to buy in order to operate? They get that because there is in fact a contract between patient and health care provider that is enforced by tort law. Health care providers can even go to jail for violating that contract, and they have. So much for your assertions.”

From Hell to Veins
I see the capitalization got your attention. It obviously works in emphasizing a point.

This time YOU show me ONE doctor who has ever been jailed, sued or even reprimanded when their patient, after receiving a vaccine, was flopping around like a fish out of water let alone killed by the damn shot.

Doctors are protected by the VERY system you call a ‘contract’ with the patient. They are protected first and foremost by the very medical boards who will pull a doctors license for curing a patient OUTSIDE the box of what big pharma DICTATES to the doctor on various treatments. As you pointed out, then there are the insurance companies then, there are the HMO’s. All onion layers protecting NOT enforcing ANYTHING on doctors. AS LONG AS THEY PLAY BY BIG PHARMA’S RULE BOOK.

My proposal is that doctors who say vaccines are safe for their patients REMOVE all those onion layers of protection from a possible suit and write a legal contract SIMPLY between ALL those he / she injects. No big pharma medical boards, insurance companies, health provider INTERFERENCE / ROAD BLOCKS. No, a doctor does NOT have a legal contract strictly between themselves and their patients. You are completely full of crap to suggest the system that protects them from prosecution is the very same thing as a direct patient / doctor contract. Or, do you just find most people are stupid enough to buy into that total line of bull?

Response to Challenge #2: Doses Of Your Own Medicine.
“I won’t be taking any gardisil because I was born without a cervix. That being said, have you seen my vac sheet? Not only am I a human pin cushion, but I got to take experimental vaccines. One was the dengue fever vaccine. Turns out it doesn’t work, but according to the developer, whom I met personally in the 90s, I am now quite protected from an infection of mouse neural tissue, so I don’t have to worry about that now.”

From Hell To Veins Response:
Au contraire!
Doctors are ‘demanding’ males take the Gardasil vaccine now. So, roll up your sleeve. ALL THREE TIMES!

Yeah, I like these ‘tough guys’ who pound on their keyboards all day with stuff like they are ‘human pin cushions” who even love “taking experimental vaccines”. Maybe they really are and the swelling of the brain that comes with vaccines has manifested itself for making such crap comments.

I’ve received many a letter form REAL human pin cushions that were in the military who have either died or are dying. They will beg to differ with your opinion. I was a human pin cushion as well and deeply regret that. I know that vaccines are loaded with cancer viruses. That information is verifiably easy to confirm. My humble appeal to REAL human pin cushions is to avoid radiation exposure AT ALL COSTS. Those cancer viruses in vaccines get real aggressive with repeated radiation exposure.

Response: For the doctors recommending the HepB vaccine for the newly born up to 1 year olds.
“Wellll, that Al level is per cc. A microscopic amount of poison is still a microscopic amount. You’ll get more Al in your system if you lick your finger after applying deoderant in the morning.”

From Hell To Veins Responds
Here is the area that if this person is a trained medical profession, GOD HELP US ALL!

They’re is a MONUMENTAL difference between licking aluminum (which I would not recommend) off an equally toxic deodorant stick and having 625mcg (just for starters) of this heavy metal inject directly into your veins. First off, your forgetting that the toxins ‘licked off’ a stick have to go through MANY immune barriers before they would ever get to the i.e. central nervous system as, where INJECTING these toxins directly into the veins, bypasses your NATURAL immune system and opens up a Pandora’s box of problems.

There is plenty of medical literature out there that supports these heavy metals and chemicals ADVERSELY affect the immune system at the ‘NANO particulate level’ when injected into the body. This is especially true for human beings who are in the developmental stages of their lives. This absurd argument that the doses OF HEAVY METALS AND TOXIC CHEMICALS are ‘too small’ to adversely effect people, especially infants and small children, HAVE been scientifically proven to be false.

Any doctor scientist that would like to challenge the above statement, the PUBLIC debate has been offered many, many times to you by medical professionals such as Dr. Blaylock who has cataloged the many years of data on the adverse effects of vaccines as both a scientist and doctor. For some strange reason you big mouths out there run and hide behind your keyboards name calling but, will NEVER put your money where your mouth is and actually debate these issues in public with other professionals.

Response to Challenge #3: Close Monitoring
“I already did what you are proposing, and I am as healthy as a human could hope for, and this after almost half a century of monitoring and revaccinations. Last week I was in a car accident. At the hospital my blood work was better than a teen aged kid. My calcium was low at 8.7, but that is due to my exercise regimen. I just can’t get enough calcium in.

Oh, and I got a tetanus shot at the ER when I went in to get checked. I feel pretty good so far. I’ll let you know if I keel over and die.”

Hell To Veins Responds
All I and, the rest of the world know, is that this is nothing more than a bunch of jaw flapping.

You sound very confident So, let’s put all that ‘tough guy talk’ to the test. Write to me. We’ll set it up to video tape the entire process.

HOWEVER, you MUST agree to the strict terms of taking ALL of the off-the-shelf vaccines and doses on camera, and you must be an ‘actual’ doctor.

Polio Vaccine Scam Created 12 Fold Increase In Paralysis

Editors Note:

The latest tragic VACCINE CRIME / CON JOB that has Bill and Melinda Gates fingerprints all over it.

As it stands, the vaccines Bill Gates SOLD to India were in fact EXPERIMENTAL vaccines. Which means, by international law Bill Gates COULD be arrested and have to stand trial for violating the Nuremberg Code.

knowing this, what does the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation do for Bill Gates? They PAY Forbes magazine to run articles calling and dressing Bill Gates up as a ‘super hero’. Rather sickening.

The question has to be asked. Did the polio vaccine campaign give rise to a super polio viral strain that the pharmacological industrial complex is purposely calling NON POLIO to avoid incriminating itself? Both strains are nearly identical. However the strain CREATED BY Bill Gates polio vaccine is a ‘super charged’ (weaponized?) version of the polio virus.

The very same thing happened with smallpox after the massive European smallpox vaccine campaigns of 19th century. Before the vaccine campaigns, smallpox rarely killed people in Europe. At the height of smallpox vaccine campaign, millions of people, most of them vaccinated, had died from smallpox. That’s why no one in Europe would take the vaccines NO MATTER THE PUNISHMENT by the 1880’s. Thus, when the smallpox vaccine campaigns ended in Europe so to did the smallpox deaths, and just like today in India, the medical mafia media claims their POISON cured smallpox when in fact NOT taking the vaccine ended the small pox epidemic.


Study: Polio vaccine campaign in India has caused 12-fold increase in deadly paralysis condition

(NaturalNews) The mainstream media has been busy hailing the supposed success of India’s polio vaccine campaign over the past few years, with many news outlets now claiming that the disease has been fully eradicated throughout the country. But what these misinformation puppets are failing to disclose is the fact that cases of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP), a much more serious condition than that caused by polio, have skyrocketed as a result of the vaccine’s widespread administration.

A recent report published in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (IJME) explains that, clinically, NPAFP is indistinguishable from polio paralysis. But according to the Office of Medical & Scientific Justice (OMSJ), NPAFP is twice as deadly as polio paralysis, and yet was not even an issue in India prior to the rollout of the massive polio vaccine campaigns.

In 2011, for instance, the year in which India was declared to be polio-free, there were 47,500 known cases of NPAFP, which is a shockingly high figure under the circumstances. And based on data collected from India’s National Polio Surveillance Project, cases of NPAFP across India rose dramatically in direct proportion to the number of polio vaccines administered, which suggests that the vaccines were responsible for spurring the rapid spread of this deadly condition.

Similarly, cases of vaccine-associated polio paralysis (VAPP), a condition in which paralytic symptoms similar or identical to those caused by wild-type polio manifest themselves following the administration of polio vaccines, are also on the rise. Not only are the paralysis symptoms associated with NPAFP and VAPP typically far worse than those brought about by wild-type polio, but they can also accompany other negative side effects including neurological damage.

Far from being a success, in other words, India’s polio vaccine campaign appears to have induced a new epidemic of a much worse type of polio-related paralysis that is even more deadly than the first one. And based on the figures, overall rates of NPAFP in particular are now 12 times higher in India following the polio vaccine campaigns, with some areas of the country reporting rates as elevated as 35 times higher.

India spent billions on the polio eradication scam when it could have used that money to improve water and sanitation Which is known to prevent polio outbreaks.

According to the IJME report, the entire polio vaccine scam in India was spawned from initial grants made by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and various other groups that claimed the program would eventually pay off. But the overall costs once India started paying for the program quickly ballooned to more than 100 times the initial investment amount, with more than $2.5 billion and counting still being funneled into it.

“The Indian government finally had to fund this hugely expensive program, which cost the country 100 times more than the value of the initial grant,” write the authors. “From India’s perspective the exercise has been extremely costly both in terms of human suffering and in monetary terms. It is tempting to speculate what could have been achieved if the $2.5 billion spent on attempting to eradicate polio were spent on water and sanitation and routine immunization.”

In their conclusion, the authors basically decry what Bill Gates and the others have done by injecting monetary grants for the program, noting that it epitomizes “nearly everything that is wrong with donor funded ‘disease specific’ vertical projects at the cost of investments in community-oriented primary health care (horizontal programs).”

Sources for this article include:

April 14, 2012

Child Paralyzed By Vaccinations And Stolen From Mother By State

Because I am doing a horrible job with my blog, I recently allowed 2 very similar situations (cases) slip by me without posting them. This is the third case. I will NOT let this one go unpublished.

The system is so desperate that the entire vaccine house of cards is about to crumble that they are demanding their partners in crime, big government, step in and kidnap children who could go to A FAIR COURT and PROVE that vaccines are killing people.

America and the UK are both a cesspool of corporate and big government corruption that is getting so out of control that they to, will fall just like the dinosaurs before them, one day soon.

Child Paralyzed By Vaccinations And Stolen From Mother By State

By Christina England | April 13th, 2012 |

**Names have been changed to protect the identity of this family. All quotes are mother’s exact words and it must be noted that her first language is not English.

Emma is a six year old little girl who is suffering from severe vaccine damage which has been verified by several leading experts. Emma is totally paralyzed and unable to move any part of her body. She cannot speak and breaths with the aid of a small tube inserted through a tiny incision in her windpipe called a tracheotomy.

Instead of the help and compensation her family should be receiving, Emma has been stolen by the state and spends her days in what her mother describes as a ‘dreadful institution for the disabled’. Instead of the support Emma’s mother needs to come to terms with what has happened to her daughter she has been accused of trying too hard to find answers and get the professional help that she believes her daughter needs,

Ms X, Emma’s mother, is devastated and says that she did nothing wrong. She told me:

“I have a clean criminal record, I have no history of substance abuse of any kind, no rehab no nothing!! All I am guilty of is sometimes acting on fear my daughters time was running out.

I want her out of there NOW!!!

When I went to visit her, her skin stank, her stoma around her tracheotomy was bloody and dirty, she was in a tiny warm room with no fan or air conditioning, she is not allowed in a bath, she is not allowed to go out for walk, the staff don’t know a cough assist, which is terrible, as a cough assist is VITAL to her care, not knowing how to work this is unacceptable because if something happens and they don’t know, Emma could die!!!!! She has a cut on her neck after the nurses put a string on her skin with no sponge underneath resulting in this terrible cut!!!!!

It is really draconian how they have kidnapped her from me and now forbid me to see her.”

Sadly, Emma is just one out of a total of 10,000 children who have been taken into care in Great Britain since April 2011. Many of these children the Daily Mail (1) reported today, are part of the ever growing statistics in a worrying trend that is raising fears among professionals that large numbers of vulnerable children are being taken away from their families unnecessarily and left to languish in a care system that is failing them.

So how did a severely vaccine damaged child become part of these appalling statistics?

Life was not always this bad for Emma and she did not start out her life disabled; in fact she used to be a normal, cheeky little girl who enjoyed toddling around and playing with her toys. Sadly however, despite being born a normal baby Emma was constantly ill, suffering from a weakened immune system resulting in persistent infections requiring antibiotics for weeks on end.

Ms X believes that Emma’s problems first began after she received her eight week routine vaccinations. Within hours of the vaccinations she became weak and feverish, refusing feeds. Worried, Ms X took Emma to the local hospital where doctors assured her that Emma had picked up a virus and would be fine. Not connecting the illness to the vaccinations, and blissfully unaware that this was only the beginning of her daughters problems, Ms X took her baby home.

As the months went by Ms X noticed that after each vaccination Emma became sick, however, convinced that by giving Emma her routine vaccinations she was doing the best that she could do for her child and on the advice given to her by her doctor, she continued to allow Emma to have the vaccinations. She said:

“It never occurred to me that her problems could be linked to the vaccinations. I had no one around to tell me about the possible side-effects of vaccines.”

Emma’s real problems only became apparent after she received the MMR vaccination at 13 months. Up until this age Emma had been developing normally, she was beginning to walk, talk, was alert and was reaching all her developmental milestones. After the MMR however, Emma became very sick indeed after an extremely bad reaction. By this time Ms X was beginning to connect the dots and was waking up to the realization that it was the vaccinations that were causing her daughters problems. Sadly it was too late for little Emma. The damage was done.

At 15 months Emma began to lose her balance and kept falling on her face. However, instead of putting her hands out to protect herself Emma just allowed herself to fall. Worried, Ms X took her daughter to see to a neurologist. He did standard tests which ALL came back normal.

Emma slowly began to lose control of her arms and upper torso and by June 2008 at the tender age of two she was unable to breathe on her own and was taken to the PICU (Pediatric Intensive Care Unit).

Ms X said:

“Shortly after that, the neurologist told me that he thought that Emma had a disease, but he had no proof for the diagnosis, so nothing further was done. I was devastated, fearing that my baby was going to die. I fell into the darkness of hopelessness and sorrow, so that I spent weeks as if in a daze. I don’t know what happened, but after two months something in my heart told me that Emma was not to die, not like this and not without knowing what was making her so sick. I felt I must carry on and that I was to get a second opinion. We took her to the best specialists in the UK. They did many tests, but still no answers!!”

Beginning to realize that the vaccinations were the problem, Ms X’s instincts told her to not allow Emma to have any further vaccinations. However, as we all know, doctors can be extremely persuasive and when you are alone and frightened and needing to trust doctors with your child’s life, it is easy to believe what they are telling you. Sadly against Ms X’s better judgment Emma was given the flu vaccine and she immediately became much worse.

Ms X relayed what happened next:

“Next day her eyes started to move rapidly from side to side like nystagmus and her body lost blood without any reason and she needed a blood transfusion of 500ml. She got very sick and my poor baby almost died, BUT then it was like an invisible voice and guidance that led me to the possibility that this illness of hers was very likely from the jabs, so I started to think back and everything became clear to me, namely that her symptoms were the serious side-effects of vaccinations!”


Fearing the worst for Emma Ms X did everything possible to help her daughter. She traveled from one doctor to another to get help, advice and treatment. Each time the doctors explained to Ms X that Emma’s condition had been caused through VID or Vaccine Induced Disease.

Ms X managed to get reports from four leading experts from around the world stating that Emma had been damaged by vaccinations.

Here are the relevant extracts from those reports:

Expert 1.


My diagnosis of Emma ———— d.o.b. ——-.2006 condition is on clinical grounds but supported by some investigation as being that of motor sensory polyneuropathy and involving the brain stem nerves as well as the pheripheral ones. This has been accepted by others before my involvement in this case and Emma —— was subsequently given treatment with immunoglobulins and steroids. To me most likely autoimmune response following vaccination. Suggestive diagnosis of some form of spinal muscular atrophy was never confirmed and later rejected.

Expert 2


Currently the patient is totally paralyzed with control only over her eyes and eyelids. Today she is on 24hr assistance with BiPAP breathing.

The patient was seen by various experts and her clinical condition does not fit any known classical neurological syndrome. However, careful anamnesis and the development of her symptoms following vaccination suggest a high probability that her current condition may be the consequence of vaccination induced damage syndrome (VIDS).

In view of a lack of any better suggestion for diagnosis it appears to me that the option of VIDS is very likely the cause of her unusual condition.

Expert 3


I enclose a copy of my report on Emma ——-. She is severely affected by what is most likely the result of motorsensory neuropathy following immunization. There is much weakness of the limbs and the body, but her brain stem nerves are also affected, and she requires direct gastric feeding and breathing assistance which is not sufficient for her now, and she requires tracheotomy as there is much swelling in her laryngeal region.

Expert 4 (has not met Emma but agreed with the findings in the reports)


Emma ——- I have been gratified to find that hospital and consulting physicians unanimously agreed that Emma —————-’ autoimmune illness was the result of routine childhood vaccines, with the MMR vaccine being the final agent of incapacitation.

Despite all this evidence and with Emma so desperately ill and disabled the authorities decided that Emma was not vaccine damaged at all. In their report they say that she is suffering from ‘spinal muscular atrophy’ a condition that had already been disregarded as pointed out in the first experts report.

In a bid to quieten one of the above experts who had became very vocal with his views and opinions on Emma’s condition, the authorities threatened him with the removal of his license if he did not keep quiet. Sadly this elderly and brave doctor died from a heart attack a short time later. Was his heart attack caused as a direct result of his treatment? Sadly that is a question that cannot be answered.

The latest reports on Emma state that she is suffering from a genetic fault that inhibits her ability to process vitamin B2 and other vitamins from her diet so she has been put on a vitamin B2 treatment.

This raises the question should Emma have been vaccinated in the first place?

The authorities agree that Emma has been well cared for and that Ms X has a great understanding of her daughter’s problems however, they feel that she would not be able to care for the child on a full time basis. They say that Ms X is a wonderful and dedicated mother but the stress of looking after a child like Emma will become too much for her and have suggested that she has mental health problems.

This is something that appears to be regularly suggested as a matter of course in the majority of cases where a vaccine injury has occurred. I have yet to come into contact with any family where this has not been used. As a consequence Ms X like many other parents has had to endure hours of psychiatric tests and assessments.

Social services have said that Ms X neglected Emma, endangering her life by traveling to different experts around the world for assessments, answers and treatments not available in the UK. However, Ms X says that the treatment that she was able to get for Emma abroad actually saved her life and all she is guilty of is trying too hard to find a cure for her dying child.

As a direct result of the accusations Ms X has been banned from photographing her child and is only allowed to visit her every 7-10 days with strict supervision.

Charles Pragnell is an independent social care management consultant, a Child/Family Advocate, and an Expert Defense Witness – Child Protection, and has given evidence to courts in cases in England, Scotland, and New Zealand.

Mr. Pragnell has over forty years of experience in working directly with children and young people as a social worker, a senior manager of social services, and Director of an independent organization providing services for children and families.

In his article ‘Mandatory Persecution of Children and Families’ (2) He explains:

What research is showing is that many hundreds of thousands of children and their families are being drawn into the Child Protection system for little or no reason, subjecting them to the fear-invoking processes of a child protection investigation and the accompanying stigma in their neighbourhood leading to their isolation. Many families report that such needless investigations have devastated and destroyed their lives and other research has shown that children suffer serious and long-lasting emotional harm from such investigations.

In another article (3) he explains how many children are suffering from severe reactions to vaccinations. He believes that many parents are being falsely accused of child abuse after a vaccine injury has occurred. He says that they are very often reported to the child protection agencies for neglect or for appearing to be over anxious parents. He says:

They are seen as over-anxious and if they seek a second medical opinion, they are accused of `Doctor-shopping’. In the UK they are then called to a Child Protection Conference with all the assembled professionals usually after being subjected to an extremely invasive child protection investigation. They are not allowed representation although they are being accused of a criminal offence of neglecting their child and they are summarily found guilty merely on the opinions and suppositions of the professionals present, many of whom they have never met before.

This is exactly what Ms X has been accused of. Mr. Pragnell’s views are in line with those expressed by Lisa Blakemore-Brown psychologist, author and an expert specializing in autism. In an article ‘The Independent Newspaper Measles Vaccine Scam’ (4) she says:

Professor Elizabeth Miller, Head of the Immunization Department in the UK who worked closely with Bob Chen at the CDC when the first Thimerosal studies were being “managed”, sat in the Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunisation/Adverse Reactions Sub Committee, with Dr David Salisbury and none other than Professor Roy Meadow, of MBSP fame, when the MMR was being introduced.

In the Sally Clark case, Professor Meadow accused her of killing two children who had just been vaccinated, one just 5 hours earlier. To my certain knowledge, as a Psychologist specialising in Autism since 1993, and working as a generic Psychologist since 1984, many parents whose children reacted to a vaccine have been wrongly accused of Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy (MSBP). Known side effects have been morphed into child abuse. Workers have been taught to view them this way and act accordingly. Some have had their children taken from them, some were sent to prison and Sally Clark lost her children and her life.

Lisa Blakemore-Brown and Charles Pragnell are spot on; it appears that once a vaccine injury has occurred the government and medical profession do their utmost to cover this up to protect the vaccination schedules. What could be easier than blaming parents for the injury? The parents of vaccine injured children are being automatically blamed for neglect or child abuse taking the focus off of the vaccinations and transferring it directly onto the parents.

This is what the UK laughingly calls ‘Child Protection’; I call it protecting the vaccine schedules and their bank balance.


Laura Clark Daily Mail ‘10,000 children taken into care: Numbers have doubled in the past four years’ Read more:
Charles Pragnell – Mandatory Persecution of Children and Families
Charles Pragnell – Vaccines and Child Abuse Accusations
Lisa Blakemore-Brown – The Independent Newspaper Measles Vaccine

April 12, 2012

Big Pharma Finds A New Way To Reduce PROSECUTABLE Vaccine Injury Cases.

Editor’s Note:
Let’s face it. The ONLY vaccine injury cases the pharmacological industrial complex can NOT weasel their way out of are the cases where the VICTIM is having convulsions directly after taking the shot. This same medical establishment could care less about vaccine injury cases that occur weeks or even days after a vaccine is given. By that time, the vaccine pushers can claim everything BUT, the vaccine is at fault.

Even with the vaccine pushers legally protected from MOST prosecution once the vaccine VICTIM leaves the doctors office, the number of vaccine injuries right after a vaccine is given, is still quite high. The Gardasil vaccine alone has pushed those numbers (people) into the stratosphere.

I have been waiting for the medical establishment to pull this very crap right out of their legal department’s ass. It doesn’t take a doctor with a Phd to see the REAL reason for drugging babies, children and teenagers BEFORE they get their poison. If you drug the infant, child, teen BEFORE the injection they stand a far less chance of showing VISIBLE signs of having a seizure. Even though, the CAUSE of having the seizure will still be going on inside their body, the injury will be simply MASKED by the drugs until they ware off. That gives the vaccine pushers time to get your infant, child, teen out the door and, any damage that shows up later is YOUR PROBLEM.

If you refuse the ‘drug treatment’ before the injection, that’s OK too. If your infant, child teen have the standard seizures, paralysis… that comes with these poisons the medical establishment, in their typical slime ball way, will simply blame the seizures ON YOU for NOT getting your infant, child, teen drugged BEFORE the injection.

Watch vaccine injuries cases dramatically decrease and watch the slime balls promote this as the vaccines themselves being the reasons why.


Drug babies before vaccinating them, doctors demand

Wednesday, April 11, 2012 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer

(NaturalNews) A recent study published in the journal Pediatrics suggests that giving eight-week-old babies several doses of acetaminophen (Tylenol) before and after the barrage of recommended childhood vaccines they typically receive will help them to sleep better, and improve vaccine efficacy. And because many doctors believe that sleeping after vaccinations is a positive sign that vaccines are supposedly “working,” this dangerous protocol could become common practice among pediatric doctors when administering childhood vaccines.

Linda Franck and her colleagues at the University of California, San Francisco’s (UCSF) Department of Family Health Care Nursing conducted a randomized, controlled trial on 70 infants that technically constitutes child abuse. For their study, the team told one group of mothers to administer standard care to their babies, while the other was told to give their babies a heavy load of pre-dosed acetaminophen 30 minutes before receiving their vaccines, and every four hours after that for a total of five doses.

At the conclusion of the study, the team observed that acetaminophen helped the babies to sleep more, and also allegedly helped to increase their antibody production rates. Franck and her colleagues also made the suggestion based on their findings that young babies receive their vaccinations in the afternoon rather than in the morning, so that sleep would come more naturally in the 24 hours that followed.

It is bad enough that babies are injected with upwards of 20 vaccines within the first few months of their lives ( But now researchers want to give these delicate, developing human beings large doses of acetaminophen, which has been shown in numerous studies to cause liver and kidney damage, and even death (

Acetaminophen has never been proven safe for children

In fact, according to a recent review by, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) scientific panel back in 2007 recommended that acetaminophen no longer be recommended for children under six years of age because of its extreme toxicity. The FDA ignored this recommendation, however, and continues to recommend acetaminophen for young children, even though it has never been proven safe for this age group (

Back in 2009, a study out of the Czech Republic found the opposite of what the UCSF researchers found, observing that the administration of acetaminophen before and after vaccinations actually obstructs the supposed effectiveness of the vaccines. Conducted by Dr. Roman Prymula from the University of Defence, that study revealed that acetaminophen reduces the immune response to vaccines, which mainstream medicine considers an indicator that the vaccines are functioning as intended (

And a 2008 study published in the journal Lancet also found that babies who are given acetaminophen within the first year of their lives are 46 percent more likely than other babies to develop asthma. According to Richard Beasley from the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand who conducted the study, acetaminophen reduces antioxidant levels in babies’ bodies, which makes them more prone to oxidative stress and lung damage.

Sources for this article include:

April 8, 2012

Autism Redefinition Scam And The Denial Shell Game

As Autism (or chemical & heavy metal poisoning) exploded when vaccine schedules increased in the nineties the medical industrial complex went into panic mode and expanded the definition of Autism into a ‘spectrum of disorders’. Other names like Asperger’s was thrown into the definition to muddy the water leading the Autism epidemic trail BACK TO VACCINES.

Then the medical industrial complex cooked up the the genetics ‘theory’ that stated the Autism epidemic explosion was due to genetics. The pushers of this ‘theory’ even infiltrated autism organizations, filling the heads of people stupid enough to believe the idea that autism was “evolution” and that we should NOT stop or interfere with it. At least there is still enough people in the science community that couldn’t be bought off to push the genetic autism theory but, instead, shot it down in flames as being the scientifically absurd fraud it was.

Autism: The Epidemic The Medical Establishment ‘DARE NOT CALL AN EPIDEMIC’

It seems that the original wiseacring by the medical establishment to reclassify autism has come back to bite them in the ass. Now, it’s been reported by the same medical establishment that, being autistic has soured 56% in just five years!!! That is an epidemic beyond anything scene in America at the height of the American polio epidemic. However, the medical industrial complex REFUSES TO CALL THE AUTISM EPIDEMIC AN EPIDEMIC!!! Why is that? Simple, because by classifying autism as being an epidemic the medical establishment WILL BE FORCED TO ADMIT IT’S NOT JUST SOME ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL PHENOMENON’. THEY WILL ALSO BE FORCED TO ADMIT THAT AUTISM IS A ‘PHYSICAL’ NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER. BY THESE ADMISSIONS THEY WILL ALSO BE FORCED TO FIND THE CAUSE OF THE AUTISM EPIDEMIC. This is what the medical establishment can NOT afford because the house of cards that POISONOUS vaccines are built on will crumble AND THEY KNOW THAT.

The pharmacological industrial complex has to drive the number of autism cases down to NON epidemic proportions if this absurd game of vaccination and autism is to continue. I think Pandora and the genie have already left their box’s and bottles.

How about this idea.
That we the people, make doctors who are hell bent on giving out vaccines like halloween candy, personally responsible when that vaccine causes the laundry list of health issues covered ad nauseum at this blog. If they do NOT wish to be held responsible WE NEED TO FIND OUT WHY.


April 1, 2012

FDA Admits In Court Case That Vaccines Still Contain Mercury.

Yeah, your HDTV, print magazines, pediatrician and those so-called ‘skeptics’ ALL LIED TO YOU!
FDA admits in court case that vaccines still contain mercury

(NaturalNews) It is a common myth today that the vaccines administered to children no longer contain the toxic additive thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative linked to causing permanent neurological damage. But a recent federal case involving the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has revealed that, contrary to this widely-held belief, thimerosal is actually still present in many batch vaccines, including in the annual influenza vaccine that is now administered to children as young as six months old.

Filed by a citizen-backed coalition advocating vaccine safety, the lawsuit against the FDA alleged that the agency’s continued endorsement and approval of thimerosal as a vaccine additive is a serious public health threat, especially since safer alternatives already exist and are widely used voluntarily by many vaccine manufacturers. But Judge Brett Kavanaugh, siding with antiquated pseudoscience, decided that thimerosal is not a health threat, and that those who wish to avoid it can simply choose thimerosal-free alternatives.

Ignoring the evidence of thimerosal’s dangers brought before him on behalf of the millions of children across the country who continue to be injected with this mercury-based additive, Judge Kavanaugh declared that the plaintiffs, which include groups like the Coalition for Mercury-Free Drugs (CMFD), did not have proper standing to file the lawsuit. And in the process, both he and the FDA inadvertently admitted that thimerosal is still present in many childhood vaccines, which counters popular claims to the contrary.

FDA admits on its website that thimerosal is still in vaccines

The fact that Judge Kavanaugh refused to hear the case is tragic in and of itself, as thimerosal, which is composed of 50 percent mercury, has been proven to cause serious health damage. But what may be even worse is the fact that many people falsely believe that thimerosal is not even included in vaccines anymore, which is leading them to blindly allow them to be administered to their children. And the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the FDA have continued to provide dubious and misleading information on the subject, which the mainstream media has been complicit in spreading over the years.

But the FDA explains, in no uncertain terms, directly on its website that thimerosal is still added to certain vaccines. For this reason alone, it is crucial that parents who choose to vaccinate their children ask for an ingredients list for each and every vaccine before allowing them to be administered to their children.

“While the use of mercury-containing preservatives has declined in recent years with the development of new products formulated with alternative or no preservatives, thimerosal has been used in some immune globulin preparations, anti-venins, skin test antigens, and ophthalmic and nasal products, in addition to certain vaccines,” writes the FDA on its Thimerosal in Vaccines page (

Don’t believe the lie: Thimerosal is eventually converted by the body into highly-toxic inorganic mercury

Another myth often spread by thimerosal advocates claims that the ethylmercury compounds that compose roughly 50 percent of the preservative are not actually harmful because they are different from the type found in a can of tuna. But a comprehensive review conducted by Dr. Paul G. King has proven otherwise, showing that ethylmercury is first metabolized by the body into toxic methylmercury, which is then metabolized into inorganic mercury (

Both methylmercury and inorganic mercury are listed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as toxic substances responsible for causing neurological problems, brain disorders, nervous system illnesses, gastrointestinal problems, kidney failure, respiratory illness, and death (

Sources for this article include:

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at