If you think the headline is ‘RADICAL’, ‘FARFETCHED’, ‘SENSATIONAL’ or even worse, ‘A FLAT OUT LIE’, you better prepare yourself for this…
The American Medical Association is floating out, through their ‘journal’, that it would be a great (But certainly NOT original) idea to force the public to take experimental vaccines. Now, the reason why this over-the-top article was MOST LIKELY put out by the puppet association of ALL the major pharmaceutical companies, was to be used AS A TALKING POINT by another PUPPET of the pharmaceutical industrial complex, the corporate media.
See Related: NO VACCINES!!! NO HEALTH CARE!!! It seems I’ve been vindicated again.
The JAMA article was most likely constructed so that the corporate media can CREATE A FAKE AND COMPLETELY CONTROLLED DEBATE. Where one tele-prompter talking head on one side of the issue is pushing the FORCED experimental vaccines on the public (bad cop), while another ‘COOLER HEAD, CALMER, MORE RATIONAL’ tele-prompter talking head is completely in disagreement with the other talking head on the experimental vaccine issue BUT, IS IN FULL AGREEMENT THAT THE PUBLIC SHOULD HAVE ‘APPROVED’ VACCINES FORCED ON THEM (good cop).
Don’t fall for this FAKE DON KING STYLE BOXING MATCH. The corporate media loves to play these little mind games on the public. Even if you think the public SHOULD BE FORCED VACCINATED. WHAT WOULD STOP THE SAME BIG GOVERNMENT WORKING ON BEHALF OF BIG PHARMA, FORCING EXPERIMENTAL VACCINES ON THE POPULATION LIKE THE AMA SUGGESTS, ONCE THEY START FORCING THEIR WAY INTO YOUR VEINS WITH SO-CALLED ‘APPROVED’ VACCINES!?!
Both ideas of force medicating the public, experimental vaccines or ‘approved’, are right out of the Nazi hand book from Nuremberg Nazi Germany. If you think it’s NOT, just read below.
This excerpt is from Brown University. Similar excerpts can be found in any and ALL OF ACADEMIA.
The idea of, “state before individual” was typical of the Nazi era and physicians began to lose sight of their moral obligations as they were swept into the dehumanizing Nazi political culture. The slew of exotic diseases and afflictions, a condition of the war environment, were seen as a, “national threat,” and it was to these “threats” that German doctors began to assume the responsibility of acting on behalf of the state in order to imporve the health of the nation. On the basis of national thought and utilitarianism doctors no longer acted as caretakers but as puppets of a government obsessed with racial and genetic purity. Medical experiments committed under the disguise of scientific research fell into three basic categories: (1) Medico-Military Research; (2) Miscellaneous, Ad Hoc Experiments; and (3) Racially Motivated Experiments. (1)
Most drugs INCLUDING VACCINES have so many side effects / adverse effects they should NEVER have been approved in the first place. Everybody, who has NOT been living under a rock, knows that the FDA who approve these drugs also work for the same pharmaceutical companies once the drugs have been voted to ‘approve’ status. This so-called drug and vaccine ‘approval system’, is a system where the ONLY thing that separates the FDA drug approvers from the drug companies themselves is an absurd ‘turnstile’, where the approvers are shuttling back and forth, to and from the drug companies. Essentially, the FDA has been ‘privatized’ and, IN REALITY, is a PRIVATE organization with the words ‘FEDERAL’ & ‘DEPARTMENT’ in it so it can still get tax payer money to pay to keep the lights on in the building.
THE VERY DRUG AND VACCINE APPROVAL SYSTEM IS CORRUPT BEYOND BELIEF AND, SOME TALKING HEAD IN A CALMING VOICE IS GOING TO TALK YOU INTO THINKING ‘APPROVED’ DRUGS AND VACCINES IS THE MORE RATIONAL CHOICE TO BE FORCED INTO THE VEINS OF THE PUBLIC!?!?! How dumb down do both the corporate media and pharmaceutical companies think public is anyway?
So basically, EVEN APPROVED DRUGS CAN BE CLASSIFIED AS EXPERIMENTAL, because NO ‘experiments’ have EVER been conducted LONG TERM on all the side and ill effects of the drugs AND VACCINES.
The ONLY reason the AMA HAS TO SHOW YOU THEIR TRUE NATIONAL SOCIALIST COLORS is because MOST PEOPLE, not living under a rock, have seen or been a victim to both drugs and vaccines and, the gig is up for big pharma. Now, they think they can PR and hoodwink the SAME PUBLIC WHO WON’T TAKE THEIR DANGEROUS VACCINES to go along with forced vaccinations AS THE ONLY LAST COURSE OF ACTION TO GET THEM INTO TH VEINS OF A PUBLIC THAT NO LONGER WANTS THEM.
This is ALSO the story of the 19th century Euro smallpox vaccine FAILURE ‘reinventing’ itself in the 21st century. Where, the FORCED smallpox vaccine created mass epidemics at the height of the mass vaccine programs. Where, people in Europe refused to take them and governments started to jail people that wouldn’t take them. That idea failed with a capital F and, once the vaccinations ended (by default), SO TO DID THE SMALLPOX EPIDEMICS. Gee, go figure.
Another quick history lesson on the AMA and it’s ties to old nazi germany.
Read about Rockefeller as the AMA’s founder.
Then, Read Rockefeller Nazi ties.
So, when it comes to the AMA acting like a bunch of National Socialists (NAZIS), the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
AMA Journal: Make Participation In Vaccine Trials Mandatory
http://www.infowars.com/ama-make-participation-in-vaccine-trials-mandatory/(For ALL Sourced Links)
Population should be forced to take experimental shots “for the greater good”
Paul Joseph Watson
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
An article published by the American Medical Association’s Virtual Mentor journal advocates making participation in vaccine trials mandatory, arguing that people should be forced to take experimental shots in a similar vein to how jury service is compulsory.
The article, written by Oxford University’s Susanne Sheehy and Joel Meyer, is entitled Should Participation in Vaccine Clinical Trials be Mandated?
Concerned about the “distressing decline in the numbers of healthy volunteers who participate in clinical trials,” the piece argues that “Compulsory involvement in vaccine studies” should be considered for the “greater good of society.”
“Many societies already mandate that citizens undertake activities for the good of society; in several European countries registration for organ-donation has switched from “opt-in” (the current U.S. system) to “opt-out” systems (in which those who do not specifically register as nondonors are presumed to consent to donation) , and most societies expect citizens to undertake jury service when called upon. In these examples, the risks or inconvenience to an individual are usually limited and minor. Mandatory involvement in vaccine trials is therefore perhaps more akin to military conscription, a policy operating today in 66 countries. In both conscription and obligatory trial participation, individuals have little or no choice regarding involvement and face inherent risks over which they have no control, all for the greater good of society.”
Using the example of military conscription – the draft – to justify the idea of compulsory participation in vaccine trials, illustrates how the whole idea is completely rooted in authoritarian tendencies. The draft has its historical origins in slavery and has largely been abolished by developed nations.
And if you thought the use of the term “for the greater good of society” wasn’t downright creepy enough, the authors later propose tackling society’s reluctance to accept compulsory recruitment to vaccine trials by virtually advocating the arrival of a more deadly disease than swine flu in order to ensure “compulsory recruitment becomes a more palatable option.”
“Consider an infectious disease with a high transmission and mortality rate for which vaccine development were possible but limited by a shortage of volunteers willing to participate in clinical trials. Would mandatory participation in clinical trials then be an acceptable policy?” ask the authors, ruminating on how an “Increase (in) the severity of the disease in question,” would increase the likelihood of society accepting mandatory vaccine trials.
The authors conclude by bemoaning ethical considerations that would present a roadblock to the effort to force people to take experimental vaccines, proposing instead that a system of “mandated choice” be introduced to coerce people into agreeing to be given the shots.
Mandating that people take experimental vaccines is of course completely abhorrent, it violates the fundamental human right not to be forcibly medicated, and harks back to the dark days of eugenics, mandatory sterilizations, and episodes like the Tuskegee syphilis experiment.
The very reason why less people are willing to volunteer for vaccine trials is the fact that vaccines, whether approved or experimental, have been responsible for deaths and injuries worldwide in increasing numbers. The United States, which administers the highest number of vaccines to babies, has the highest infant mortality rate out of all developed nations, a connection that is no coincidence according to a recent medical study published in a prestigious medical journal.
Indeed, earlier this month GlaxoSmithKline was fined $93,000 dollars for its role in an experimental vaccine program in Argentina that killed 14 babies between 2007 and 2008.
For this authoritarian premise to even be considered in the AMA’s ‘Journal of Ethics’ is shocking, but the increasing move towards making vaccines mandatory is a wider phenomenon.
Last year, California passed a law that allows children to be given the Gardasil shot, which has been linked with thousands of adverse reactions and dozens of deaths, without parental consent.
Parents who try to remove their children from the ever-expanding list of “required” vaccine programs for school-age kids are being targeted by law enforcement. When Rachel Garmon told her doctor that she had taken the decision not to vaccinate her healthy 2 and a half year old son, she was subsequently visited by a Pennsylvania State Trooper who was tasked with investigating her “suspicious behavior,” despite the fact that Pennsylvania is one of the many states that allows vaccination exemptions on both religious and medical grounds.
The AMA article represents a shocking insight into the control freak tendencies of some of today’s most influential medical minds. Forcing people to take part in experimental vaccine trials that pose a serious risk to their health is totally contemptible and has no place in a free society.