From Hell To Veins

January 12, 2012

Dr. Wakefield Files Defamation Lawsuit

The house of cards is beginning to crumble on big pharma, their partner in crime, big media and, the so-called ‘skeptics’ that do their bidding on the entire Wakefield issue. The latest ‘exoneration’ SHOULD only build steam for the Wakefiled lawsuit. That is, if the Wakefield suit gets it’s day in court.
Editorial by Jenny McCarthy: MMR Doctor Exonerated—Who’s Guilty Now?
By Jenny McCarthy
March 16, 2012

The parent autism community is buzzing with excitement over a ruling by a British judge clearing Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s colleague and co-author of all charges against him that arose from a study of the relationship between gut disease, autism, and the MMR vaccine.

Judge John Mitting’s conclusion, from an appeal by the highly respected pediatric gastroenterologist Prof. John Walker-Smith, stated:

“…both on general issues and the Lancet paper and in relation to individual children, the panel’s overall conclusion that Professor Walker-Smith was guilty of serious professional misconduct was flawed…The panel’s determination cannot stand. I therefore quash it.”

Professor Walker-Smith was Andrew Wakefield’s co-author on a highly controversial study published in the medical journal The Lancet in 1998. Most of the controversy stemmed from the reporting by the co-authors that many of the parents in the study claimed that their children regressed into autism after receiving the MMR vaccine.

For parents of children with autism, this whole mess has always been a bit of a head-scratcher. The Lancet study’s conclusion that children with autism suffer from bowel disease is something any autism parent could easily confirm, and MMR, by far, has been the vaccine most commonly cited by parents as a trigger for a regression into autism. In my travels, I have heard the same story from parents about MMR leading to regression thousands of times.

In Britain, The General Medical Council is in charge of licensing and regulating doctors. Their 2010 “trial” of Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues was the longest in GMC history, lasting 217 days, and concluded by revoking the medical licenses of Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Prof Walker-Smith. At the time, Dr. Wakefield spoke of the injustice that Judge Mitting has now confirmed:

“It seemed to me that they had come to this decision a long time ago, long before the evidence was fairly heard. This is the way the system deals with dissent. You isolate, discredit and provide an example to other doctors and scientists not to get involved in this kind of thing. That is examining questions of vaccine safety.”

Now what? If the foundation of the proof that the MMR does not trigger autism is crumbling, what in the world are parents supposed to believe? If Professor Walker-Smith is not guilty on all charges, will Dr. Wakefield be next? The Canary Party’s press release explains:

“While John Walker-Smith received funding to appeal the GMC decision from his insurance carrier, his co-author Andrew Wakefield did not — and was therefore unable to mount an appeal in the high court. This year, however, Dr. Wakefield, who now conducts his research in the US, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Brian Deer, Fiona Godlee and the British Medical Journal for falsely accusing him of ‘fraud.’ The suit is currently underway in Texas, where Wakefield now lives.”

I think I’m really happy today–it’s great to see justice finally served. At the same time, have parents been given false information? Are decisions being made by parents based on headlines that may prove inaccurate? Is it possible vaccines are in fact dangerous for our most fragile kids?

If Dr. Wakefield and Prof. Walker-Smith have been found not guilty, who are the guilty parties? Mark Blaxill, chairman of the Canary Party, offers up his thoughts:

“Though justice has finally prevailed for Prof. Walker-Smith, the damage done to him and his colleagues has been incalculable. The UK government must investigate the corruption in the GMC, which has severely damaged the reputations of good, honest doctors. Most of all, it’s outrageous that Dr. Andrew Wakefield has been vilified by government officials, vaccine manufacturers and physician organizations, and that the media has accepted these unfounded accusations uncritically.”

I don’t know the answers to all these questions. Unfortunately, the GMC’s decision to turn Dr. Wakefield and Prof. Walker-Smith’s paper into a three-ring circus has put a chill on research into all the possible environmental causes of autism. Will this finally open the floodgates?

We need answers, and we need them now. Millions of children remain at risk. For one day, at least, it feels like some justice has been served.


Dr. Wakefield will have his day in court, HOPEFULLY.

We all saw how the federal ‘courts’ in the Untied States handled Jessy Ventura’s lawsuit against the TSA. Jessy Ventura was NEVER GIVEN ONE DAY IN A COURT ROOM. Which is a huge violation of OUR rights in the US under the US constitution. YES!! The US federal courts violated ALL of our rights when Ventura’s right to a FAIR day in court was denied. Question begs to be asked… Will Dr. Andrew Wakefield get his day in court? Or, will the same judicial system that kept Ventura’s case out of court keep Wakefield’s case from EVER seeing a day in court as well?

The Defendants:
The British Medical Journal (the media / medical industry)
Journalist Brian Deer (the media)
Dr. Fiona Godlee (medical industry / media)

What the Wakefield Lawsuit Means If The Suit Goes Through And Wakefield Wins:
I see this as a case MUCH BIGGER than Dr. Wakefiled himself.

If Dr. Wakefield wins it would be a huge blow to the main stream media that aided and abetted KNOWN FALSE accusations against Dr. Wakefield. The lawsuit would PROVE IN COURT that the actions of the defendants keeping FACTS from Dr. Wakefiled et al research relevant to the public’s health & safety PURPOSELY out of the public record by means of defaming Dr. Wakefield in the process would be A GROSS VIOLATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND TRUST. This, on top of ruining a professional career and a person’s individual well being in the process.

Facts From the Suit:
Click link below for copy of suit.

Brian Deer falsified data.

Defaming statements by both the BMJ and Brian Deer were based off of KNOWN falsified data. This is where Dr. Godlec aided and abetted these false alligations against Dr. Wakefild by publishing defaming articles to collaborate Deers false and CORRUPTED allegations.

Dr. Wakefield presents the ‘facts’ in the lawsuit provided in pdf form linked to in this article.

This is not a hard case for Dr. Wakefield et al to prove in the Texas court. The Texas court HAS jurisdiction over the defendants since their fraud WAS perpetuated not only in Texas BUT, all across America by the corporate media and the internet.

If Wakefield wins his lawsuit an investigation of a coverup needs to be done ASAP where another lawsuit can be field against the parties this fraud was covering up for.

I’ve been monitoring internet communication on the filing of this lawsuit by Dr. Wakefield. What I noticed was very PREDICTABLE.

Friends of the corporate established media and the pharmacological Medical Industrial Complex have come out in a firestorm trying to defend the ‘OFFICIAL LIE’ as they always do. In this case the lying of Brian Deer et al.

Who are these people? The core of the people ‘leading the charge’ are ‘self described’ skeptics. The problem is that they really are NOT ‘TRUE SKEPTICS’. A ‘true skeptic’ would be a skeptic of ALL sides of an issue. These so-called skeptic groups are lead by people who ALWAYS are one sidedly skeptical and, THAT SIDE ALWAYS TOWS THE CORPORATE / BIG GOVERNMENT LINE. Always, without fail!

That, by itself, should make ANY INDEPENDENT THINKER a skeptic of the skeptic movement itself. These so-called ‘skeptics’ either, NEVER present their ‘skepticism’ from a point of view that looks at ALL the evidence on BOTH SIDES or, they ONLY look at the ‘weakest’ argument and NOT all the others. They typically just defend the corporate / government ‘officaildom’ on one hand while going ‘ape’ being a skeptic on the opposite issue with NO BALANCE of skepticism what-so-ever.

There is plenty of valid documentation that both corporate and government entities employ a great number of ‘hacks’ out there on the internet to do their bidding for them in the court of public opinion and, it doesn’t really take a rocket scientist to figure out that the leaders of these so-called skeptic websites are nothing more than paid for hacks. Paid to tow the corporate / corporate-government line, and if you really understood ‘what it would mean if Wakefield wins his suit’ then, it’s easy to understand the all out attack on his lawsuit by these ‘hacks’ out here on the internet.



  1. My daughter was damaged by the hep-B vaccine at birth, which caused encephalitis and subsequent autism. I said no to the MMR (and had said no to the hep-B, but they didn’t ask permission before they gave it. No liability for them, though!). I totally support Dr. Wakefield. I was buoyant yesterday about the lawsuit, thinking that he would prevail, and everyone would have to admit that the MMR sometimes causes autism and/or bowel disease, but today I realized how unlikely that is to happen. Big Pharma is going to go ballistic to squelch Dr. Wakefield and destroy him once and for all, and the medical cartel and the corrupt, stupid media are going to help it. How likely is it that the jurors will not have been brainwashed by the pro-vax message which has permeated everything? How likely is it that the judge and jury will refuse to be bought by Big Pharma’s billions, which I’m sure it will be very generous with? It knows that this is a slippery slope, and that they and their lucrative vaccine cult are in danger of sliding right into the ocean.

    Comment by cynthia parker — January 13, 2012 @ 3:15 p01 | Reply

    • Cynthia,
      I am so sorry to hear you / your daughter’s very owen autonomy as a human being WAS VIOLATED, as Dr. Wakefield would say, WITH CALLUS DISREGARD and, your daughter paid the price FOR THIS CRIME committed against her will. Just because those who committed the CRIME got away with it, does NOT make it ANY LESS A CRIME! I’m so glad you are sharing you and your daughters TRUE story. Please go to every message board on the internet you possible can and scream it from the roof tops.

      The hospitals where we go to have our children, absolutely have evil people that work in them. Are ALL the people working at hospitals evil? Of course not. However, it is well documented over and, over that those people who are truly evil, will shoot up your child with the dangerous Hep B vaccine WITHOUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE. I have first hand experience of this.

      Hospitals like to ‘monitor’ the new born children. It is NOT uncommon that they will take your child at 3:30 – 4:00 AM when the mother and father are exhausted to a room where they ‘warm up’ the new born. That’s where and, when they shoot them up. I know this because, when you go into that room with your new born some of the other new born have the needle and syringe right at their feet. I stayed with my first daughter every time the hospital pulled that. I was NOT as vigilant with our second daughter and let them slip off with her ‘one time’ during those wee morning hours. SHAME ON ME!

      If you want to know if they shot up your new born with the dangerous Hep B vaccine AGAINST YOUR CONSENT when they snuck your new born out, here is what you do. These hospitals get ‘rewarded’ for making their vaccine quota’s. So, ever vaccine MUST BE ‘electronically’ accounted for. If you are NOT sure what the hospital did behind your back you can request an ‘itemized’ list of EVERYTHING you / your insurance company was billed for. If the hospital in fact, shot up your new born, that shot will be included in the itemized bill. Had the hospital shot our daughter up we could hold them liable regardless of whether they claimed they were not liable because we still had or NON consent form.

      I just quickly want to comment on the Hep B vaccine.

      Cynthia, the Hep B vaccine is VERY dangerous. I just posted that a very close friend of the family came across my blog where she told me the story of how she contracted MS. Right now she is almost crippled to being bed ridden. She’s not there yet but, isn’t far from being that debilitated. She told me that when she was a nurse, she, and about nine other staff members at the hospital were REQUIRED to take the Hep B vaccine. This, in Kansas City. A couple of really stupid doctors also volunteered their veins. She told me that EVERY SINGLE STAFF MEMBER that got the Hep B vaccine came down with MS. As their symptoms got worse and, MORE NOTICEABLE, the hospital began a ‘weeding out’ process on ALL OF THEM by giving them more and, more difficult assignments that they could in no way handle due to their condition. They were all either let go outright or they transfered to other hospitals and or medical facilities. The reason the hospital wanted them ALL weeded out was obvious. With all of the people who took the vaccine all working together at the hospital stricken with MS the evidence that a.) the vaccine was in deed dangerous and b.) the effects of the vaccine on those staff members served as irrefutable evidence that both the hospital and vaccine manufacture were liable.

      This friend of the family feels the CDC should also be sued along with the hospital and the vaccine manufacture.

      Comment by nwqfk — January 13, 2012 @ 3:15 p01 | Reply

  2. “A‘true skeptic’ would be a skeptic of ALL sides of an issue.”

    Are you a ‘true skeptic’? Where’s your skepticism of Wakefield’s side of the story?

    Before you claim that you have looked at ‘both sides’ and concluded Andy is in the right – I will point out that this is exactly what the skeptics you criticize have done. The have looked at the facts and concluded that Wakefield is in the wrong.

    Comment by argus — February 8, 2012 @ 3:15 p02 | Reply

    • I guess the first order of business, is to clarify that I NEVER ‘claimed’ to be a ‘skeptic’. I don’t need to wear the title on my sleeve because, I’m just skeptical by nature.

      If a person has a ‘track record’ for robbing banks, I’m going to be LESS skeptical of the witnesses to the robbery statements than I am going to be of the robber’s statements. Which is essentially what you have in the Wakefield vs Big Pharma issue.

      Unfortunately, what so-called FACTS the ‘self proclaimed’ skeptics (of usually ANY subject that does NOT tow the corporate line) present to the public, in the case of Dr. Wakefield, are not even ‘reality’ based. When the TRUE skeptic comes across this THEME among the Wakefield protagonists, the so-called skeptics CLAIMS crumble like a house of cards.

      Had you read ALL my postings of Dr. Wakefield you would have noted…
      There is a monumental difference between Dr. Wakefield and my stance on vaccine science. This difference in opinion alone debunks the skeptics of Dr. Wakefield. I have an ‘ANTI’ vaccine opinion, Dr. Wakefield has a ‘PRO’ vaccine opinion. The so-called ‘skeptics’ have ALWAYS painted Dr. Wakefield as anti vaccine. This is one glaring area where they are clearly trying to ‘deceive’ the public.

      How come you skeptics did NOT go after Dr. Offit when he claimed he wanted to give children 100,000 vaccines? That sounds like something Dr.Joesf Mengele would say and NOT what ‘THE SPOKESPERSON’ for the entire American pediatricians society should be saying. I was very ‘skeptical’ of that statement but, I never heard so much as ONE peep come out of the same old, same old ‘skeptics’. I guess the so-called ‘skeptics’ didn’t get ‘THEIR QUE’ from their masters in the corporate media on that one.

      In conclusion:
      It’s hard NOT to be a ‘skeptic’ of the pharmacological industrial Complex when they have something called a BAD TRACK RECORD (among many many other things) of smearing scientists / doctor that ‘get in the way’ of that complex pushing whatever the flavor of the week happens to be onto the public. In my opinion, from a historical point of view, you partnered with the ‘losing team.’

      Comment by nwqfk — February 8, 2012 @ 3:15 p02 | Reply

      • Judge Mitting in March heard the lawsuit of Dr. Wakefield’s colleagues on the Lancet study, Drs. Walker-Smith and Murch. He took an extra few weeks to study the case, feeling deeply troubled by it. Sir John Mitting concluded that there had been NO FRAUD, that the children had been appropriately treated, and that the GMC had used shallow reasoning to reach false conclusions. He restored the licenses of the doctors who had been falsely accused. If Dr. Wakefield’s insurance had been willing to pay for him to be part of this lawsuit, I do not doubt that he would have been vindicated as well.

        Comment by cia parker — August 15, 2012 @ 3:15 p08

      • I’m wide awake and see the accusers perfect lie is torn.

        OOOOOUCH! This one’s going to hurt big pharma and their paid for press-titute media (Deer?) and their paid for whores called skeptics.

        Comment by nwqfk — August 15, 2012 @ 3:15 p08

  3. The classic Trolls, alleged “skeptics” and clear employees of Pharma, are the same people who comment on every single vax article. They pretty much rely on the average person not noticing that they are on the internet constantly. Time stamps on their comments indicate this is a full time job for many of them. Often they are childless yet have an intense obsession with being pro-vax that we are supposed to believe just comes from the goodness of their hearts? They have blogs, facebook pages all dedicated to saving humanity by insisting vaccines are safe! If you follow the internet trails it always leads back to clear connections with the industry itself or government. If you call them out on their connections you are deemed a conspiracy crack head. The list is about 30 people long but pretty reliably the same folks over and over and over. Spouting the same crap. It’s like they are working from a handbook. I actually think there might be a handbook because it’s the same tactics, phrasing and tobacco science in every retort. You would have to be insane to dedicate your every waking hour to calling people stupid for simply wanting better vaccinations and safety studies.

    Science Mom
    Skeptical Scotty
    Lix Ditz

    Comment by Lyly — August 1, 2012 @ 3:15 p08 | Reply

    • You know what truly is funny Lyly? Is that I was a rabid hardcore vaccine supporter until I sat through a depopulation seminar (sponsored in part by the vaccine industry itself) and got punched right in the nose by a reality prize boxer.

      Most people are not that lucky (or unlucky depending on your point of view). Never-the-less I have devoted over twenty years of REAL research into vaccines and what really amazed me is that once I understood how to research vaccines properly did I discover how thin the veil of deception the entire science hides behind.

      Once I made that discovery. I realized just how easy it is to BS people on so many other fronts and, just how gullible I, myself really had been.

      Some people can not handle that reality so their defense mechanism of denial kicks in and these ‘trolls’ serve as their blue pill that puts them back into the matrix of deception they have grown up with their entire lives.

      It’s even worse for those who actually serve the evil. These poor fools actually believe that THEY will be spared harms way if they just ‘follow orders’. Many of them learn the hardest way of all that this simple is not true.

      Comment by nwqfk — August 14, 2012 @ 3:15 p08 | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: