From Hell To Veins

December 17, 2010

Yet Another Vindication For Andrew Wakefield: Gut Check Time For Big Pharma / Lame Stream Corporate Media.

Editor’s Note:
Most people don’t realize that Dr. Wakefield is a ‘pro-vaccine’ doctor who should get credit for acting as a professional, NO MATTER THE COST.

This so-called ‘revelation’ by lame stream media’s very own ‘Mail on-line’ (a corporate / state media giant in the UK) is really NO revelation of facts what-so-ever. If you go to Dr. Mercola’s website look up the Dr. Mercola, Dr. Wakefield video interview. (link provided below) Dr. Wakefield stated quite clearly that he had been ‘vindicated’ many times over BEFORE his own personal ‘Medical Inquisition’ (and by the lame stream corporate media) had crucified him and his research. Dr. Wakefield made it quite clear in his interview with Dr. Mercola that MANY universities / researchers verified the so-called controversial research he had done and, IN TIME, the public would become aware of what THE MEDICAL / SCIENCE COMMUNITIES ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THE LINK. The reason why universities and researchers DO NOT like to advertise that their studies confirm Dr. Wakefield’s is that they will have their funding yanked at minimum or be ‘Wakefielded’ themselves.

So basically, the ‘Mail’ should just come out and say that, what this all means is the very establishment that set out to hang Dr. Wakefield has been essentially lying to the public at the expense of Dr. Wakefield AND all those affected by vaccine damage. That’s a ‘revelation’ that really wouldn’t surprise too many people in this day and age.

Now, I haven’t read the entire Mail’s ‘version’ of this study but, my guess is the Mail’s reporter will tell the reader that…

… even though Dr. Wakefiled’s studies were correct and there maybe just slightly, if the planets are all aligned just so and, the moon is effecting the tides just right and, it falls on the correct month of the year and, Betsy the cow is back in the barn, there is a chance that a child could become autistic because of vaccines. STILL, the benefits out weigh the risks.

By The Way, Mail censors hardcore comments on their articles that DON’T tow the establishment’s line.

RELATED:
The Dr Wakefield Interviews The Main Stream Media / Big Pharma Hopes You Won’t Listen To.

—————————————————————————————-

Special Thanks To ‘Vaccine Liberation Army.com

Scientists fear MMR link to autism

By SALLY BECK, Mail on Sunday

New American research shows that there could be a link between the controversial MMR triple vaccine and autism and bowel disease in children.

The study appears to confirm the findings of British doctor Andrew Wakefield, who caused a storm in 1998 by suggesting a possible link.

Now a team from the Wake Forest University School of Medicine in North Carolina are examining 275 children with regressive autism and bowel disease – and of the 82 tested so far, 70 prove positive for the measles virus.

Last night the team’s leader, Dr Stephen Walker, said: ‘Of the handful of results we have in so far, all are vaccine strain and none are wild measles.

‘This research proves that in the gastrointestinal tract of a number of children who have been diagnosed with regressive autism, there is evidence of measles virus.

‘What it means is that the study done earlier by Dr Wakefield and published in 1998 is correct. That study didn’t draw any conclusions about specifically what it means to find measles virus in the gut, but the implication is it may be coming from the MMR vaccine. If that’s the case, and this live virus is residing in the gastrointestinal tract of some children, and then they have GI inflammation and other problems, it may be related to the MMR.’

The 1998 study by Dr Wakefield, then a reader in gastroenterology at the Royal Free Hospital in North London, and 12 other doctors claimed to have found a new bowel disease, autism enterocolitis.

Read more:

Advertisements

3 Comments »

  1. Thanks for the article. Not complaining about you but rather the site you link to; If there is one thing that infuriates me, it’s an online news article with no date. Without the date, how do we know the context of this story; was it released today in the face of the “Autism study fraud” news that’s been making the latest rounds, or was it released in 1999 a year after the initial study appeared?

    Comment by joe — January 9, 2011 @ 3:15 p01 | Reply

    • Good point.

      I’ll be more aware of that when linking.

      Comment by nwqfk — January 9, 2011 @ 3:15 p01 | Reply

  2. Howdy very cool website!! Man .. Excellent .. Superb ..
    I will bookmark your website and take the feeds additionally…I am satisfied to search out a lot of helpful information here in the
    post, we’d like work out extra techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

    Comment by Visit Website — March 9, 2013 @ 3:15 p03 | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: