From Hell To Veins

March 2, 2010

Even Pro Vaccine Admits H1N1 Vaccine Failure

Even Pro Vaccine Admits H1N1 Vaccine Failure Yet, ‘Main Stream Medical’ (MSM) Still Pushes THE Shot! Do you smell a rat?

My Commentary:
One of the worlds leading virologist / vaccine pusher and leading consultant to the CDC / WHO along with a number of countries Dr. Henry L Niman admits the very vaccine he pushed on various alternative news radio programs was a BIG FAT FAILURE! But, that’s not the WHOLE STORY…

Niman puts the blame of vaccine failure on Tamiflu and Peramivir for increases in H274Y case severity and NOT on the vaccine itself.

“Similarly, the increases in H274Y raised concerns that cases could become more severe because of initial treatment with Tamiflu or subsequent treatment with Peramivir would have limited effect. Thus, the resistance could limit treatment options, which would become a serious problem H274Y became widespread.”

-Dr Henry Niman

Which ‘MAYBE’ true but this begs asking an even more obvious question…
Dr. Niman is a virus recombining expert. Why does he continue to write off the possibility that a serious viral outbreak could occur by SIMPLY giving the population one of his damn vaccines with a LAB virus combination that later recombines with whatever virus combination is floating around in the air. To me anyway, that seems like a much greater threat to the population than a Tamiflu resistant virus.

Vaccine Failure In Severe H1N1 Cases
Dr. Henry L Niman
Recombinomics Commentary 15:44
March 2, 2010
The recent reports of vaccine failures in severe H1N1 cases in Europe and the United States have caused concern. Vaccine failure in general was expected because California/7 is a rare sub-clade with significant differences with the consensus sequence and there have been reports of low reactors which had a single amino acid difference with the consensus sequence.

However, the finding of frequent vaccine failures in severe cases has created additional concern. The vaccine was expected to provide some protection which would minimize severe cases. Although the vaccine against the 1918 virus offered better protection against 2009 pandemic challenge in mice, the current vaccine still offered some protection. However, the protection experiments used H1N1 from the earlier waves, and the emerging H1N1 may have additional changes, limiting the protection further.

In the fall wave, D225G/N was rare, but strongly associated with fatal cases. The finding that D225G created a low reactor led to concerns that an emerging H1N1 would have D255G/N because of selection pressure. The emergence of D225G was also seen in a 1919 isolate from London, which raised additional concerns regarding parallels with 1918/1919.

Similarly, the increases in H274Y raised concerns that cases could become more severe because of initial treatment with Tamiflu or subsequent treatment with Peramivir would have limited effect. Thus, the resistance could limit treatment options, which would become a serious problem H274Y became widespread. Production capacity for Relenza is significantly below Tamiflu levels, and there were shortages of the liquid pediatric Tamiflu in the fall outbreak, in spite of recommendations to limit Tamiflu treatment to patients with underlying conditions.

A winter/spring of 2010 outbreak would seriously strain antiviral stockpiles if a more severe / fatal H1N1 was in circulation, especially if it had H274Y. More severe cases would also strain health care delivery because these cases require ventilators and ECMO machines which are in limited supply, as are ICU beds.

Thus, a sharp increase in severe cases would significantly impact health care delivery and create more dire situations than were seen in the fall. These issues would be exacerbated by a public that was told that the pandemic was mild, over, or an epidemic. A realization that this information was false could create additional problems.

Sequence data on these severe cases in patients who had been vaccinated would be useful. The vaccine failure appears to be widespread, so generation of appropriate sequences, including those from lung from patients who failed anti-viral treatment, should be straightforward.

Article

Advertisements

2 Comments »

  1. Viruses evolve. Dr. Niman, who believes vaccines are safe and effective, has noticed that the H1N1 virus is mutating away from the form the vaccine was designed to target. Your interpretation is wrong on practically all fronts and you have misconstrued Dr. Niman’s position completely.

    Comment by scrutinizer — March 5, 2010 @ 3:15 p03 | Reply

    • Of course viruses evolve. That is one of the chief reasons why MOST medical research shows flu vaccines are worthless.

      Dr. Niman has made a living (along with other scientists) understanding the science of how two or more viruses can RECOMBINE to make a deadly killer virus. You can defend Dr. Niman until the cows come home, his own science clearly demonstrates that viral recombination is a wonderful bio-weapon. Which has been documented on this blog. Is that why he calls such science “ELEGANT EVOLUTION”? Hmmmm? Dr. Niman has never addressed these issues of viral recombination with the LAB VIRUSES within the vaccines themselves and avoids such topics like, well, the plague.
      https://gdsajj.wordpress.com/2009/11/30/1978-cia-document-explains-science-of-recombinant-dna-for-bio-warfare/

      Comment by nwqfk — March 5, 2010 @ 3:15 p03 | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: